21 David Fink just defended transparency by saying a watcher was denied permission to compare signatures because signatures were compared BEFORE they arrived. Wtf??? (www.youtube.com) posted 154 days ago by eddedandedamame 154 days ago by eddedandedamame +21 / -0 4 comments share 4 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (4) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 2 ▼ – CoupCoupKaChew 2 points 154 days ago +2 / -0 I'm watching this, Fink is a complete liar...paid liar. permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – eddedandedamame [S] 3 points 154 days ago +3 / -0 "We can dispute the facts if necessary, but I don't think that's necessary." -Fink What??? lmao permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – CoupCoupKaChew 2 points 154 days ago +2 / -0 This guy's whole argument is squid ink! permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – CoupCoupKaChew 1 point 154 days ago +1 / -0 Janet Anderosn-Davis - what is she blah blahing? She doesn't want to preserve evidence? LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The City has no custody of evidence/ballots, subpoena all materials! permalink save report block reply
I'm watching this, Fink is a complete liar...paid liar.
"We can dispute the facts if necessary, but I don't think that's necessary." -Fink What??? lmao
This guy's whole argument is squid ink!
Janet Anderosn-Davis - what is she blah blahing? She doesn't want to preserve evidence? LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The City has no custody of evidence/ballots, subpoena all materials!