Trump's lawyer started discussing George Soros on her show. Laura proceeded to try and debunk the claim, AND claim that there was too much of a "delayed feedback and she wasn't sure what she said"...
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Trump's lawyer started discussing George Soros on her show. Laura proceeded to try and debunk the claim, AND claim that there was too much of a "delayed feedback and she wasn't sure what she said"...
Ingram lost me last week when she was urging the man to concede. It was an act to get his base to follow suit.
Loomer and Tucker have shown their true colors. Damn shame
These people are only as loyal as the size of their paychecks.
If Laura doesn't tow the Fox line about Soros, she knows what will happen.
MSM personalities are probably held at gunpoint on this election narrative. The MSM is part of the Election Day Coup happening now and I wonder how many of them believe what they are saying or if any are reporting things against their will or under coercion. If a guest says Soros name during a live broadcast, anchors become visibly uncomfortable and react like they will get punished if they allow any mention of his name. In a battered spouse sort of way.
That's all true. Yet, they know what they know what's going on, and there's always a choice. They could walk away, or find some way out of their contracts.
What did Tucker do?
Everyone's mad that he's not covering the fraud today and changed the channel before he said at the end he's covering it tomorrow. He was quoted in a Newsweek article and everyone is freaking out because the headline is: Tucker Carlson says there's not enough fraud to change the election results, "We should be honest." All anyone seems to be reading is the headline (they should know better than to trust the MSM, but oh well). He also said in the Newsweek article (courtesy of TD.win user rjdf) "At this stage, the fraud that we can confirm does not seem to be enough to alter the election result. We should be honest and tell you that. Of course, that could change," (suggests they could find fraud)
""But changing the election results is not the whole point. The real point is that fraud took place, and that should horrify us." (ADMITS fraud took place)
" then you've got to get to the bottom of what just happened and you've got to do it as quickly and responsibly as you can." (DEFENDS the investigations)
", Congress ought to investigate every meaningful claim of illegal voting. Every legitimate claim that is raised must be investigated." (DEFENDS the investigations AGAIN!!!)
Loomer ? Missed it
turn fox newss off
True, wife wanted to give them a chance. Tucker and Hannity were great tonight. Laura was a disaster
Remember when Newt Gingrich was trying to mention the Soros involvement and Harris Faulkner shut him down?
Yeah. They've had their gag orders for a while now, it's just being more strictly enforced.
I haven't forgotten since I've seen it live. I've said it before, the monsters are coming out of the closet each day
Laura was being bitchy to the witness as well.
She has been insufferable tonight. She told Lindsay to stop saying his email address to support GA Republicans
I was only on Fox since Trump said to watch Hannity.
GF wanted to hear from witness but we regretted giving Laura Ingram views.
We switched channels when she started shilling the no evidence of fraud.
Theyre terrified of Soros. He's an agent for the british crown and the Rothschilds. Started his carreer working for the Nazis, stealing the stuff of other jews sent to deathcamps. Real fucked up.
Is George Soros he who must not be named or something?
Yeah I encourage you to look up Glenn Beck's explanation of "Spooky dude George Soros" he's a multi billionaire Globalist pawn who created, invests, and promulgates all kinds of nefarious PACs and lobby thoughts. He has his evil hands in EVERYTHING. DOMINION voting...him, BLM...him, Antifa(gs)...him. the list goes on and on
Sad