But he didn't look at every change. He only looked at the votes that switched from Trump to Biden. Scroll down in the comments on that post and you will see an alternate analysis.
He looked at every change going only one direction! He didn't also look at changes made from Biden to Trump. It was an accident I am sure, but this can't keep spreading. It harms out credibility.
Or what if they got so sloppy that they literally only make changes in one direction? I said to my friend earlier today that I'm sure there are republicans who get propped up with it to have controlled opposition but in this election they did not account for the fact of how much they'd have to cheat.
To be fair I agree and think we really need to understand the distribution of “votes switched” and “votes lost” b/t ALL candidates. There’s no telling what the true net loss/gain could be. Maybe if OP can run that really quick or at a min. clean up the definition around the logic for clarity calling out assumptions data set takes. I love this but support you in double triple checking our work/understanding
But he didn't look at every change. He only looked at the votes that switched from Trump to Biden. Scroll down in the comments on that post and you will see an alternate analysis.
I just don't want us to lose credibility.
He said he looked at every change. It sounds like you're calling him a liar. What is it about this that you don't get?
A double check that we've dotted our i's and crossed our t's is a good thing. I don't think he meant to be insulting.
He looked at every change going only one direction! He didn't also look at changes made from Biden to Trump. It was an accident I am sure, but this can't keep spreading. It harms out credibility.
if this is legit concern, have you tried contacting OP for a response?
Or what if they got so sloppy that they literally only make changes in one direction? I said to my friend earlier today that I'm sure there are republicans who get propped up with it to have controlled opposition but in this election they did not account for the fact of how much they'd have to cheat.
It doesn't hurt out creditability either way, no vote should be switched, period. This is a massive story either way.
To be fair I agree and think we really need to understand the distribution of “votes switched” and “votes lost” b/t ALL candidates. There’s no telling what the true net loss/gain could be. Maybe if OP can run that really quick or at a min. clean up the definition around the logic for clarity calling out assumptions data set takes. I love this but support you in double triple checking our work/understanding
I agree that this type of analysis is important, we can't rush to judgment.