631
Comments (21)
sorted by:
13
Tryhardneckbeard 13 points ago +13 / -0

And if the Presidential race comes up fucked are they gonna move on to the Senate and Local Elections or are they gonna stop there?

  • The real question journos would ask this question.
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
Desperado 5 points ago +5 / -0

Dems are so fucked. With Republican challengers and observers in place, imagine the amount of fraud that's going to be uncovered this time around?

5
acasper 5 points ago +8 / -3

This is not a full recount. The counties will be picked for auditing meaning it can be subverted. Avoid this psyop and keep pushing for a full recount and audit.

EDIT :: You’re right. I’m wrong. I fell for a troll and I feel bad. Sorry pedes.

11
OsakaRaccoon 11 points ago +11 / -0

No, they explicitly stated this is a statewide audit/recount/recanvas.

6
acasper 6 points ago +6 / -0

You’re correct. I am incorrect. Thank you for refuting.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
2
Useful_Vidiots 2 points ago +2 / -0

A full recount, and then Raffensperger picks a specific race to audit.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-11/georgia-audit-to-trigger-hand-recount-of-presidential-vote

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
nc777 4 points ago +4 / -0

What is meant by recanvas for this state?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Kaledon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fascinating, I can't find any credible source for this. Do you have one?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Useful_Vidiots 2 points ago +2 / -0

Read this article in detail. Key text;

"Once county certification is complete and before the state certifies the results, the count must be audited. It is up to Raffensperger to choose which race to audit."

What exactly does that mean? It sounds like not all ballots/counts will be audited, but he gets to pick one race; Presidential? Senate? Other?

"Oh look, this one race over here came up clean. All good. Our work here is done!"

Read the details in that article. I do not trust this fuck, or this process at all.

2
DCdeplorable 2 points ago +3 / -1

I hope this isn't a way to just reinforce the "everything is fine" narrative. There's no chain of custody, so no way to definitively prove a vote was forged. Does this process check for dead voters, maidengate, CoA? No point to count faulty ballots twice... unless Dominion fucked up REALLY hard.

2
Dotmadhack 2 points ago +2 / -0

All counties, earlier I heard it was just a few. Great news!

2
_Donald-Trump_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t trust these people at all

1
CensorSpun 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just keep that gap toothed blowfish out of the process...

1
adam_schiff 1 point ago +3 / -2

I'm not satisfied with this weasel's trickery. Call it an audit because we're looking for fraud. Calling it a recount with a side of audit is very "diet coke". Its bullshit