I have looked into both of these extensively and reproduced stuff with my own code.
For the Benford's Law analysis, it is definitely suspicious, however I am not 100% sure that it proves fraud. What I think it does show is maxed-out voting in wards/precincts of average size around the hump in the chart (x100, e.g. 400's, 500's sized precincts). The maxed out voting is associated with such high turnout that it is a red flag for election fraud. A real election with the dirty voter rolls present in those places, should not have such high turnout. I think they are turning out the dead people, duplicates, senile elderly, no-shows, etc.
Dr. Shiva appears to be mistaken in his analysis. I charted standalone Trump votes versus Repub party straight ticket votes, and found that they increased together. What he appears to be charting is Trump only votes MINUS straight party Republican votes against straight party Republican votes. That messes up the meaning and pretty much forces it to go downward. More comments here: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2xl96/x/c/1BivihOxu5
I have looked into both of these extensively and reproduced stuff with my own code.
For the Benford's Law analysis, it is definitely suspicious, however I am not 100% sure that it proves fraud. What I think it does show is maxed-out voting in wards/precincts of average size around the hump in the chart (x100, e.g. 400's, 500's sized precincts). The maxed out voting is associated with such high turnout that it is a red flag for election fraud. A real election with the dirty voter rolls present in those places, should not have such high turnout. I think they are turning out the dead people, duplicates, senile elderly, no-shows, etc.
Dr. Shiva appears to be mistaken in his analysis. I charted standalone Trump votes versus Repub party straight ticket votes, and found that they increased together. What he appears to be charting is Trump only votes MINUS straight party Republican votes against straight party Republican votes. That messes up the meaning and pretty much forces it to go downward. More comments here: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2xl96/x/c/1BivihOxu5
Did you get an opportunity to review this analysis? I think it is absolutely the most persuasive.
https://mobile.twitter.com/APhilosophae/status/1325592112428163072
This has been taken down.