Many good things in this. Public FEDERAL statement by the appropriate top official. No sugar-coating in the statement. Statement made to NEWSMAX. Traitor media can suck each other's chodes.
If anything about the process is off, it should, and needs to, put the legitimacy of the entire thing into question. (opinion)
If scientific research was conducted and parts of their data were called into question, it would have to bring results into question. (improper methods result in skewed or false outputs)
What I think this is driving at, is not that "all votes were illegal and illegitimate" its that we cannot trust the outcome, regardless - therefore this may require a decision by the Supreme Court for example.
And I think most of us here agree - we're not looking for some official to come out and say "We weeded out all the fraud and Trump won!" as much as we're looking for them to say "Yeah this shit was fucked up and none of us should stand behind any of the results. We need to fix this moving forward and have better systems in place for America."
As far as how we come to a conclusion on fraudulent data of who is the president, well this is new territory for all of us, but I would assume it must fall to the courts or otherwise at this point.
Many good things in this. Public FEDERAL statement by the appropriate top official. No sugar-coating in the statement. Statement made to NEWSMAX. Traitor media can suck each other's chodes.
Deboinked because NYT called officials from all 50 states and they said its all good.
where the fuck have YOU been!?
Big tech has been shitting all OVER this election, and you stand up NOW!?
the wording of that is not good, he means the whole thing? even legal R votes?
If anything about the process is off, it should, and needs to, put the legitimacy of the entire thing into question. (opinion)
If scientific research was conducted and parts of their data were called into question, it would have to bring results into question. (improper methods result in skewed or false outputs)
What I think this is driving at, is not that "all votes were illegal and illegitimate" its that we cannot trust the outcome, regardless - therefore this may require a decision by the Supreme Court for example.
And I think most of us here agree - we're not looking for some official to come out and say "We weeded out all the fraud and Trump won!" as much as we're looking for them to say "Yeah this shit was fucked up and none of us should stand behind any of the results. We need to fix this moving forward and have better systems in place for America."
As far as how we come to a conclusion on fraudulent data of who is the president, well this is new territory for all of us, but I would assume it must fall to the courts or otherwise at this point.