748
posted ago by pbm_ ago by pbm_ +748 / -0

They did a flat 5% change in the tabulations and that made him comfortably win with no need to add other methods of fraud. So no one looked into it.

Now that we know what to look for I am curious if we would find the same manipulation of the vote.

Trump talked like he knew fraud was a common thing when running against Hillary. What happened this election is not new. They just had to overcome a landslide that the 5.66% auto vote switch was not able to do the job by itself. The additional vote dumping and vote importing is what exposed them to this public audit.

Comments (57)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
pbm_ [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have been plugged into the elections since Carter vs Ford. The Obama run was the first I noticed where a candidate was universally pushed as the "one" by the media.

The media's influence may have been enough to have to got him elevated to where his vote numbers "naturally" hit what they did.

While I considered that as possible and likely probably, I would still love to see all of the election data analyzed from 2001 when the voting machines got put in.

I find it to be highly unlikely this is the first time it was ever done.