The ONLY possible explanation for this that's not fraud would be if Trump did badly with Republicans; the higher the percentage, the more he'd be down.
But that DOESN'T explain how it starts horizontally, and how he's doing BETTER than normal before that point. Or how perfect the linear function is. Or how it's the same all over the place.
I'm not sure that's entirely true. The 0 line is comparing straight ticket R percentage to how well he did with anyone not straight ticket.
People not voting straight ticket are the ones who might just dislike Trump. So if theoretically, he pissed off a good bit of them, it would show up like that.
Nope. Left to right is how red a county is. The redder a county is, the WORSE he performed, in a perfectly linear fashion. It's inexplicable with anything but election fraud via software.
edit: but not below a threshold that seems to be around 20% red
The ONLY possible explanation for this that's not fraud would be if Trump did badly with Republicans; the higher the percentage, the more he'd be down.
But that DOESN'T explain how it starts horizontally, and how he's doing BETTER than normal before that point. Or how perfect the linear function is. Or how it's the same all over the place.
If he did bad with GOP, he would have a steady horizontal line under the 0 that is consistent across the pop%
I'm not sure that's entirely true. The 0 line is comparing straight ticket R percentage to how well he did with anyone not straight ticket.
People not voting straight ticket are the ones who might just dislike Trump. So if theoretically, he pissed off a good bit of them, it would show up like that.
But it doesn't explain the rest of it, at all.
Nope. Left to right is how red a county is. The redder a county is, the WORSE he performed, in a perfectly linear fashion. It's inexplicable with anything but election fraud via software.
edit: but not below a threshold that seems to be around 20% red