I don't see what this code does other than read the contents of a JSON file and print out the results. How was the data within the JSON file gathered? That's what's really important here.
Thats just the first couple lines by the looks of things; the output files aren't formatted the same way the csv output on that script it.
The first script seems to format the data in time based chunks; then the output shown isn't in that format. So it looks liek there is another script thats ran in between, or there is just more code below in that screenshot thats not seen.
This tweet is empty of meaningful content. The code snippet does not do anything meaningful and there is no code shown that would produce the claimed output.
Until something much more substantial is posted this is a rabbit hole. In fact it provides support for anyone who would say claims of irregularities are empty nonsense.
There is some skepticism about TrumanBlack's methodology here on TDW. It's BECAUSE I'm not a statistician that I take it seriously--to look at both sides. The skeptics sound like knowledgeable statisticians/IT people.
The first comment to TrumanBlack's post:
–fsvantesson 233 points 16 hours ago +247 / -14
PLEASE READ, THIS SEEMS TO BE FAKE/A MISTAKE/A RED HERRING!!!
And it will only make us look very bad. Unless I'm wrong, then please prove me wrong. But I dont think I am.
While the data provided is very interesting, the script that analyzes the data is inherently flawed.
It only checks for updates where Trump lost votes and Biden gained votes. It does not check for anything else, nor does it check for updates where Biden lost votes and Trump gained votes, and from what I've found, this seems to be just as frequent!!
I'm still analyzing the data, and I'm finding weird behaviour. The number of shifts from one candidate to the other, as well as the total number of votes shifted around from/to trump/biden is very off and all over the place. The data seems very chaotic and unreliable, and IMO cant be pointed to prove fraud in any direction (at least as of yet?)
Here is example results from pennsylvania using my script
-----
Total sum of votes gained/lost for both candidates
TRUMP TOTAL 3,318,694
BIDEN TOTAL 3,366,104
-----
No. times 'A' gained votes while 'B' lost votes
SHIFTS TO TRUMP 15
SHIFTS TO BIDEN 28
-----
No. votes that has been shifted
SHIFTED TO TRUMP 153,976
SHIFTED FROM TRUMP 220,883
SHIFTED TO BIDEN 174,057
SHIFTED FROM BIDEN 24,721
-----
Total votes gained and lost
TRUMP WIN 3,727,259
TRUMP LOSS 408,564
BIDEN WIN 4,004,035
BIDEN LOSS 637,931
And here is example results from ohio
-----
Total sum of votes gained/lost for both candidates
TRUMP TOTAL 3,072,524
BIDEN TOTAL 2,605,593
-----
No. times 'A' gained votes while 'B' lost votes
SHIFTS TO TRUMP 7
SHIFTS TO BIDEN 3
-----
No. votes that has been shifted
SHIFTED TO TRUMP 23,010
SHIFTED FROM TRUMP 14,965
SHIFTED TO BIDEN 1,092
SHIFTED FROM BIDEN 12,702
-----
Total votes gained and lost
TRUMP WIN 3,092,295
TRUMP LOSS 19,770
BIDEN WIN 2,623,227
BIDEN LOSS 17,634
I noticed the same thing with some PHP scripts I wrote to parse out the data when I was trying to find spikes of I unpicked downballot votes added in. Seems to be either some code not shown yet that’s catching a pattern of how things are switching to one side and being hidden. I will say this though, the data is chaotic and tons of negative vote tallies all over the place which reeks of someone “hiding” what they are doing. Quite crazy to think a tabulating machine would go backwards all over place, it’s just a counting machine, why would that ever be necessary?
Exactly... in the software world this would be way overly complex for no reason. More complex = higher likelihood of bugs, irresponsible coding. Also conveniently easier to hide more code to manipulate the data. Stinks to high heaven.
Not if you say we are not saying who votes were switched unto, just that votes were switched. We all know who cheats, and the courts can invalidate an election because its been seen to not be FAIR to both sides, if it can be proven votes were switched. The President can seize those DATA Banks if need be.
I think it's going to land at SCOTUS. Let's see, how much do you think Thomas likes Biden? How pissed is Alito at having these baboons waggle their red asses in his face? Never piss off the judge(s). We'll see. Fingers crossed so hard I might break a couple.
Has anyone analyzed the data with the known current glitches? For example I know Wisconsin is said to have far more than 5000 votes affected. I think people see numbers and are blindly upvoting. Need more due diligence.
I've seen a couple of pedestrians stating the code used to prove this was flawed, and that the votes glitched both ways while our proof only shows it going Biden's way. Have we investigated this?
Pride, their destructionis at hand.Those on the left choose to condone and commit violence... The Democrat machine chose to commit massive coordinated voter fraud.. the left has destroyed itself in pride it has destroyed itself by its own hand...
I am confused. Last night there were some posts saying this coding wasn't correct and would backfire on us. Can't tell if this is the same script. Different script. It just some psyoper seeing discontent
They stole some votes in FL. they probably started the algorithm and realized it was too late. That may be the key moment they realized they needed to stop counting
Can't win by stealing a lot of votes in a few states. Too obvious. You have to steal votes in all states you can so the races looks closer, so the flip is less obvious. Plus you get the bonus of winning the popular vote this way.
If Trump crushed it in every non swing state, and did things like made California decently close, would anyone believe that PA was close? WI? MI?
Where can I get this data so I can run some local races with this guy's code? I am very suspicious of rigging some races here, especially the congressional seats.
WE ARE THE NEWS
I’ll take a kitchen pass. Lunch time and I’m a hongry chonker
I don't see what this code does other than read the contents of a JSON file and print out the results. How was the data within the JSON file gathered? That's what's really important here.
Saw the same thing. Said they are posting the code set tomorrow yesterday, so would expect to see today.
https://twitter.com/SysEnfor/status/1326405411105288196?s=20
Thats just the first couple lines by the looks of things; the output files aren't formatted the same way the csv output on that script it.
The first script seems to format the data in time based chunks; then the output shown isn't in that format. So it looks liek there is another script thats ran in between, or there is just more code below in that screenshot thats not seen.
Or its fake and gay. One of the two..
Is this our pede?
yup
“Our data scientist”
LOL When I click on that link.. it is a hot mess.. Definitely not using the right program to open it.
If you open the NYT link in Firefox it will auto format the JSON for you. That too will not present the data in a clear way. Just better structured.
u/PedeInspector officially promoted to "Data Scientist"
This tweet is empty of meaningful content. The code snippet does not do anything meaningful and there is no code shown that would produce the claimed output.
Until something much more substantial is posted this is a rabbit hole. In fact it provides support for anyone who would say claims of irregularities are empty nonsense.
Saw the same thing. Said they are posting the code set tomorrow yesterday, so would expect to see today.
https://twitter.com/SysEnfor/status/1326405411105288196?s=20
That last sentence confuses me.
Yesterday they said they would post the code "tomorrow", so we should expect the code today.
(Better?)
Thanks.
I checked that Twitter account and did not see the code set posted....
There is some skepticism about TrumanBlack's methodology here on TDW. It's BECAUSE I'm not a statistician that I take it seriously--to look at both sides. The skeptics sound like knowledgeable statisticians/IT people.
The first comment to TrumanBlack's post:
–fsvantesson 233 points 16 hours ago +247 / -14 PLEASE READ, THIS SEEMS TO BE FAKE/A MISTAKE/A RED HERRING!!! And it will only make us look very bad. Unless I'm wrong, then please prove me wrong. But I dont think I am.
While the data provided is very interesting, the script that analyzes the data is inherently flawed.
It only checks for updates where Trump lost votes and Biden gained votes. It does not check for anything else, nor does it check for updates where Biden lost votes and Trump gained votes, and from what I've found, this seems to be just as frequent!!
I'm still analyzing the data, and I'm finding weird behaviour. The number of shifts from one candidate to the other, as well as the total number of votes shifted around from/to trump/biden is very off and all over the place. The data seems very chaotic and unreliable, and IMO cant be pointed to prove fraud in any direction (at least as of yet?)
https://haikatekk.se/fraud/fraudcatch.py
Here is example results from pennsylvania using my script
And here is example results from ohio
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/x/c/1BivibkdjK
This is a heads-up, NOT a troll, IMO. The stats need unassailable methodology to stand up in court.
I think the finding is still important. There shouldnt be any vote loses. They should all be integer values increasing. PERIOD.
I noticed the same thing with some PHP scripts I wrote to parse out the data when I was trying to find spikes of I unpicked downballot votes added in. Seems to be either some code not shown yet that’s catching a pattern of how things are switching to one side and being hidden. I will say this though, the data is chaotic and tons of negative vote tallies all over the place which reeks of someone “hiding” what they are doing. Quite crazy to think a tabulating machine would go backwards all over place, it’s just a counting machine, why would that ever be necessary?
Exactly... in the software world this would be way overly complex for no reason. More complex = higher likelihood of bugs, irresponsible coding. Also conveniently easier to hide more code to manipulate the data. Stinks to high heaven.
Not if you say we are not saying who votes were switched unto, just that votes were switched. We all know who cheats, and the courts can invalidate an election because its been seen to not be FAIR to both sides, if it can be proven votes were switched. The President can seize those DATA Banks if need be.
I think it's going to land at SCOTUS. Let's see, how much do you think Thomas likes Biden? How pissed is Alito at having these baboons waggle their red asses in his face? Never piss off the judge(s). We'll see. Fingers crossed so hard I might break a couple.
Has anyone analyzed the data with the known current glitches? For example I know Wisconsin is said to have far more than 5000 votes affected. I think people see numbers and are blindly upvoting. Need more due diligence.
The Rock County "Glitch" numbers don't look too be accurate.
I've seen a couple of pedestrians stating the code used to prove this was flawed, and that the votes glitched both ways while our proof only shows it going Biden's way. Have we investigated this?
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O8eYpG/attention-please-read-and-mods-p/
TRUST THE SCIENCE! Isn’t that what those four gender fuckers always recite everywhere online, and print on their ridiculous yard signs?
Pride, their destructionis at hand.Those on the left choose to condone and commit violence... The Democrat machine chose to commit massive coordinated voter fraud.. the left has destroyed itself in pride it has destroyed itself by its own hand...
I am confused. Last night there were some posts saying this coding wasn't correct and would backfire on us. Can't tell if this is the same script. Different script. It just some psyoper seeing discontent
As soon as the code is published I will take a look at it.
I know the snippet of code isn’t what looks for missing votes and switched votes or the part that outputs the results.
Here is a backup of the thread: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1326396385651023873.html
Why is Florida on there though?
FL was among the 30 states using dominion.
For some reason I thought Florida didn’t use Dominion.
https://i.maga.host/S5YF6gr.png
From their website.
They stole some votes in FL. they probably started the algorithm and realized it was too late. That may be the key moment they realized they needed to stop counting
Can't win by stealing a lot of votes in a few states. Too obvious. You have to steal votes in all states you can so the races looks closer, so the flip is less obvious. Plus you get the bonus of winning the popular vote this way.
If Trump crushed it in every non swing state, and did things like made California decently close, would anyone believe that PA was close? WI? MI?
So we've won Rhod Island?!?!
Patriots, I salute you!
Where can I get this data so I can run some local races with this guy's code? I am very suspicious of rigging some races here, especially the congressional seats.
Can't open tweet?
BOOONKED!