Snowden also tried going through legal whistleblower channels before collecting and leaking documents, otherwise he could be construed as attempting to get the job to gain high level access for the purpose of leaking.
This lady also tried reporting through appropriate channels and was rebuffed. An IT worker wouldn't have access to source code. But you don't need source code access to diagnose a piece of machine not performing as expected.
Computers rely on numbers, they are "yes" or "no" there is no ambiguity, they don't and can't lie. If you write a program and it doesn't do what you expected it isn't because the computer is lying, its because it's doing exactly what it was told.
This IT worker noticed discrepancies with numbers not matching. You don't need source code access for that. Combined with how she saw the process being handled, she could only conclude the reasons were nefarious. As they rightly seem.
Give it time, give it time. Those people are considering their options which are narrowing each minute.
Witnesses are circumstantial evidence admissible in court. What is your problem?
It's not about software. All of you obsessed about software and backdoors are chasing your tails.
It's about people LITERALLY stuffing ballots into the tabulator and looking the other way.
That is how things are done.
Exactly. This is an easily ignored nothingburger.
We are running out of time.
Most of the irregularity she witness have nothing to do with code; they are procedural violations.
The code is far from the only story here...
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8ShNJlG/must-watch-video--redpill78--spe/
So was Snowden.
Snowden also tried going through legal whistleblower channels before collecting and leaking documents, otherwise he could be construed as attempting to get the job to gain high level access for the purpose of leaking.
This lady also tried reporting through appropriate channels and was rebuffed. An IT worker wouldn't have access to source code. But you don't need source code access to diagnose a piece of machine not performing as expected.
Computers rely on numbers, they are "yes" or "no" there is no ambiguity, they don't and can't lie. If you write a program and it doesn't do what you expected it isn't because the computer is lying, its because it's doing exactly what it was told.
This IT worker noticed discrepancies with numbers not matching. You don't need source code access for that. Combined with how she saw the process being handled, she could only conclude the reasons were nefarious. As they rightly seem.