Simple Question: (Edison/NYT) Why do Votes come off the TOTAL vote tally, ever?
(media.patriots.win)
Comments (7)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
The machines have to scrape votes out of the total (from both candidates to make it seem like a "Glitch") to make room for the incoming fraud votes. That way voter turn out doesn't exceed 100%. In this case so many people actually voted it broke their scam system.
Right, but I mean from the point of view of a normie...let's pretend we're supposed to believe these machines are just counting votes and aren't cucked.
Is there any logical reason why the vote total would drop? Imagine the MSM asking that simple question?
I can't think of any reason this should ever happen. Counting bubbles with an optical reader depending on position is very very simple programming. This machine code has to look like fucking spaghetti to obfuscate what they are up to, and when you see the timeline, it's obvious there's some fuckery afoot.
So, you're a tech at, say, NBC and you're running that vote ticker on the screen, generally managing the graphics. I know it's got to be mostly boring, but you don't notice that it goes DOWN (in total) sometimes? Or that one candidate drops and the other increases? Like never, ever?
You're seeing two problems and slamming them together now, they have to be seperated to understand the problem. There is Vote switching that occurs... and then there is Vote Total Removals.
As I'm watching this it turns out Giuliani has whistleblowers from Dominion who are going to testify to exactly this.
Yes, there are two issues. The switching that happened during the evening of 11/3 - I haven't see that data, and I don't think it's out there.
DJT now tweeting about Dominion - it's going to be BIBLICAL.
Mail in votes are verified before they are fed into the machine to be counted (don't get me started on machines....), so why would the totals EVER go DOWN?
I'm not even talking about "vote switching" here, which is fishy as hell.
It may just be an estimate of incoming votes and not the actual count? My best guess
I don't think so, there's no reason to update an "estimate" every minute.
But at least that's a suggestion. I think there's no legit reason, in the end.