2528
Comments (88)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
bluedevilga 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's one important thing he's missing. with his other rule about being able to run over people blocking the road, there is nothing about claiming money for damage to the car from the deceased estate.

2
DonnieRamesJio 2 points ago +2 / -0

ThAt'S WhAt iNsUrAnCe Is fOr

1
bluedevilga 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cuz it's free. I don't want my rates to go up if I kill three protesters, their families raised a moron, so they need to pay for the damages to my car

2
DonnieRamesJio 2 points ago +2 / -0

Could call it the Darwin Prize Forfeiture Clause

1
bluedevilga 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remember the Iranian government charged the family of protesters for the bullets. Why shouldn't they pay for my grill?