In Britain the Guardian is unlovingly referred to as "the grauniad" because they're so habitually inaccurate that they can't even be trusted to spell their own name right.
The evidence is right there below the headline - it's the fine print of donations to the EDF.
But the better question is, who cares? No one who's donating to fighting the election is going to mind some of their money going to pay off campaign debts, it's all going to the same end goal.
Funny how Miss Poppy Noor tries to write some shitty hit piece about Trump asking for donations to help with his legal fees, while at the very top The Guardian has a clickable "contribute" link to donate to their shitty paper.
Also don't get sucked into defending the details of the article. The question and point isn't the money. It has and always will be what's the money for? Which is a fraud challenge. So you ask.
"Wait, so is there or isn't there fraud?"
You kinda pick up clues on where they stand based on the answer.
"Of course, there's no fraud. That's a conspiracy." Okay, so possible MSM cock guzzler or leftist. Let's find out more. Point out a couple more inconsistencies based on who they are.
Basic ones are the pause on election night, updates at 4am only. Underperforming in all other blue metro areas, yet somehow overperforming AND MORE at all the key battleground areas.
You can sprinkle some more spice. How he over performed with minorities and LGBT communities. Massive rallies. Joe Biden being a walking word salad. Whatever.
Well... The title says "his" debts. Then later it goes on to state that it is for general election debt retirement. So she immediately has contradicted herself and discredited herself while attempting to slander POTUS.
The money all goes to the same purpose. They have bills to pay and now lawyers. Tell your friend that Joe Biden has hired an army of lawyers, over 600. And leftist organization and "donations" are far, far more nefarious and we have a real problem with these freaks.
This also falls in line with one of the media's ongoing narratives that the president is in financial ruins and a complete failure. They just write about his debt and make the word "debt" really pop while failing to really go into his assets or the complicated intricacies of running a business, especially one the size of the Trump organization. They do the same with his taxes without grasping that the IRS would have already destroyed him. They are all absolute fools and morons. You can try to tell your friend this in a nice way...
These people really shouldn't have jobs like this, they are dishonest intellectual cockroaches and piss ants. Total propagandists.
The idea that just because someone is wealthy they aren’t worthy of help is a retardedly socialist notion. I ponied up cash for the president in his hour of need and will forever be proud that I helped fund the cost of liberty in one of America’s darkest hours. I suggest you do the same
It costs money to hire attorneys. Sometimes they work now and get paid later, and sometimes you have to borrow money to pay people. Both of these examples are liabilities.
Sadly, President Trump himself CANNOT collect donations personally. It has to be done through the party for legal reasons. I’m sad they chose to retire the debt this way. It’s unbecoming and wrong. Freaking RNC
Yea, it's the site where you can donate to the cause because lawyers cost money and the left is trying to skew it any way they can because they're DESPERATE to demoralize the public. I say public because if you look at the numbers, 2/3 of the country has voted for the president at least
I was thinking that probably the campaign NEEDS to retire debt to receive new funds and so this is the way they had to legally set it up.
I have no basis for this but that's what I would guess just off the top of my head.
Anyone more versed in this can confirm?
Trumps personal debt is separate from his election campaign’s debts. When talking about his personal debt, all these biased media fail to include his assets which are huge. Anyone who has run a business know that a businessman will have debt as well as assets. No one builds towers and resorts worldwide without taking on debt. All this is personal debt /trump organisation debt that has nothing to do with elections.
When it comes to elections, DJTFP (Donald trump for president inc) also has debts because it has to borrow huge amounts of funds for campaigning, for doing massive rallies across the nation, for legal expenses, to pay poll watchers, challengers, GOP expenses etc. it’s not impossible that some debt has been taken for the purpose of the election campaign. The debt can even be legal expenses that the lawyers are willing to put on hold and charge later, but has to be charged to the election accounts of DJTFP. A portion the new donations go into retiring the debt, it can even be for legal expenses.
This is completely separate from his personal debt or wealth. Election campaign accounts are governed by election laws, are audited separately and have nothing whatsoever to do with personal debt. Nothing from the election accounts can or will be used for personal expenses.
It’s incredible they would confuse Donald Trump for President campaign accounts with personal accounts, and put out a headline that suggests the donors are paying his own debt. I doubt reporters are this dumb, and I can only come to one conclusion that is the article is yet another biased hit piece, that is aimed at preventing Trump supporters from donating to the cause. This is yet another perfect example of FAKE NEWS from the far left media that has been publicly trying to sabotage the elections with their biased narratives.
The campaign has made their donations more transparent than most any other presidential campaign. Junior has talked about it many times, at length, and with good references.
Explain to them all corporate donations to blm were actually to the Biden campaign
In Britain the Guardian is unlovingly referred to as "the grauniad" because they're so habitually inaccurate that they can't even be trusted to spell their own name right.
^
Reply to your friend with your concern that he is reading The Guardian unironically.
What is their evidence for any of this, the answer is none.
The DNC and the Clinton Foundation was massively in debt before and after. Even the Biden Campaign is in debt. In fact they're asking for Money now.
The evidence is right there below the headline - it's the fine print of donations to the EDF.
But the better question is, who cares? No one who's donating to fighting the election is going to mind some of their money going to pay off campaign debts, it's all going to the same end goal.
"The Guardian" is crap
Funny how Miss Poppy Noor tries to write some shitty hit piece about Trump asking for donations to help with his legal fees, while at the very top The Guardian has a clickable "contribute" link to donate to their shitty paper.
"Funded by readers."
It's the campaign
The Gaurdain is fake news
What more do you need to know?
Literally some socratic question works.
Also don't get sucked into defending the details of the article. The question and point isn't the money. It has and always will be what's the money for? Which is a fraud challenge. So you ask.
"Wait, so is there or isn't there fraud?"
You kinda pick up clues on where they stand based on the answer.
"Of course, there's no fraud. That's a conspiracy." Okay, so possible MSM cock guzzler or leftist. Let's find out more. Point out a couple more inconsistencies based on who they are.
Basic ones are the pause on election night, updates at 4am only. Underperforming in all other blue metro areas, yet somehow overperforming AND MORE at all the key battleground areas.
You can sprinkle some more spice. How he over performed with minorities and LGBT communities. Massive rallies. Joe Biden being a walking word salad. Whatever.
Anyway. Good luc.
Who is Poopy Nor?
It sounds unsavoury.
I used the British spelling, even.
Here's what you say to your friend: "With all due respect...go fuck yourself"
Well... The title says "his" debts. Then later it goes on to state that it is for general election debt retirement. So she immediately has contradicted herself and discredited herself while attempting to slander POTUS.
The money all goes to the same purpose. They have bills to pay and now lawyers. Tell your friend that Joe Biden has hired an army of lawyers, over 600. And leftist organization and "donations" are far, far more nefarious and we have a real problem with these freaks.
This also falls in line with one of the media's ongoing narratives that the president is in financial ruins and a complete failure. They just write about his debt and make the word "debt" really pop while failing to really go into his assets or the complicated intricacies of running a business, especially one the size of the Trump organization. They do the same with his taxes without grasping that the IRS would have already destroyed him. They are all absolute fools and morons. You can try to tell your friend this in a nice way...
These people really shouldn't have jobs like this, they are dishonest intellectual cockroaches and piss ants. Total propagandists.
The idea that just because someone is wealthy they aren’t worthy of help is a retardedly socialist notion. I ponied up cash for the president in his hour of need and will forever be proud that I helped fund the cost of liberty in one of America’s darkest hours. I suggest you do the same
It costs money to hire attorneys. Sometimes they work now and get paid later, and sometimes you have to borrow money to pay people. Both of these examples are liabilities.
Sadly, President Trump himself CANNOT collect donations personally. It has to be done through the party for legal reasons. I’m sad they chose to retire the debt this way. It’s unbecoming and wrong. Freaking RNC
If he was grifting for money then why would he donate his Presidential salary?
Eh I wouldn't worry about it. I honestly think unless he concedes he wins 🤷♂️
Tell him/her that these are VOLUNTARY donations and people are free to do what they want with their own money.
The left on the other hand only believes in force, violence and theft.
Yea, it's the site where you can donate to the cause because lawyers cost money and the left is trying to skew it any way they can because they're DESPERATE to demoralize the public. I say public because if you look at the numbers, 2/3 of the country has voted for the president at least
I was thinking that probably the campaign NEEDS to retire debt to receive new funds and so this is the way they had to legally set it up. I have no basis for this but that's what I would guess just off the top of my head. Anyone more versed in this can confirm?
Tell them that “BLM donations” were funneled through ActBlue directly into the dems coffers
Trumps personal debt is separate from his election campaign’s debts. When talking about his personal debt, all these biased media fail to include his assets which are huge. Anyone who has run a business know that a businessman will have debt as well as assets. No one builds towers and resorts worldwide without taking on debt. All this is personal debt /trump organisation debt that has nothing to do with elections.
When it comes to elections, DJTFP (Donald trump for president inc) also has debts because it has to borrow huge amounts of funds for campaigning, for doing massive rallies across the nation, for legal expenses, to pay poll watchers, challengers, GOP expenses etc. it’s not impossible that some debt has been taken for the purpose of the election campaign. The debt can even be legal expenses that the lawyers are willing to put on hold and charge later, but has to be charged to the election accounts of DJTFP. A portion the new donations go into retiring the debt, it can even be for legal expenses.
This is completely separate from his personal debt or wealth. Election campaign accounts are governed by election laws, are audited separately and have nothing whatsoever to do with personal debt. Nothing from the election accounts can or will be used for personal expenses.
It’s incredible they would confuse Donald Trump for President campaign accounts with personal accounts, and put out a headline that suggests the donors are paying his own debt. I doubt reporters are this dumb, and I can only come to one conclusion that is the article is yet another biased hit piece, that is aimed at preventing Trump supporters from donating to the cause. This is yet another perfect example of FAKE NEWS from the far left media that has been publicly trying to sabotage the elections with their biased narratives.
The campaign has made their donations more transparent than most any other presidential campaign. Junior has talked about it many times, at length, and with good references.