What good is an affidavit? Like, yes, it's under oath, which means if they lie it's bad news for them. But what's to stop someone with loose morals from doing that? Is that something that really holds up in court as it boils down to a "he said, she said" kind of thing? Or is it important because of how it corroborates with the evidence presented?
If it is only one person it is a concern. But if there are more than one saying the same thing (like in this 100K middle of night dump), then it is less of a concern.
Not a concern troll. But question.
What good is an affidavit? Like, yes, it's under oath, which means if they lie it's bad news for them. But what's to stop someone with loose morals from doing that? Is that something that really holds up in court as it boils down to a "he said, she said" kind of thing? Or is it important because of how it corroborates with the evidence presented?
If it is only one person it is a concern. But if there are more than one saying the same thing (like in this 100K middle of night dump), then it is less of a concern.
It’s witness testimony
it is SWORN witness testimony
It’s evidence.
And the affiant can be called in, placed under oath, and testify about it.
If all this stuff is true, the dems are thoroughly screwed.
Sure but it's a big risk it's 5 years federal time PER OFFENSE. You get caught multiple times you are screwed.