I'm about 40 minutes into it and I understand it. One question I have is doesn't this data mean that John James didn't do as well as Trump? It seems like Trump easily won Michigan if they were to reverse these votes, but none of these votes were actually taken away from John James? Now I believe James would still win in a fair election but this data doesn't address the huge influx of dead votes and other avenues of cheating.
I'm about 40 minutes into it and I understand it. One question I have is doesn't this data mean that John James didn't do as well as Trump? It seems like Trump easily won Michigan if they were to reverse these votes, but none of these votes were actually taken away from John James? Now I believe James would still win in a fair election but this data doesn't address the huge influx of dead votes and other avenues of cheating.
Good question, we need to run the same analysis on James