Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
See heres the problem. By revealing these witnesses they do open up the witnesses to be intimated, but if they don't people are going to think they're full of it as they aren't providing evidence. It's a catch-22.
They are putting mics on the whistleblowers. They never expect that. Then it just gets worse. PV never gives out witness names unless they are given permission by the whistle-blower.
The intimidation got caught which is even better.
See heres the problem. By revealing these witnesses they do open up the witnesses to be intimated, but if they don't people are going to think they're full of it as they aren't providing evidence. It's a catch-22.
Who cares what other people think? After four years, I really don't care what people pushing "Russia!" have to say.
Update: Apparently WaPo lied (what a surprise) and Hopkins did NOT recant
Fox just broadcast the recant news on the radio.
Court takes months. We have only until Dec. 8 to achieve victory.
nobody would believe if they didn't go all in
It's the whistleblower's choice from what I understand.
It was a setup. We are demolishing the fake news.
You do have to play by some rules, when you are good people.
The accused is supposed to know who is accusing them.
Can't get anything to court without someone standing up with the evidence.
The more people who are brave and show evidence, then it will help so many others come forward.
In some ways, as Mr. Bobulinski, Mr. Tony Bobulinski showed, it is probably safer to get all the evidence out there.
Do it quick and loud, complete and very public.
They are putting mics on the whistleblowers. They never expect that. Then it just gets worse. PV never gives out witness names unless they are given permission by the whistle-blower.
This is a non-issue.
Nah. As long as they get the intimidation on tape, it's all good.