OK. Your second paragraph is important because it narrows the focus to an important point: it has to be shown that enough "irregularities" or fraudulent ballots were cast to have made a difference."
I can see that happening (as well as electors, defecting).
OK. Your second paragraph is important because it narrows the focus to an important point: it has to be shown that enough "irregularities" or fraudulent ballots were cast to have made a difference."
I can see that happening (as well as electors, defecting).
Thanks!