I still believe that Eric wasn't even the whistleblower. They didn't want people to know or talk to him because HE didn't hear shit. He allegedly overheard an entire phone call from across the room. BULL. SHIT.
The real whistleblower was an illegally obtained recording of the phone call, and the fake whistleblower Eric was fabricated and hidden to obfuscated the real source.
but didn’t it come out that the whistleblower was a former staffer for biden or something? and that he might have been implicated in whatever corruption trump was trying to unveil in ukraine? idk if i’m remembering that correctly or if it was even verified but if that’s the case why would they choose someone with such an obvious conflict of interest?
Yes, he worked on the NSC during the Soetoro administration, and because he was a Ukraine "expert," he worked closely with Joe Biden, and one of his coworkers also moved to Watermelon Head's staff. Plus he was represented in his "whistleblow" by the standard issue Lawfare agents, Mark Zaid and Andrew Bakaj.
The guy was completed tainted, for sure. I think that they had to get someone to play the role, so it had to be someone trusted and exposed themselves, and that ended up being Ciaramella.
I still believe to this day that the whistleblower was John Bolton, and that Trump and team gave him false information immediately after Trump's call to Ukraine about what was said. That gave him the confidence to go to Schiff and inform them that it was time to start the impeachment proceedings.
Trump knew he was going to be impeached regardless, so he set up a trap to get the deep state to do it over bogus intel about the phone conversation. Trump is a MADMAN!!
I still believe that Eric wasn't even the whistleblower. They didn't want people to know or talk to him because HE didn't hear shit. He allegedly overheard an entire phone call from across the room. BULL. SHIT.
The real whistleblower was an illegally obtained recording of the phone call, and the fake whistleblower Eric was fabricated and hidden to obfuscated the real source.
That makes way too much sense.
Hmmm. I’m going with it.
but didn’t it come out that the whistleblower was a former staffer for biden or something? and that he might have been implicated in whatever corruption trump was trying to unveil in ukraine? idk if i’m remembering that correctly or if it was even verified but if that’s the case why would they choose someone with such an obvious conflict of interest?
Yes, he worked on the NSC during the Soetoro administration, and because he was a Ukraine "expert," he worked closely with Joe Biden, and one of his coworkers also moved to Watermelon Head's staff. Plus he was represented in his "whistleblow" by the standard issue Lawfare agents, Mark Zaid and Andrew Bakaj.
The guy was completed tainted, for sure. I think that they had to get someone to play the role, so it had to be someone trusted and exposed themselves, and that ended up being Ciaramella.
I still believe to this day that the whistleblower was John Bolton, and that Trump and team gave him false information immediately after Trump's call to Ukraine about what was said. That gave him the confidence to go to Schiff and inform them that it was time to start the impeachment proceedings.
Trump knew he was going to be impeached regardless, so he set up a trap to get the deep state to do it over bogus intel about the phone conversation. Trump is a MADMAN!!