Goddamnit this analysis is wrong!! I wish it were this easy, but this is going to make us look dumb when it gets "debunked" by MSM. This really is an information war, and we need our credibility.
If you look at the python script, line 12, you can see that the script ONLY LOOKS AT DATA THAT SWITCHED FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN.
I am a software engineer. I don't use python, but you don't have to understand python to see what I mean here. If there was a check both directions, you would see another line like line 12, except with Biden and Trump switched places.
Please see the comment made by user fsvantesson for a more detailed explanation. He posted on the same thread, but it isn't getting the traction it needs.
Also kind of a side-note, I can tell the Pede (who meant well!) is a novice programmer by the poorly named variables. Makes the code difficult to read and no seasoned developer would write this way.
For the love of god please get the word out about this. It's getting quoted by journalists at this point.
Thank you for posting this. Actually both of the big pushes are not as slam dunk as they seem, since Dr. Shiva's analysis is defective as well. While I admit that there may be digital reporting fraud, it seems like most of the fraud is in actual physical ballots, which is the battle that Rudy is fighting.
On a side note, this very well meaning pede who did the vote switch analysis may have chosen a poor dataset. The NYT json data is so heavily processed and "lossy" that it will show all kinds of weird artifacts in analysis. Some other people scraped data from DecisionDeskHQ that seemed higher quality.