I am a Veteran who has the day off today because of Veterans day, so i took some time to do some analysis of the Minnesota results.
THEY STOLE MINNESOTA!!
they use something i'm calling the "2% strategy". Heres how it works:
-
do not let the 3rd party votes get more than 2.1% of the total percentage of votes in minnesota. I think they gave these votes to Biden over the course of the evening.
-
when that was failing, they did a "total adjustment" to all 3 candidates to keep Biden in the lead.
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 WATCH THIS VIDEO 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
video here explaining it: https://streamable.com/vd158c
raw data from the new york times: https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/minnesota/president.json
pastebin of the python code i used to calculate the numbers based off that data: https://pastebin.com/0DEyqBkW
csv file with all the data so you can use it in excel and look at it yourself: https://pastebin.com/YEHWZaZD (download and change from .txt file to a .csv file, then open it in excel)
SOMEBODY TELL THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN!!! THEY WON MINNESOTA!!!
EDIT: Good call out on the significant figures issue. Great work! However, that doesn't explain why the 3rd party count was adjusted down 23 times while the biden/trump counts were only adjusted down a handful of times each.
Also, note that the Trump/Biden percentages start at 29%-69% at the beginning of the evening, but by the end of the count have adjusted down to 45%-52%. AND YET THE 3RD PARTY PERCENTAGE NEVER DEVIATES FROM 2.1% THE ENTIRE EVENING!
EDIT2: I don't have twitter or social media or anything, so please help get this in front of the Trump campaign or anyone else who can help #stopthesteal !!
EDIT3: FOR ALL YOU PEOPLE COMPLAINING ABOUT ROUNDING ERRORS Why does the Trump and Biden percentages move throughout, but the 3rd party % stays at 2.1%??? https://i.maga.host/2Ym3Wv2.png Biden goes from a 70% lead to a 52% lead, Trump goes from a 30% deficit a 45% deficit. 3RD PARTY VOTES NEVER CHANGES FROM 2.1%
!!!PLEASE UPVOTE THIS COMMENT!!!!!Hey I took your data and found a pattern in the way that the votes were decreased! See these images.
I plotted the change in 3rd party votes vs report index (the order in which they were reported).
Plot 1: https://i.maga.host/7Tl0LSR.png This is all of the increases and decreases of 3rd party votes. You can see that the increases look like a lot of random noise (above the X axis). However, the decreases follow a very predictable pattern. These deleted votes do not at all look like random inputs or errors. They are following a predictable, reliable pattern and growing in magnitude over time!
Plot 2: This is just the negative vote deletions plotted, with some extreme outliers removed. https://i.maga.host/Xn8ILVB.png
I think this adds credibility to your argument. The deletions increase in proportion to the total number of votes cast, as would be necessary in order to maintain a specified hard limit on 3rd party %. This simply cannot be explained by random chance!