1342
Comments (53)
sorted by:
47
Thermopylae_MMXX [S] 47 points ago +47 / -0

40 workers, over a 24 hour period, scanning stacks of 50 ballots multiple times to count as real votes into the 500s

21
DrCowboyPresident 21 points ago +21 / -0

WE CAUGHT THOSE FILTHY CORRUPT RIGGERS RED HANDED AND THEY ARE GOING TO PAY!

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
5
Intothewind82 5 points ago +5 / -0

Glitch, you better watch yo mouth!!!

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
remember1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hacka please

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
RighttheWrong 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ha, ha, ha. Nice.

3
chlofefe 3 points ago +3 / -0

That would explain how the Benford analysis is showing an unusually high number of 5's

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
36
six5_SMK 36 points ago +36 / -0

I have trouble trusting what a Dominion Employee says. Make it sound like a mechanical exploitation by local employees. This throws people off the scent of the algorithm. They need the algorithm to survive this election, because they use it all over the world.

18
undef 18 points ago +18 / -0

"Get both"

Fraud by the workers and fraud inherent in the system.

16
DJFG 16 points ago +16 / -0

Even if she's a plant to throw people off of the scent of the algorithm, she's creating pressure on more people to flip as the spotlight gets hotter.

Get both.

4
LiberalismIsTheVirus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Agreed with this. They cheated from multiple different avenues so this isn't a simple process of just declaring it as an algorithm problem especially when we already know there have been plenty of human meddling in play. People are starting to get scared so hopefully the truth will come out. Hopefully the big players who orchestrated all of this are caught.

5
Rustbeltkulak 5 points ago +5 / -0

Remember Dr. Shiva's team did not find evidence of an algorithm in Wayne County (Detroit). They found evidence of it in the 3 other Michigan counties they analyzed.

1
dahdahdah_dahditdah 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dr. Shiva's analysis was defective. The signal he interpreted as votes taken away from Trump as the county got more Republican actually reflected the opposite, since he was subtracting straight ticket Repubs from Trump-only. Straight ticket repubs include the top of the ticket, i.e. they are Trump votes.

2
PeteButtplug 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even so, if it's happening in Detroit, the numbers will benefit Biden. Walk those votes back and MI flips.

30
ColSandersRet 30 points ago +30 / -0

Pretty significant fraud in Detroit.

1
NeverInterruptEnemy 1 point ago +1 / -0

If what she says is true and the fraud (intentional or not) was that employees were feeding stacks into tabulators and re-feeding them, this would immediately be caught with a recount. And I mean IMMEDIATELY.

So I would have to attribute this to incompetence more than malice.

Which is still great, just need that recount.

21
Happyass84 21 points ago +21 / -0

Whew, watching that was like pulling stuck ballots out of a tabulator...

1
DonnieT 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hahah my thoughts exactly. Good lord...

21
Darksunspeaks 21 points ago +22 / -1

This needs to hit the front page! UPVOTE PATRIOTS AND SHARE! Do your part in the meme army, get up boys and girls let’s do this!

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
9
Bravo1 9 points ago +9 / -0

What kind of shit system is that that allows duplication without a validation

7
Generaallucas 7 points ago +7 / -0

This. The system should've refused the action

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
6
Harambesbegottenson 6 points ago +6 / -0

Correct. 4 and 5. which if you have a hot stack (50) of all or mostly biden ballots, this would be the reasoning if theyre running them through multiple times. However, I am yet to see it clarified where the numbers that are being applied to benford's law are coming from? Is it the individual batches running through the machines? Is it compiled totals being reported? I have no idea.

7
M_DMA 7 points ago +7 / -0

Sticky

6
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 6 points ago +6 / -0

Wait, she sounds like she was just a poll watcher. Are we sure this is the Dominion whistle blower that Rudy mentioned?

5
acasper 5 points ago +5 / -0

Is this the one that was originally on dlive?

5
CitizenPlain 5 points ago +5 / -0

Here is another scheme! Wow so easy to commit fraud. Have a batch of 50 votes for your candidate, then repeatedly count them over and over. Crazy.

To the top!

3
haolecoder 3 points ago +3 / -0

I can’t tell if the worker in her story scanning the 500 ballots was doing it on purpose or just a fucking idiot. Either way this is a big story that definitely proves there were shenanigans in the vote counting.

2
Trump2011 2 points ago +2 / -0

She has a background in cyber-security? She sounds drunk. Not buying it.

2
durkadurka 2 points ago +2 / -0

Spit it out woman!

2
Erikabodereka 2 points ago +2 / -0

I made it 1:20 and quit.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
gnomenclature 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mods, this should be stickied.

1
DonnieT 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jesus this lady really struggled to get her story out. Not the greatest person to put on a witness stand but her story itself is massive.

1
dahdahdah_dahditdah 1 point ago +1 / -0

What state was she working in? Seems important.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Skippy737 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was waiting for her to take a drink of wine during her explanation. I was shocked she didnt

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Shakakka99 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't these ballots have a unique barcode or ID# on each one? Something that would preclude them from being counted twice?

Something like that would be a no-brainer, no?

1
Deploribus-unum 1 point ago +1 / -0

THIS IS NOT A DOMINION WHISTLEBLOWER!!

I want this to be, but it's not.

PLEASE STOP OVER-PROMISING WITH THESE POST TITLES.

1
Postal 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is that RedPill78?

1
Chibooms 1 point ago +1 / -0

T-T-T-T-TODAY JUNIOR!

1
TheMadManDidItAgain 1 point ago +1 / -0

Guarantee that the left will criticize her for touching her hair and call her a dumb bitch, and everything superficial... say she can't be an IT person.

1
HenkZeilstra 1 point ago +1 / -0

5/7 would bang

0
Endprism 0 points ago +1 / -1

What kind of voting system allows ballots that are scanned digitally mind you, to be scanned and counted TWICE? Can you say fundamental flaw?

1
dahdahdah_dahditdah 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are run in batches. If you do it right it all works. Sounds like the workers were doing it wrong in a way that fed lots of extra votes to Biden.

Also seems like a proper recount would discover these errors.