I am a Veteran who has the day off today because of Veterans day, so i took some time to do some analysis of the Minnesota results.
THEY STOLE MINNESOTA!!
they use something i'm calling the "2% strategy". Heres how it works:
-
do not let the 3rd party votes get more than 2.1% of the total percentage of votes in minnesota. I think they gave these votes to Biden over the course of the evening.
-
when that was failing, they did a "total adjustment" to all 3 candidates to keep Biden in the lead.
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 WATCH THIS VIDEO 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
video here explaining it: https://streamable.com/vd158c
raw data from the new york times: https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/minnesota/president.json
pastebin of the python code i used to calculate the numbers based off that data: https://pastebin.com/0DEyqBkW
csv file with all the data so you can use it in excel and look at it yourself: https://pastebin.com/YEHWZaZD (download and change from .txt file to a .csv file, then open it in excel)
SOMEBODY TELL THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN!!! THEY WON MINNESOTA!!!
EDIT: Good call out on the significant figures issue. Great work! However, that doesn't explain why the 3rd party count was adjusted down 23 times while the biden/trump counts were only adjusted down a handful of times each.
Also, note that the Trump/Biden percentages start at 29%-69% at the beginning of the evening, but by the end of the count have adjusted down to 45%-52%. AND YET THE 3RD PARTY PERCENTAGE NEVER DEVIATES FROM 2.1% THE ENTIRE EVENING!
EDIT2: I don't have twitter or social media or anything, so please help get this in front of the Trump campaign or anyone else who can help #stopthesteal !!
EDIT3: FOR ALL YOU PEOPLE COMPLAINING ABOUT ROUNDING ERRORS Why does the Trump and Biden percentages move throughout, but the 3rd party % stays at 2.1%??? https://i.maga.host/2Ym3Wv2.png Biden goes from a 70% lead to a 52% lead, Trump goes from a 30% deficit a 45% deficit. 3RD PARTY VOTES NEVER CHANGES FROM 2.1%
Lurking Data Scientists please verify.
I do data science and data engineering for a living. Here is the problem. We have 0 fucking clue how these data sets are generated. Is this directly from the tabulators? Is it a derived dataset through 3 layers of data manipulations and aggregations? How the fuck does a dataset on voting have negative numbers? It has no business being there. When we design systems.... we design test cases for things that should never happen to begin with and if those incidents are triggered I get support emails so I can figure out what the hell happened. Now.... given the video I saw from Dr. Shiva, the only plausible reason I can think of for a dataset like this to have negative numbers is if there was a feature like the weighted race functionality. I still haven’t figured out what kind of a legitimate use case there could be for a weighted race but let’s assume there is... If that were the case and you would have to include the negative number values to rebalance the numbers as you tabulate progressively......
Let me say that as an IT professional for 10 years, the state of info security and our transparency in our elections is abysmal and I have 0 doubt this race was stolen. These are gaps people “missed” , the gaps are intentional so it CAN be rigged. That said with this example my guess it’s one of few things... either it’s another “weighted race” scenario and it just so happened to hitting third parties accidentally a lot harder probably by accident... the big move against trump was probably the goal the third party shit was probably accidental that or it was slowly siphoning off third party to Biden , 2nd possibility is that the data entry was all manual and people kept fucking up but it’s an immutable log and thus you need to use negatives to correct the totals, or lastly someone’s buggy program generated the dataset and it’s all just garbage data.