7234 MICHIGAN COURT CASES LIVESTREAM - GREAT LAKES JUSTICE CENTER v. CITY OF DETROIT (www.youtube.com) posted 154 days ago by thatvegasguy77 154 days ago by thatvegasguy77 +7234 / -0 1303 comments share 1303 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (1303) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 57 ▼ – OGLaddie 57 points 154 days ago +57 / -0 I think the PA case is a slam dunk if it makes it to SCOTUS. Should make it to SCOTUS with ACB breaking the 4-4 from October and now that the issue is sufficiently ripe because, well, it happened. permalink save report block reply ▲ 5 ▼ – USMC224 5 points 154 days ago +6 / -1 Think ACB will recuse herself from any election-related matters? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 23 ▼ – OGLaddie 23 points 154 days ago +23 / -0 She shouldn't. The judiciary isn't supposed to be political and it would set a bad precedent. It would look like she thinks she owes the President. I think it's better for her to rule on the case even if she takes his side because she can always fall back on the law and the standards of ethics. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 9 ▼ – Kornstalx 9 points 154 days ago +9 / -0 You're 100% right, doing so would tarnish the rest of her career as "potentially biased". permalink parent save report block reply
I think the PA case is a slam dunk if it makes it to SCOTUS. Should make it to SCOTUS with ACB breaking the 4-4 from October and now that the issue is sufficiently ripe because, well, it happened.
Think ACB will recuse herself from any election-related matters?
She shouldn't. The judiciary isn't supposed to be political and it would set a bad precedent. It would look like she thinks she owes the President.
I think it's better for her to rule on the case even if she takes his side because she can always fall back on the law and the standards of ethics.
You're 100% right, doing so would tarnish the rest of her career as "potentially biased".