She's sworn an affidavit. So if her story is BD she's going to jail... (though I guess if you are saying she is lying then that would be a lie too)?
It was so full of random unnecessary detail, personal names, little facts. If that was a constructed lie then she is a next level liar. I really don't know what issues you are seeing with her testimony.
Hannity axing her will be very easy to verify, and aligns with his recent tick-tock-nothing.
Glancing off screen. Shes at home, shes a mum. Could just be watching her kid. Or checking the freaking stream.
Someone was feeding her information at points in the interview, but that could just be so she sticks with her written testimony and doesn't say something wrong. It's not bad to be skeptical of things.
Shill much?
Nah. Just overly suspicious of everything: good news or bad. Someone else suggested he could be her lawyer, so that would make sense.
She's sworn an affidavit. So if her story is BD she's going to jail... (though I guess if you are saying she is lying then that would be a lie too)?
It was so full of random unnecessary detail, personal names, little facts. If that was a constructed lie then she is a next level liar. I really don't know what issues you are seeing with her testimony.
Hannity axing her will be very easy to verify, and aligns with his recent tick-tock-nothing.
Glancing off screen. Shes at home, shes a mum. Could just be watching her kid. Or checking the freaking stream.
video of her right here
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/798796260
Yeah, I was posting that everywhere. It sucks that .win seems completely uninterested in this massive story.
Someone was feeding her information at points in the interview, but that could just be so she sticks with her written testimony and doesn't say something wrong. It's not bad to be skeptical of things.
Her own homemade teleprompter to keep her story straight?
Who knows, but its where she rambles off a little into detail that no one who wasn't there could possible know. There's no way this is BS.