11354
Comments (923)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
12
ClarenceBeeks 12 points ago +13 / -1

“At this stage, the fraud that we can confirm does not seem to be enough to alter the election result. We should be honest and tell you that. Of course, that could change," he said.

"You can't have fraud in an election because then no one will believe in elections and then things fall apart."

That sounds like someone who hasn’t seen the good but believes that the problem is real and critical.

9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
4
they-see-me-trollin 4 points ago +4 / -0

any substantial degree of fraud should invalidate the election results... it means the system was severely compromised and this is just what we discovered in less than a week.

1
ClarenceBeeks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Won’t argue that. Let’s see how the first audits go. Could explode from there

3
williammcfadden 3 points ago +4 / -1

The courts deal with election fraud all the time. There are remedies, tossing ballots, audits, revotes, etc. There are laws, and there is the judicial branch, and the Media does not determine merit.

How much money can Tucker earn before he takes a real stand against the media mob?

The biggest story right now is the contested election. And Tucker pushing it aside greatly helps hand the country over to a mafia type group.

2
ClarenceBeeks 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also allows him to be on air a little longer to reveal the big news when it hits. You know they are just trying to determine when he should be fired.

It’s not ideal but he’s at least taking a reasonable stance while his colleagues are getting axed and probably intimidated

1
williammcfadden 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hannity has complete freedom to do what he wants and Tucker has the same.

-2
Kanxo -2 points ago +1 / -3

Oh brother. A guy speaks the truth and suddenly he's cucked? Need to check ourselves before we become them. "at this stage", "Of course, that could change". We're better than this, right?

1
ClarenceBeeks 1 point ago +2 / -1

I’d like to think so