6441
Comments (291)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
25
ClownTamer 25 points ago +25 / -0

If nothing else, we have given media outlets a chance to prove they’re fake news.

Trump may very well not win the election. The court cases might not go through. Whole thing might go belly up. You never know. I’m rooting for Trump and think he has a good chance of winning this, but at the end of the day, you never know.

What we do know, however, is that at the very least, this is a massive newsworthy event. Never in recorded history have so many allegations of election impropriety and fraud been leveled. Never in recorded history has it been at a scale this large. Never in recorded history have we had so many damning, damning statistics proving that one candidates votes do not at all make sense. The very same equations used in the Enron case, but the IRS, and even the government to detect fraud all set off red flags for Joe Bidens votes. A closer examination reveals algorithmic skewing of votes in ways that simply cannot have occurred any other way.

Maybe it’s all true. Seems to be. Maybe it’s not. Maybe there are other explanations for all this. Maybe we all made it up? Doesn’t seem that way, and it’s all based on objective evidence everyone has access to. All the data is there, with more mounting. This isn’t even talking about all the affidavits signed and people testifying, or seeing people board up counting rooms and all that nonsense. A lot of that’s on tape as well.

At the very least, this should be the biggest story of any journalist’s lifetime, much like the Hunter Biden laptop. Maybe it wasn’t Hunter’s laptop. Maybe it was all deep faked to such an extent, even with the emails and texts and all that, that you’d never be able to tell. Doesn’t seem to be, and that sounds ridiculous, but maybe it is. Even then, it’s still a story. It’s still the news. You cover it.

This is the same stuff the guy that founded and now left the Intercept quit over. Because they wouldn’t cover the Hunter Biden story.

Maybe it’s all true. Maybe none of it is. Maybe Trump won. Maybe he didn’t. Maybe he really won and it won’t go through. Maybe all the court cases turn out well for him. Maybe they don’t. Doesn’t really matter to this issue. That it is not the headline of every paper is the creepiest fucking 1984 media blackout the world has ever seen.

14
Necrovoter 14 points ago +14 / -0

That it is not the headline of every paper is the creepiest fucking 1984 media blackout the world has ever seen.

There are no morally justifiable reasons for them covering up the voting fraud. Without honest elections we are just a breath away from the kinds of sweeping violent corruption we see in 3rd world countries. Who is going to stop them - the police that didn't stop any of the looting, riots or arson? The police that have been demoralized and are being defunded and losing many good officers that are fed up with this?

I think the MSM needs to go to prison for covering up the voter fraud. They get ZERO 1st amendment rights on this one. If the American people no longer have a right to vote, then the freedom of the press should be gone too. FUCK THEM.

9
RedBloodofPatriotism 9 points ago +9 / -0

Well and committing fraud on this wide a scale and buying out the media to push their agenda just shows the DNC as an enemy to the American people. Even if the courts don't rule in Trump's favor, Biden should never be president because we have seen the illegal measures they have taken to force their power over us first-hand.

11
ClownTamer 11 points ago +11 / -0

Although I agree, the establishment RNC is potentially in on it too. Guys like Romney and McCain. A lot of them immediately threw Trump under the bus.

2
HorpytheTiger 2 points ago +2 / -0

The very same equations used in the Enron case, but the IRS, and even the government to detect fraud all set off red flags for Joe Bidens votes. A closer examination reveals algorithmic skewing of votes in ways that simply cannot have occurred any other way.

Hey man, what equations and algorithms are you talking about? I'm a little uninformed on that stuff.

1
ClownTamer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bedford’s Law.

1
HorpytheTiger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can you explain further? Or link to some stuff?

1
ClownTamer 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s an equation people use to detect fraudulent data. Natural data has more 1s than 2s, more 2s than 3s, etc. Plotting the amounts makes a curve. All the other votes we look at fit the curve. Biden’s do not fit the curve. This in most contexts would immediately trigger an audit. Doesn’t prove voter fraud, but that the voting data has a high chance of not being real, as in it was algorithmically created or something else.