In the article about the suspected theft (https://archive.is/L41nF) machines were being programmed in the warehouse with USB sticks and then numbered seals applied when program complete. That article also said it was found that some machines’ numbered seals didn’t match but was brushed away as a logging error.
Hopefully they reviewed security camera footage (if there were any, the reporter didn’t see any) and verified software and operating system checksums on all unsecured machines.
If a bunch of high value targets are left exposed like this they should really immediately pivot to Digital Forensics and Incident Response. If they didn’t, I would imagine it could put any votes tabulated by those unsecured machines as suspect and maybe even thrown out in court. Disclaimer, IANAL, I’m a humble IT Security pede.
I have to spend millions (well I put it in the budget) to protect what amounts to phone book data; why do I have to go through such extradentary lengths to protect this sort of garbage; including hiring people specifically to walk around and make sure all the doors are shut....
But election data; no thanks.
Businesses ought to start suing the government over this sort of over regulation...
What if it was one of “us” that stole it to reverse engineer how they planned to seal the election?
What's with the green lights? Are those machines on? Why are a bunch of them uncovered?
In the article about the suspected theft (https://archive.is/L41nF) machines were being programmed in the warehouse with USB sticks and then numbered seals applied when program complete. That article also said it was found that some machines’ numbered seals didn’t match but was brushed away as a logging error.
OK, but there were a lot uncovered. Program a machine, cover it back up and move on to the next one.
I have a question, will these lawsuits affect down ballot races too?
Because i'm sure Sean Parnell was cheated from a seat in western PA.
I am not 100% on this, but I believe the down ballot candidate would have to join the suit or file separately.
As in our post that blew up showing vote switches and dumps hurting Trump, we don’t know if that affected any other candidate down ballot.
So John James would have to find that. Or join a suit that tries to get the whole thing thrown out.
thanks, this is what I would assume too
Archived ::
https://archive.is/czsWT
"""""""""""Stolen"""""""""""""
They’re trying to hide and delete the evidence of fraud
Seize one.
Hopefully they reviewed security camera footage (if there were any, the reporter didn’t see any) and verified software and operating system checksums on all unsecured machines.
If a bunch of high value targets are left exposed like this they should really immediately pivot to Digital Forensics and Incident Response. If they didn’t, I would imagine it could put any votes tabulated by those unsecured machines as suspect and maybe even thrown out in court. Disclaimer, IANAL, I’m a humble IT Security pede.
Even stealing a shopping cart costs you a quarter at aldis
How do people watch this then claim we have secure voting machines?
I have to spend millions (well I put it in the budget) to protect what amounts to phone book data; why do I have to go through such extradentary lengths to protect this sort of garbage; including hiring people specifically to walk around and make sure all the doors are shut....
But election data; no thanks.
Businesses ought to start suing the government over this sort of over regulation...