9953
Comments (702)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
6
wolf_shitzer 6 points ago +6 / -0

First, they have to prove that there were enough ballot "irregularities" or fraudulent ballots that caused one party to win as a result (Joe Biden) to a judge by providing sufficient evidence that does more than just suggest, fraud took place think about sworn affidavits from GOP poll watchers and voters alike, dead people voting, video camera evidence of counters filling out ballots ,batches of ballots coming in that just happen to all be Biden ,computer "glitches" that just happen to only switch Trump votes to Biden votes ,recovered Trump votes found in the trash just to name a few all of these by themselves can possibly be explained away as a weird coincidence but compounded? Not so much.

Then they have to quantify these ballots to a judge by proving that x amount of votes were fraudulent or are otherwise illegible equal to or more than the difference between the amount of votes Biden supposedly won by in that particular state and prove that that many votes were Biden's. If they are able to do that in enough states, think about Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, Michigan and Nevada. Georgia already is doing a recount ,recanvas and an audit. They can take it.

The Trump team may have their work cut out for them at this point but it isn't so farfetched given the mounting evidence, it is absolutely feasible that the Trump team can flip enough states to win.

2
mateus 2 points ago +3 / -1

OK. Your second paragraph is important because it narrows the focus to an important point: it has to be shown that enough "irregularities" or fraudulent ballots were cast to have made a difference."

I can see that happening (as well as electors, defecting).

Thanks!