This is the law to use for full Social Media takedown. It is on the books already.
Maybe this will get the attention of Dorsey, Zuckerberg, Pichai (Google), and Suzanne Scott (FoxNews)?
18 U.S. Code § 2384.Seditious conspiracy
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
Heavy-handed, but possible maximum fine is 100% of assets.
I refuse to acknowledge him. I will not concede- I’m the true president-elect. You can tell because I’m wagging my finger in a condescending manner. Shame on you, you’re ruining the credibility of the media and establishment!
It was an interview by one of the whistleblowers who was contractor for Dominion. I posted it in reply to the "parent" comment but my comment got pushed way down below here. I learned about this video from another TD post.
First, they have to prove that there were enough ballot "irregularities" or fraudulent ballots that caused one party to win as a result (Joe Biden) to a judge by providing sufficient evidence that does more than just suggest, fraud took place think about sworn affidavits from GOP poll watchers and voters alike, dead people voting, video camera evidence of counters filling out ballots ,batches of ballots coming in that just happen to all be Biden ,computer "glitches" that just happen to only switch Trump votes to Biden votes ,recovered Trump votes found in the trash just to name a few all of these by themselves can possibly be explained away as a weird coincidence but compounded? Not so much.
Then they have to quantify these ballots to a judge by proving that x amount of votes were fraudulent or are otherwise illegible equal to or more than the difference between the amount of votes Biden supposedly won by in that particular state and prove that that many votes were Biden's. If they are able to do that in enough states, think about Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, Michigan and Nevada. Georgia already is doing a recount ,recanvas and an audit. They can take it.
The Trump team may have their work cut out for them at this point but it isn't so farfetched given the mounting evidence, it is absolutely feasible that the Trump team can flip enough states to win.
OK. Your second paragraph is important because it narrows the focus to an important point: it has to be shown that enough "irregularities" or fraudulent ballots were cast to have made a difference."
I can see that happening (as well as electors, defecting).
Everything
Trust me
It's 2020 and Shitposter69 is unironically more credible than CNN
That would be president elect shitposter69 to you sir
I accept your nomination
This is the law to use for full Social Media takedown. It is on the books already.
Maybe this will get the attention of Dorsey, Zuckerberg, Pichai (Google), and Suzanne Scott (FoxNews)?
18 U.S. Code § 2384.Seditious conspiracy
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
Heavy-handed, but possible maximum fine is 100% of assets.
LOOOOL, I almost spit my water :D :D
But did you pay a graphic artist on Fiverr to make you a fake seal logo???
Here's a list of people that have not congratulated President-Elect Shitposter69
I refuse to acknowledge him. I will not concede- I’m the true president-elect. You can tell because I’m wagging my finger in a condescending manner. Shame on you, you’re ruining the credibility of the media and establishment!
Lol, I think Elon Musk started something with his kid. We are going to start seeing people with real names like Shitposter69.
Respect his authority!
Sorry, I declared first
Well, I cheated the most!
Well to be fair even the spider in my room i squished a few mins ago is more credible than CNN
RIP spiderbro.
He had to go back
Soiderbro was a republican when he was alive, now he votes democrat, multiple times
f
We have the best user names don’t we folks?
So right my fellow Trump supporter.
Mine is shit
Always has been.
Truth!
Is Shitposter69 Baron
Expert confirmed.
Lmao I wish dude. My dad's awesome, wouldn't trade him but definitely isn't GEOTUS.
EVERY THING!!!
Including this: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/798796260
TL:DW?
It was an interview by one of the whistleblowers who was contractor for Dominion. I posted it in reply to the "parent" comment but my comment got pushed way down below here. I learned about this video from another TD post.
First, they have to prove that there were enough ballot "irregularities" or fraudulent ballots that caused one party to win as a result (Joe Biden) to a judge by providing sufficient evidence that does more than just suggest, fraud took place think about sworn affidavits from GOP poll watchers and voters alike, dead people voting, video camera evidence of counters filling out ballots ,batches of ballots coming in that just happen to all be Biden ,computer "glitches" that just happen to only switch Trump votes to Biden votes ,recovered Trump votes found in the trash just to name a few all of these by themselves can possibly be explained away as a weird coincidence but compounded? Not so much.
Then they have to quantify these ballots to a judge by proving that x amount of votes were fraudulent or are otherwise illegible equal to or more than the difference between the amount of votes Biden supposedly won by in that particular state and prove that that many votes were Biden's. If they are able to do that in enough states, think about Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, Michigan and Nevada. Georgia already is doing a recount ,recanvas and an audit. They can take it.
The Trump team may have their work cut out for them at this point but it isn't so farfetched given the mounting evidence, it is absolutely feasible that the Trump team can flip enough states to win.
OK. Your second paragraph is important because it narrows the focus to an important point: it has to be shown that enough "irregularities" or fraudulent ballots were cast to have made a difference."
I can see that happening (as well as electors, defecting).
Thanks!