2887
posted ago by SpaceForceMAGA +2887 / -0

.. THAT IT HAD TO MOVE MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF VOTES. THEY ARE GETTING FUCKED BY THE MASSIVE RED WAVE. IT’S OVER! CHECKMATE COMMIE SCUM

.. THAT IT HAD TO MOVE MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF VOTES. THEY ARE GETTING FUCKED BY THE MASSIVE RED WAVE. IT’S OVER! CHECKMATE COMMIE SCUM
Comments (118)
sorted by:
138
MadMaxUSMC 138 points ago +139 / -1

They drank their own Kool-Aid and believed the MSM polls.

51
Tyrant597 51 points ago +51 / -0

EXACTLY

37
TrumpsWall 37 points ago +37 / -0

“Clap you stupid bastards!”- Sleepy Joe

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
3
RedBloodofPatriotism 3 points ago +3 / -0

"I'd like to see them dance..... Where am I? That was a joke, I know where I am....?" -also also Sleepy Joe

38
Mooma 38 points ago +38 / -0

The fake polls are put out to condition the public for their desired outcome. It's all part of steal.

1
TheWinningNeverStops 1 point ago +1 / -0

One would think they learned their lesson. Guess not.

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
17
Prometheus76 17 points ago +17 / -0

They're so smart that they didn't learn from 2016. Pride cometh before the fall.

6
Mr_Clit_Beastwood 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hubris

7
KS-76- 7 points ago +7 / -0

Desperation.

3
Neonentity 3 points ago +3 / -0

Willful ignorance seldom pays off in the end.

118
ftc316 118 points ago +118 / -0

And it still wasn't even enough, then they had stop counting and dump 100,000's of votes , 100% for Biden with zero down ballot votes in MI, WI and PA. This shows you how arrogant and stupid they think 76,000,000 million of us are. They are exposed now and nothing can stop the Trump Train from rolling over all of them and their Fake News cohorts.

58
meteorknife 58 points ago +58 / -0

Everyone else here is wrong. Their algorithm didnt work because it was applied to Republican voters. They didnt expect the number of cross party voters to vote for Trump.

35
deleted 35 points ago +35 / -0
10
ThePowerOfPrayer 10 points ago +10 / -0

So how is everyone else here wrong? Trump broke the algorithm because he broke through the brainwashing and grabbed a sizeable chunk of Black and Latino voters who traditionally vote Democrat.

5
Neonentity 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not to mention a ton of actual moderate white dims.

3
jetjetjet 3 points ago +3 / -0

They honestly thought that Biden was ten points ahead. Even though people were getting screamed at for voting Trump so a large number of them lied to the pollsters..

17
AtrisFlex 17 points ago +17 / -0

When all is said and done I’m betting on 100 million of us.

1
Neonentity 1 point ago +1 / -0

And we ain't goin' nowhere, to coin a phrase.

69
SJBHamilton 69 points ago +69 / -0

Yes, the Trump blowout CRASHED the STEAL !

36
CrackaJack 36 points ago +36 / -0

IT WAS A TRAP! LOL

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
55
Droford 55 points ago +55 / -0

I honestly think all the other fraud is purposeful noise to cover up this. I just don't know how they can prove it

26
deleted 26 points ago +26 / -0
20
ChikfilaFan 20 points ago +20 / -0

If I've learned anything over the past week, it's that those people are Pedes and they are here

16
FuckYouAsWell 16 points ago +16 / -0

Numbers guys HATE lying.

Why?

It doesn't add up.

I'll see myself out.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
asparaghosi 6 points ago +6 / -0

If you allow him to stay, you encourage his type to multiply.

6
Neonentity 6 points ago +6 / -0

Unity over Division.

Especially Long Division.

2
asparaghosi 2 points ago +2 / -0

HWNDU

17
Niq000 17 points ago +17 / -0

I think they could hand count the ballots and compare them with the machine counts. One of the stickies had all the data, so it should be easy to identify which counties and/or precincts to focus on. One precinct in MI already discovered this right after the election which there's been a lot of glitch posts about

3
The_Expert 3 points ago +3 / -0

To make this simple as possible - They take all ballots and put them into a basic counting machine. it tallies ALL the ballots. say 4,384,920 ballots. But there were 4,592,045 votes. In the end, you are expecting more votes than ballots if they were just giving biden votes.

In other areas the machine was taking away votes from TRUMP and giving them to biden. So you would have equal ballots to votes. Thus these would need to be hand counted or run 100,000 TRUMP votes and 100,000 biden votes that were hand counted through, to make sure the machine is not rigged.

10
MississippiPede 10 points ago +10 / -0

You sue the voting software creators for access to the software. You then check to see if algorithms can be applied (via internet download possibly, like we’ve seen people claim that machines were connected to the internet for an update the night before the election).

If it’s possible that algorithms can be added, or if you find proof that algorithms were in fact added, then you’ve got your case right there that fraud was more likely than not perpetrated.

Then a judge can decide recourse. Redo election, throw out results, they can figure something out

4
QuantumReality 4 points ago +4 / -0

No it was a smorgusboard. They sprinkled a little of every kind of fraud in to try to make the President Biden stew. Trump just had too much spice in his Maga Motherfucking Chilli. Too Caliente.

1
jetjetjet 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some of the fraud is honest mistakes. Some of it is stupid individuals defrauding locally. The rest is Nancy Pelosi the cryptkeeper

40
Whitemarlin 40 points ago +40 / -0

“I don’t need you to vote for me”

3
esheki808 3 points ago +3 / -0

Gets asked question above 5th grade level:

"You should vote for the other guy!"

35
deleted 35 points ago +35 / -0
12
CrackaJack 12 points ago +12 / -0

At least 1.5m higher than that, so far.

9
Megascandal 9 points ago +9 / -0

Wouldn't be surprised if it was up to 5 million ballots digitally flipped or destroyed physically by democrat "poll workers."

33
CRASCH 33 points ago +33 / -0

If you are talking about the shiva analysis. This is what I first thought....

What it really says is as the precincts are more republican they steal more votes from them. The explanation is buried deep in the analysis so it is easy to see the x axis as time, it isn’t. It is sorting the precincts on the x axis (from left to right). The further right you go the more republican leaning the precincts.

Where they weren’t stealing votes were precincts that were heavily democrat. The reason is that you want to have a believable ratio.

29
keepwinning 29 points ago +29 / -0

Completely inorganic data as revealed in those detroit counties. Someone's thumb on the scale....

16
sn01no 16 points ago +16 / -0

you mean Stacy Abrams on the scale

11
glow-operator-2-0 11 points ago +11 / -0

Bitch breaks the scale.

6
keepwinning 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's a hefty scale

2
IneligibleBachelor78 2 points ago +2 / -0

This scale, specifically.

25
ChikfilaFan 25 points ago +25 / -0

Remember that time TD broke reddit algorithms and ended up owning the entire front page.

This election, it's kind of like that. No matter how many cuck Spez' tried to alter what was said

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
15
Moebius 15 points ago +16 / -1

It only takes about 6 lines of code to swap votes with a user defined variable in C++ or Python...

1
jetjetjet 1 point ago +1 / -0

You could do it in one line in python. It has tuples

14
Eris 14 points ago +15 / -1

Part of me thinks all of this was obvious on purpose, to direct our focus on it. Something else could be going on behind the scenes that is even worse. It just seems..too obvious.

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
8
-STIMUTAX- 8 points ago +8 / -0

My only fear is who exactly will investigate (honestly) and prosecute these people! If they don’t we must.

5
Neonentity 5 points ago +5 / -0

This reeks of the CCP. They own the DNC and the MSM. Any bets they are calling the shots here?

2
Whitedogs 2 points ago +2 / -0

It worked for Obama and Hillary got away with it undetected, of course it will work again with unpopular Trump. Like they said, If he knows it or not he will be leaving the white house

9
Sniff_N_Blow_2020 9 points ago +9 / -0

One hypothesis I’ve heard being thrown around is they knew Trump would win so they used obvious fraud to make it look like Biden won after election day. Either the fraud is clear and the courts throwing out ballots flips it for Trump, causing leftists to riot and not accept the results, or the fraud is clear but the courts can’t do anything and Biden wins, causing Trump supporters to not accept the results.

By making the fraud so in your face obvious they guaranteed half the country would be outraged and lose faith in our electoral system, furthering the divide between left and right.

This theory assumes the goal of tptb is to end what you and I know as America and install a socialist/communist system thereby giving them complete control.

5
Eris 5 points ago +5 / -0

That theory does make sense - however I think the left will riot no matter what, that's what they do now. I don't understand what the point would be of alienating all of the conservative families who pay a bulk amount of taxes. I suppose this could all just lead to martial law one way or another, and that's why trump is changing out several higher up positions.

1
jetjetjet 1 point ago +1 / -0

That doesn't make sense to me. The Democrats are addicted to power and smelling their own self richeous farts. If they saw a path to power without people fighting back they would take it.

China, Russia, the communists and Islam on the other hand...

2
Sniff_N_Blow_2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah I’m picking up what you’re putting down. Your last line is key.

It really comes down to what motives you contribute to Democrats in power. Is their goal to gain power in the current system or is their goal to implement a communist one world government?

7
Pappy_Gunn 7 points ago +7 / -0

There is enormous pressure to concede. All the media called it for Biden. All social media are censoring. Not just in the US; cuck world leaders are calling Biden to congratulate him. What you hear from CNN we also hear in Canada. There is no dissenting voice in the media. You'd have to be crazy to contest the election and this is what they are callingTrump, over and over, even trying to get the 25th amendment going. So, yes, it's obvious but they don't care.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
4
wernerziegler 4 points ago +4 / -0

THIS!!!!

11
PatrickDuffyLeg 11 points ago +11 / -0

Shitty algorithm go BRRRRRRT!

11
swimmingguy 11 points ago +11 / -0

Trump wave was so huge, they couldn't skim and delete enough Trump votes to win. I think Trump won at least between 75M to 80M votes, the most in US history. It truly was a red tsunami

11
Dankusama 11 points ago +11 / -0

The algorithm couldn't take all this winning. If it could talk,it would say: Trump broke me!

11
had-to-chime-in 11 points ago +11 / -0

We fucking broke it in 2016, and we broke it again.

Except this time they initiated plan B and stopped the count so they could create more fake ballots to count in their Decocrat-only centres

10
ProfessionalCourtesy 10 points ago +10 / -0

Office Space moment. They are going to be wishing for Federal "Pound You In The Ass" prison, once We The People, are done with these traitorous Democrats.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
1
IneligibleBachelor78 1 point ago +1 / -0

Might that explain the 6,000 votes given to Biden in that county in rural northern Michigan?

10
sickofaltspin 10 points ago +10 / -0

Like Superman 3?

9
Kavantar 9 points ago +9 / -0

And even then, it wasn't enough votes to steal it.. so they had to print more, not count others, exclude military ballots, register fake voters and fill out fake ballots; cast ballots in maiden names, harvest ballots, have illegals vote, and let's not forget the dead. Even after all of that, they could only manage to steal their win by a small margin.

8
Akula69 8 points ago +8 / -0

Idiots thought that 4 years of calling Trump supporters racists, Nazis, and getting them fired and killed would have no affect on honesty during polling. 🤡 S

8
ChilledCovfefe 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is what happens when you use the plot from the movie Office Space to do your fraud! I advise all involved to watch your cornhole!

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
4
dannydrak 4 points ago +4 / -0

Serbian, actually...

1
Neonentity 1 point ago +1 / -0

Venezuelan.

Dominion has its roots in lovely Caracas.

1
dannydrak 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, they're a multinational with a dozen employees in Serbia that they list as largely responsible for their election code.

https://youtu.be/ficae6x1Q5A?t=145

1
MAGA_Flocka_Flame 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait… i thought there were trade restrictions with Venezuela?

7
DeepDMingDeep 7 points ago +7 / -0

JPG highlights from Dr Shiva’s Michigan election rigging video:

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O7WAEv/highlights-from-dr-shivas-explos/c/

6
Financial_mom 6 points ago +6 / -0

So much good stuff on TD tonight but for me, this one wins the Internet tonight. LOL that was great. Sums it all up perfectly.

6
Grilledpepe 6 points ago +6 / -0

I thought they were supposed to be the smart ones

2
jetjetjet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Actual progressives are very stupid.

5
Hershey 5 points ago +6 / -1

Uh? They found proof of it? How?

5
Lioncat331 5 points ago +5 / -0

Wow! The Holy Spirit is at work! Thank God! 🙏

4
blakhart 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ever seen the movie Office Space? Where they installed a worm to steal a penny from every transaction but fucked the decimal point, and instead of wmbezzeling a little cash over a long period, got a hige amount of cash in a short period, and of course hilarity ensues.

This is the real life version of that. Aswe can see, hilarity is ensuing.

Remember the old maxim: "Cheaters never win, and quite often end up shot over a hand of cards."

3
not_a_shill 3 points ago +3 / -0

Alright so, when the subroutine compounds the votes it uses all these extra decimal places, things get rounded off. So we simplify the whole thing and we round them all down and drop the remainder. To our candidate.

Its very complicated.

Here's the complete explanation of how the software works. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZjCQ3T5yXo

3
Durdurdurkistan 3 points ago +3 / -0

the percentage of votes switched was directly proportional to the percentage of voters that were registered as Republican in their respective counties.

For a hypothetical example;

if a county was 5% Republican there were no votes switched from Trump to Biden.

if a count was 60% Republican they switched 15% of the votes

if a county was 80% Republican they switched 35% of the votes

This was programmed into the software - which is a feature for some reason (cheating cough cough)

The real "smoking gun" is Wayne County where they hand counted the ballots. This is the only county that is an outlier for the patterns present in counties that had voting machines.

It's so incredibly obvious what happened. The data shows that if a county has more republicans those republicans become increasingly likely to vote for Biden? C'MON MAN!

3
six5_SMK 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think you are fucking on to something.

3
Pierre_Delecto 3 points ago +3 / -0

This guy saw it coming.

https://youtu.be/ydpIwdhnucQ

3
no_further 3 points ago +3 / -0

Meme idea to the more creative: Trump breaks the algorithm like Kim K.'s Paper mag cover. or Pepe breaks the algorithm lol.

3
BillGateCanSuckIt 3 points ago +3 / -0

I guess they should have learned to code

3
IneligibleBachelor78 3 points ago +3 / -0

In other words, Trump broke the algorithm as badly as he broke the Left.

2
jetjetjet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Allegedly, yes. Which is why we need to push for voter ids, no mail in voting, and paper printouts for every voter machine that the voter can see to verify no cheating

3
LORD_RM 3 points ago +3 / -0

It didn’t break, it is working as intended. The issue is that they got unexpected input. The unexpected input being the tsunami of Trump support. Thresholds in the software were triggered and then started shifting massive numbers from Trump to Biden.

1
Neonentity 1 point ago +1 / -0

RED TSUNAMI

2
zxcv_qwer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can someone answer some questions for me regarding Dr. Shiva's analysis? So in Michigan, you can vote in one of two ways, making a straight party selection or voting individually by race.

And their precincts report not only how many votes Trump (and Biden got), but what form those votes took, i.e., how many votes Trump received via voters making a "straight party Republican selection" vs. voters making an individual selection for Trump in the presidential race? Dr. Shiva's graphs looked at the total Trump vote percentage minus the straight Republican party percentage and graphed that against the Republican percentage of straight-party votes in that precinct? So if there were 200 votes in a precinct, 150 of which were via straight party voting, and Republicans (and thus Trump) got 100 of those votes and Democrats got 50 -- and then an additional 50 votes which were via individual voting and of which Trump and Biden each received 25, that would show up on the graph as a point at 66.7% on the x-axis (i.e., Trump's percentage of straight party voting, i.e., 100*150/200) and negative 4.2% on the y-axis (i.e., 62.5% - 66.7%)? Do I have that right?

The percentage of straight-party ticket votes for Trump is being used as a proxy for the "Republican-ness" of a particular precinct. Presumably you would get a similar result if you used different proxies for that quantity, e.g., the percentage of votes that were cast by voters who are registered as Republicans (or the percentage of total registered voters who are registered as Republicans)?

How well-established is the baseline as far as what this kind of graph "should" look like? They showed that Wayne county didn't have the pattern? But what about counties in other states? Or the same or different counties in past presidential elections? That seems like a pretty key piece of information in terms of proving that there isn't an innocent / natural explanation for the phenomenon, no?

1
semblanceofsanity 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm with you on that...

I need to see some baselines, and I need to see the entire state graphed, not just red counties and 1 blue county.

My take: Let's call anyone that doesn't vote straight ticket an independent. Let's say independents consistently break 50-50.

In a blue county, the straight ticket vote could be 80-20 for Biden. Let's say 20 percent of voters are independents and they vote 50/50. This would plot as 20, +30 for Trump.

In a red county that votes 80-20 for Trump straight ticket with the same 20% voting 50/50, this would plot as 80, -30.

In a split county, you get 50/50 straight ticket, and 50/50 independents, which plots 50-0.

That's a straight line at a consistent downward trajectory.

Shiva's "normal" distribution also such me as odd. Why should independents break the same as the rest of the precinct, or why should they be consistently +5% or -5%. In other words, why should independents break 80-20 in a blue county and 20-80 in a red county? I don't reach that conclusion at all. A blue county isn't blue because the independents lean Dem, it's blue because the country has more Dems and vice-a-versa.

1
zxcv_qwer 1 point ago +1 / -0

In a blue county, the straight ticket vote could be 80-20 for Biden. Let's say 20 percent of voters are independents and they vote 50/50. This would plot as 20, +30 for Trump.

Hmm, I don't think so. Wouldn't that plot as 20, -6? If Trump got 80% of 80% of the vote and 50% of the remaining 20%, his total vote percentage would be 74%. That minus the 80% of the straight-party vote he got would be -6, no?

Why should independents break the same as the rest of the precinct, or why should they be consistently +5% or -5%. In other words, why should independents break 80-20 in a blue county and 20-80 in a red county? I don't reach that conclusion at all.

I see your point. My gut response is that there are probably fewer true "independents" than you think. If most of the people in a precinct who opt to use the straight-party voting method are "fully Republican" enough to vote straight-party Republican, it seems to me that it's probably also true that most of the people in that same precinct who don't use that method are at least sufficiently "Republican" to vote at least mostly Republican, i.e., in this case, vote for Trump. (And I'd also imagine that at least some of the people who use the individual voting method may actually end up voting straight-party.) So I would expect there to be a reasonably good correlation between the two metrics.

1
semblanceofsanity 1 point ago +1 / -0

X is % Republican straight ticket

Y (I think) is % independent Trump votes - % Republican straight ticket.

So my example is 20% straight Republican and 50% of independents, which would be (20, 30). A county with 80% straight Republican and 50% independents would be (80, -30).

2
boogalations1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

The deep state's master plan ended up being the plot of office space.

2
ShakeYourTrumpThang 2 points ago +2 / -0

Didn't they ever watch Office Space?

2
snoopy3210 2 points ago +2 / -0

Six rallies in one day before the election for 74yrs old Trump paid a lot

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Bacontastegood 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well we said it would have to be a land slide for us to win. Looks like we did it Pedes!🇺🇸👌

1
AmericanGuy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Best comment of the night!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
tdwinner2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Truly a landslide.