8357
Comments (1090)
sorted by:
1308
Phins360_FL 1308 points ago +1310 / -2

so if they destroyed the envelopes, that means any vote counted after 8pm EST must be thrown out. Ergo. Win for Trump.

They violated the SCOTUS order yes?

794
wartooth6 794 points ago +794 / -0

Why yes they did

390
kornesque 390 points ago +391 / -1

Gracious. I suppose that's that then.

201
NeverInterruptEnemy 201 points ago +209 / -8

The Alito order does not mention envelopes. I have no idea if that was the intent or not.

Ordered to stop counting late ballots, and if counted separately stored. Doesn't say don't destroy envelopes but we all know why they would do that.

334
Phins360_FL 334 points ago +335 / -1

you need to go read his order.

he specifically orders them to segregate ALL mail in ballots received after 8pm EST.

PA did not.

It was a very simple and powerful order. No wiggle room. Alito is no idiot.

282
TheNewRepublic 282 points ago +282 / -0

That’s why Rudy said PA first, then MI. They have their battle plans. As soon as one of this flips it will be dominos. This is a large scale criminal activities across many state lines.

190
SordidPontification 190 points ago +191 / -1

This is a large scale criminal activities across many state lines.

AKA "Democrats."

57
Romanfun61 57 points ago +59 / -2

If it is widespread across state lines then Rudy Giuliani is the man for it. That would have this whole ordeal fall under RICO statute and Giuliani has successfully prosecuted under that

35
coderdude6598 35 points ago +38 / -3 (edited)

More ballots were switched and deleted by the software, and all of THAT evidence is in Republican strongholds counties. Don’t get too distracted by this other sideshow nonsense. That is the trap of this software fraud. It is not happening large scale in Democrat areas compared to the software glitches. It is happening in Republican strongholds where votes are being swapped to Biden or mysteriously being deleted from the tally. In fact, you could argue that some of the Dem city shenanigans were as blatant as they were to try to keep the software algo hidden.

Google engineers figured this out on Wed, I’m sure team Trump tore apart software and had the malicious code by Thursday. Looks like they have just been taking notes on all of the Democrat and Media crimes taking place for the last 6 days.

20
CeruleanShadow 20 points ago +21 / -1

Those people have no business using that word.

9
ACanadianInCanada 9 points ago +10 / -1

Devilrats

4
1337Gandalf 4 points ago +4 / -0

Demonrats*

73
Worldtraveler0405 73 points ago +73 / -0

Well said. PA has the most Electoral Votes (20) at stake. There was also an 800.000 margin, which has never occurred before in the history of US elections with 65% counted on the evening, and then, all of a sudden vanishing. Giuliani is like a Bloodhound. He picks his battles right.

47
EDKHimself 47 points ago +47 / -0

They said that the Ferrari that delivered votes in PA (along with the van and Chrysler 300) had out of state plates.

27
MAGA_Flocka_Flame 27 points ago +28 / -1

Wouldn’t surprise me if they were rentals

Car companies provided Biden with fake rally Jeeps, I bet they would provide transportation for fraud too

8
CuomoisaMassMurderer 8 points ago +8 / -0

If fraudulent votes were delivered by Ferrari why was the counting stopped for hours?

6
Fanakapan 6 points ago +6 / -0

Cant be too many Ferrari's in PA ?

What with the State Troopers running cameras, no doubt with automatic number plate recognition, it would be pretty easy to identify both the vehicle and driver in the vicinity of the counting centre that night.

14
nutup_orshutup 14 points ago +14 / -0

Also sets precedence with an easy proof state.

12
fu-greta 12 points ago +12 / -0

Why can't MI be tackled at the same time with PA?

20
Deplora 20 points ago +20 / -0

They're both being worked on. If PA actually violated the SCOTUS order, then they probably moved to the head of the line if they weren't already there.

14
tremendous_trump2020 14 points ago +14 / -0

Because PA is more of a slam dunk. The court is more likely to side with Trump there, and once they do the MI judge is more likely to follow.

6
Marshall 6 points ago +6 / -0

Each State is in a different situation. The case has to be ripe before the legal challenges commence.

4
Taupkek 4 points ago +4 / -0

Suits have been filed in both states. Team Trump is working simultaneously in PA, MI, WI, GA, NV, and AZ. PA and WI are probably the easiest wins. AZ might yet go for Trump without legal action, and either way will certainly result in a recount.

24
doug2 24 points ago +25 / -1

Sure they did. They segregated then right into the shredder. Order followed, see you in 4 years

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
5
Faffz 5 points ago +5 / -0

All official absentee ballots, files, applications for such ballots and envelopes on which the executed declarations appear, and all information and lists are hereby designated and declared to be public records and shall be safely kept for a period of two years, except that no proof of identification shall be made public, nor shall information concerning a military elector be made public which is expressly forbidden by the Department of Defense because of military security.

https://codes.findlaw.com/pa/title-25-ps-elections-electoral-districts/pa-st-sect-25-3146-9.html

17
KRosen333 17 points ago +17 / -0

Yes but was this the first order or the second order?

6
Hawkman 6 points ago +6 / -0

Do you have any idea how many ballots that would be? Enough alone without all the other fraud right?

5
jacquire14 5 points ago +5 / -0

Check the published count on election night all others are suspect

5
ontothefuture 5 points ago +5 / -0

Alito knows how dirty Philly is.

58
kornesque 58 points ago +58 / -0

I'm sure state law has something pretty neato to say about that.

85
Okiedoked2 85 points ago +85 / -0

The law says that they just keep all documents including envelopes for a period of at least 22 months after the election.

92
Kekintosh2020 92 points ago +93 / -1

22 months? I think that 22 week period is a bit arbitrary. However if we can safeguard them for 22 days then surely the 22 hour span is going to be fine. What is your point about the 22 minute envelope preservation recommendations? We just followed the 22 second order.

33
Skogin 33 points ago +33 / -0

...and they’re gone.

30
SordidPontification 30 points ago +30 / -0

I love the genius that went into this post.

13
deleted 13 points ago +16 / -3
7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
19
Ferrous_Tarkus 19 points ago +19 / -0

18 US Code section 2071

24
deleted 24 points ago +24 / -0
3
Ferrous_Tarkus 3 points ago +3 / -0

"(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States."

That's three years...

PER DOCUMENT

16
kornesque 16 points ago +16 / -0

"But muh state-run elections!!!"

24
Ferrous_Tarkus 24 points ago +24 / -0

Those envelopes are federal documents.

If they're destroyed then someone's gonna spend time in federal prison.

15
NeverInterruptEnemy 15 points ago +15 / -0

You are right, it does. All envelopes are required to be stored for two years.

HOWEVER.... I’m still waiting for find ANY source besides just one random dude on Twitter that says this has happened!

25
Trump-For-Life 25 points ago +25 / -0

I wouldn't want to be on the other end of the Supreme Court trying to argue that to Alito...

12
NeverInterruptEnemy 12 points ago +12 / -0

Agreed. Let’s hope it gets to the SC

10
NvJohansson 10 points ago +10 / -0

Lets hope there us enough fraudulent ballots thrown out for Trump to win or for Joe Biden to concede because he knows he's fucked before it gets to the scotus. Hoping for the last resort with no chance of appeal and final decision is always a coin flip.

16
Deatherage__ 16 points ago +18 / -2

The Alito order specified that the mail in ballots had to be kept separate right? Without the envelopes any ballots they set aside as a token to claim be the mail in ballots can be disputed in all likelihood. What comes from this, I have no idea.

14
JollyGoodFallow 14 points ago +14 / -0

Akita didn’t say go against state law. Envelopes are to be kept 22 months

4
CuomoisaMassMurderer 4 points ago +4 / -0

Akita? Lol. Did you mean to write that? I met an Akita puppy once. It stood with it's front paws bearing down on my bare shoulders, with it's head towering above me, plenty big enough to fit my head in it's jaws. I was on higher ground. I made sure not to show any sign of pain, but the weight on those claws HURT.

That was at 6 months. Shortly after it got shot by a neighbor who thought it was a bear, chasing down his horse. Dog kept on running, and was fine.

57
800080 57 points ago +57 / -0

so if they destroyed the envelopes, that means any vote counted after 8pm EST must be thrown out. Ergo. Win for Trump.

They violated the SCOTUS order yes?

Time to go proverbial nuclear? If that city can't tell the difference between valid ballots and fraudulent ballots and they caused this problem themselves, then Throw out every single ballot from Filthidelphia. If a city can't run a clean election then don't count any of their votes. Watch out fast they clean up their act next year. If the election was counted at the county level, then toss 'em there.

36
JeremiahKassin 36 points ago +37 / -1

Can't leave it up to them anymore. We need Federal election standards. The states can write their own laws, and choose how to ratify the vote, but there's a basic standard we need to lay down clearly.

21
SordidPontification 21 points ago +21 / -0

"Violators will be shot. Survivors will be shot again."

14
wernerziegler 14 points ago +14 / -0

Also, states wrote laws, which the Dems then got their judges to override just before the election, effectively legislating from the bench. Legislature defines election laws and judges do not have the power to change those laws at will.

12
Phil_DeGraves 12 points ago +12 / -0

There ought to be a law, NO CHANGES to election rules/laws/procedures/ANYTHING within 6 months or 1 year (or whatever) before the election day, otherwise 10 years in prison for anyone who attempts the change.

That'd put a stop to this blatantly-obvious Cloward-Piven chaos-creation horseshit the Dems pull with last-second changes.

7
wernerziegler 7 points ago +7 / -0

There should be strict election integrity laws set at the federal level that require voter ID, signature verification, and requires voter rolls to be actively maintained. All votes must be counted by the end of election day as established in the constitution. Early voting ballots must be counted before election day, not after.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Judges doing this will be shot. Then shot again, just on general principles.

5
Marshall 5 points ago +5 / -0

It seems to be a Prima Fascia case of equal protection violations.

3
ChuckedBeef 3 points ago +4 / -1

Pretty sure they're already is, that's how the Electoral College works because all States agree on a certain methodology come election day. Any states being allowed to count after the deadline risk swing the outcome of the entire election towards that one States political preference. It's entirely unconstitutional and every other state in the Union should be able to sue to invalidate those votes.

1
pepperconchobhar 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe that it's the US Constitution that gave the right to run elections to the states' legislatures. We can't just 'yoink' it from them without a Constitutional ammendment.

3
Ferrous_Tarkus 3 points ago +3 / -0

14th Amendment.

The other states are filing suit on those grounds.

Equal protection clause and all that.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, but what about zoinks? Those pesky kids ...

20
gillonba 20 points ago +20 / -0

This is probably the correct answer. If the dims want to act like spoiled children, let them go sit in the corner until they decide to behave

10
wernerziegler 10 points ago +10 / -0

And when they throw a fit and get violent, they should be reminded that it's nobody's fault except for the actions of the corrupt Dem-controlled election board in Philly that violated several election laws, as well as violating the voter equality protections of the people of PA under the law.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Reminding them of this may not be sufficient for handling violence.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
12
ajoed3 12 points ago +13 / -1

It will be in the hands of the lawyers and judges, but this would be the only appropriate response. Otherwise you can commit fraud, openly defying orders to keep evidence, and then get rewarded.

Alito ordering them to keep the evidence was intended to set them up for this. If they tried to hide it, he'll rule against them. If the kept them and there was no evidence produced in audit, he would likely side with them. I can't even imagine how a lawyer would defend destruction of envelopes here. I suppose it is a glitch of envelope burning, nothing to see.

8
Phil_DeGraves 8 points ago +8 / -0

I can't even imagine how a lawyer would defend destruction of envelopes here.

The lawyer could point out that it was okay for Hillary to willfully destroy 33,000 emails under federal subpoena (no charges were filed), therefore this should be okay too.

5
Hans-Moleman477 5 points ago +5 / -0

“But Hillary did it first, c’mon man!!”

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let the bodies hit the floor.

Then fill the graves

2
terriblemajesty 2 points ago +4 / -2

I was slightly concerned but after watching this video have more trust that Trump knows what he is doing

https://youtu.be/icb2VLMASIk

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ugh, how can you watch that dweeb? Nothing he said needed to take more than 20 seconds, yet it's over 20 minutes.

44
La5eR 44 points ago +44 / -0

Infact.... this could technically be a 3rd time disregarding a SCOTUS order.

23
HeavyHebrew 23 points ago +23 / -0

Man RBG dying really wrenched their plan

5
antimatter 5 points ago +6 / -1

What a bitch!

14
Phins360_FL 14 points ago +14 / -0

you are correct

31
SurrenderFreeman 31 points ago +31 / -0

Are you supposed to destroy those envelopes at all?

21
Phins360_FL 21 points ago +21 / -0

no

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
6
Miasmo 6 points ago +6 / -0

But did they intend to violate the SCOTUS order?

7
Phil_DeGraves 7 points ago +7 / -0

What's that, the perps are Dems? Well then, "no reasonable prosecutor" would bring charges, clearly!

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

With the path to hell they most certainly did. One rope for them all ...

110
deleted 110 points ago +111 / -1
139
deleted 139 points ago +140 / -1
67
deleted 67 points ago +69 / -2
28
WhitePowerRanger 28 points ago +30 / -2

Lol wut?

Ok then I don’t agree that I “violated” this girl last night and since both parties don’t agree, it never happened!

Dawg that’s the dumbest comment I’ve read on here in a long time.

Didn’t even need to edit, finished reading your comment as I was typing this and realized it’s clearly sarcasm 😂 YOU SURE FOOLED ME!

25
deleted 25 points ago +25 / -0
4
RedRanger 4 points ago +5 / -1

The White Ranger!?

4
WhitePowerRanger 4 points ago +4 / -0

Where have you been? Left me to fight evil all by myself and kicked me out of your group after kneeling to the woke 90s mob! I demand an explanation!

7
RedRanger 7 points ago +7 / -0

Bruh, I just left to get tacos.

Got lost. I'm sorry.

15
FireannDireach 15 points ago +15 / -0

Court orders are violence.

12
ScullyMully 12 points ago +12 / -0

"Order" is hate crime against those that identify as chaos-kin. smh

21
WishdoctorsSong 21 points ago +21 / -0

Thank you Bill Clinton

12
behemoth887 12 points ago +12 / -0

violated as in "biden violated multiple children live on CSPAN but that didn't deter the libs from voting for him"

and order as in "the libs ordered their peons to carry out their plans of voter fraud, and they obeyed."

7
The_American_Son 7 points ago +7 / -0

It depends on what the meaning of the word “is” is.

68
Barry_Obama 68 points ago +69 / -1

Violated like when Michael puts his behemoth in my raw, dry poopchute while I'm asleep without asking. But that's OK, I like surprises!

29
LaPastillaEscarlata 29 points ago +29 / -0

Damnit Barry, for the love of all that's sacred!

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
21
DeportAntifa 21 points ago +21 / -0

This is very funny but after careful consideration I am too grossed out to upvote

17
FliesTheFlag 17 points ago +19 / -2

my god I love this place and the shit that gets posted

Big Dick Mike

Michelle Obama dick clips

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7_Cwy5wRoo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSmOuX6DtVU

Joan Rivers talking how Michelle Big Dick Mike is a Tranny and Obama is Gay

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9C3SAdw-AA

https://www.bitchute.com/video/6Pk4OeHm35vE/

His Real Name is Michael Lavaughn Robinson

9
TrumpDynastyForever 9 points ago +9 / -0

They killed that YouTube account, plz tell me you have archives

10
Konsaki 10 points ago +11 / -1

Was wondering until I looked at your username...

18
ShmellyTunaMelt1 18 points ago +19 / -1

yes is a word that has long been invoked by far right white supremacists. and enablers of Transphobia.

8
Prometheus76 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yes

4
nodoxplz 4 points ago +4 / -0

Mr. Clinton, is that you?

4
cuckslasher 4 points ago +4 / -0

yes

88
MyTeenageBody 88 points ago +90 / -2

I really wish we could just nuke the democrat party and get it over with

51
CandyBarr 51 points ago +51 / -0

I just want a real score I genuinely think they would be embarrassed

And immediately lose 50% of their NPCz because they realize that the whole thing was just a scam

13
MakeAmericaLegendary 13 points ago +13 / -0

embarrassed imprisoned.

8
CandyBarr 8 points ago +8 / -0

Both please

13
Dave___Smith 13 points ago +13 / -0

Democrats have no shame. Even some friends of mine. The party is like an addictive drug, it brings out the absolute worst in people

6
anon1011101 6 points ago +6 / -0

I genuinely believe Biden only got like 30-40M real votes. Maybe even less. They got blown the fuck out and they know it

27
pyre2001 27 points ago +27 / -0

I'm at the point where I think the country should split. They can have their side with unlimited abortions, open borders, and 100 genders. Our side can live in basic peace by not shoving your ideologies down others' throats.

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
4
DontApologize 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes. It's the age old makers vs. takers argument. Dems are like gangsters who rule over the makers and takers - giving crumbs to their boys and taking a piece of the action everywhere else.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
DontApologize 1 point ago +1 / -0

The problem is they are mafia family that has entire government organizations that should be stopping them - working for them.

3
whatlike_withacloth 3 points ago +3 / -0

They can't, by their own philosophies, produce anything that matters. Ability and tangible value are anathema to them. "The most qualified person" is racist (or something), so they think "the most deserving person" (set by some standard other than competence)... which ultimately leads to a society of incompetence. And how they can't see such an obvious outcome is beyond me.

2
MichaelFrederickson 2 points ago +2 / -0

The people running this anti-Western-Civilization pogrom/op on the USA (and Europe) know it creates dysfunction. That's the point. It's not supposed to "work."

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
7
anon1011101 7 points ago +7 / -0

2020 was the year that the Left decided they wouldn't leave us alone.
"WEAR THE MASK!"
"SHUT DOWN YOUR BUSINESS!"
"STAY IN YOUR HOUSE!"
That was the tipping point. When they decided they had to tell the whole country to hop on one foot and dance for them.

8
SlumberBalu 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yeah, but actually, just take them with petty rule lawyering, we aren't the monster they think we are, we are the worst, we play so hard by the rules, they can bend over backwards and still loose!

9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Fffffffff 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think the saying is lay with pigs your going to dirtt

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
LaPastillaEscarlata 3 points ago +3 / -0

KEK

3
cuckslasher 3 points ago +3 / -0

helicoptering intensifies

50
trumpetdootdoot 50 points ago +50 / -0

Come on, man. Don't be a racist. MSM said Joe won.

30
TenScoops 30 points ago +30 / -0

ALL THE NETWORKS!

OMG ALL THE NETWORKS!

17
CandyBarr 17 points ago +17 / -0

Seems like racism to me.

After all white nationalism is the number one threat to America even though i know more more furries and transgenders and I live in The Bible belt

To be honest sometimes I get discouraged like I'm ugly or something I lived my whole life in the rural South and I've never once been recruited by a white nationalist i don't even know one

If they're the number 1 threat to America you would think that just 1 time 1 would come up to me and be like Hey you want to join our club?

3
Dieselslacker 3 points ago +3 / -0

This right here.im From what you would think would be prime area, and the only thing I ever saw was a business card, this goofy boy stole from his uncle's dresser.

They have the tightest opsec in the world is all I know, then. Then again I have never seen any violence attributed to them, in 20 years. Every once in a while, you'd see six dudes on the news doing a March in someones birthplace. That's it.

Prison type stuff, is whole different thing.

2
Dieselslacker 2 points ago +2 / -0

The card was old in the 1990s

4
DannySaySay 4 points ago +4 / -0

wait what saying Joe didn't win is racist now??

40
DonjuantheDon 40 points ago +40 / -0

They have likely facefucked themselves bar absolute cuckery from the courts

13
LaPastillaEscarlata 13 points ago +13 / -0

Maybe it's a way for dems to just take the loss without them being able to prove exactly how the fraud happened so they can't prosecute anyone for it?

13
-REEEEEEEDACTED- 13 points ago +13 / -0

This was the first thing I thought.

Losing > losing + going to jail

3
DonjuantheDon 3 points ago +3 / -0

I hope its not that easy for them

7
KristiNoemFaceFuck 7 points ago +7 / -0

Did someone say facefuck?

3
iamjohnwick 3 points ago +3 / -0

Username checks out

567
Zizou005 567 points ago +568 / -1

Innocent people don't do this shit. It can't get no more obvious

228
deleted 228 points ago +228 / -0
67
America_No_1 67 points ago +67 / -0 (edited)

There's not a prison big enough- we need an Australia 2.0

85
uzi5v2 85 points ago +85 / -0

Trump looking into buying Greenland is starting to actually make a whole lot of sense.

15
SirSeizureSalad 15 points ago +15 / -0

I'd move there. Long as I have broadband internet I don't care if I'm stuck inside for 8 months out of the year.

4
TempTrumpAccount 4 points ago +5 / -1

Long as I have broadband internet I don't care if I'm stuck inside for 8 months out of the year.

This hits close to home these days... still it's not been that bad.

3
anon1011101 3 points ago +3 / -0

We can throw all the Democrat politicians, journalists, and alphabet spooks into a big beautiful camp right in the middle of the Greenland ice cap.

30
TangerineShine 30 points ago +31 / -1

Antarctica, with no fucking parkas.

19
WhitePowerRanger 19 points ago +19 / -0

Only basketball jerseys with maximum ventilation

9
kag-2020- 9 points ago +9 / -0

Then fire hose them as you leave.

4
WhitePowerRanger 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ehh. Waste of water lol let em be penguin food

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
5
DeadMenSmellToenails 5 points ago +5 / -0

Only patriots get coats

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
SolidSnakeOil 2 points ago +2 / -0

TAKE THEIR COATS!

1
bigdickhangsright 1 point ago +1 / -0

Penguins did nothing to deserve to be overrun with democrats.

11
ALargeRock 11 points ago +11 / -0

Why spend the time and money on a treasonous asswipe?

I say a single round should do it. Hell, I’ll buy it.

7
GodEmperorUSA 7 points ago +7 / -0

Greenland!

7
Shempy 7 points ago +7 / -0

You know it’s funny you mention that I have proposed this. We spend approximately $50 billion a year in federal and state prisons, let’s just send everybody guilty of capital crimes and felonies to Australia and pay them $8 billion a year. Oh and they all lose citizenship as well

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
bantar 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is nothing unusual about destroying the ballot envelopes. The only verifying information that the enclosed ballot is OUTSIDE on the envelope. "Verify" the envelope, take out the ballot and all traceability is now lost. The ballot can be machine counted or hand counted. It does not matter. It's in the system now. Ballots without voter identification cannot be refuted.

So therefore, the process mandates that ballot envelopes be destroyed. After all, they are no longer "needed". This is a tried and true Democrat cheating method.

11
polyking 11 points ago +12 / -1

Only people involved in "matters". Destroying things like mail-in ballot envelopes and cellphones are just "matters". Check in with Comey for more details.

5
aintgotnotimefothis 5 points ago +5 / -0

Destroyed envelopes? Like, with a cloth?

1
SvixGale 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kek.

7
DystopianDoubleThink 7 points ago +7 / -0

Nope, but nothing ever happens to them "like with a clothe, smashing phones Side of Beef". They are rewarded instead.

3
Julia_J 3 points ago +3 / -0

What did the tweet say?

4
Zizou005 4 points ago +4 / -0

We're looking into it as we speak

3
Lanternsign 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unrelated but love your username

3
Zizou005 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks

262
deleted 262 points ago +262 / -0
103
Ninki333 103 points ago +106 / -3

So some underling with go to jail but the big fish will walk.

38
deleted 38 points ago +62 / -24
23
kag-2020- 23 points ago +24 / -1

Fact check: False. Many high fives will be given.

4
GrayGhost 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm not sure if you heard, but we've been doing some things.

12
justinjfit 12 points ago +13 / -1

which doesn't really mean anything, I mean, I have very low expectations for the SC, just look at obamacare.

8
hloblart 8 points ago +8 / -0

The swing vote there(Roberts) is now on the lefty 4 justices.

But I agree, the legislatures are the ones that choose the electors, and therefore they are the ones that need to be convinced. Though a favorable court decision can go a long way there.

Trump needs to lobby the state legislatures.

6
Oskar 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah. Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barret really fucked us on that one.

5
ESolveig 5 points ago +5 / -0

copied from another post of mine.

So if this hits the Supreme court, we have...

Alito, who made the order that got ignored. I've seen judges rule out of spite before, it's pretty fucking hilarious.

Thomas, who had his life and legacy personally ruined by that bald daughterfucker. Yeah, I wonder what way he'd rule.

Kava the beer-drinkin dude who got Clarence Thomas'd by the same group of people, including Kamala Harris, and worked on Bush v Gore (on Bush's team)

and Amy Coney Barrett, who also worked on Bush v Gore. Oh, and Biden is a "practicing Catholic" who supports abortion (which is to say, isn't really a catholic). fucking lmao

Thats 4 damn-near guaranteed votes there. pretty sure Gorsuch worked on Bush V Gore too, making it the locked-in five, but... yeah, so it goes

yeah, there's almost no way this doesn't win at the SC

3
Cadastral 3 points ago +3 / -0

Let's not imply that they will vote based on personal bias. I think they will rule based on the merits of the case.

3
GrayGhost 3 points ago +3 / -0

That was an incredibly-different SC.

2
thunder_wasp 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are three new Justices since then. There's a near guaranteed 5-4 conservative majority even if Roberts defects to the left, 6-3 if he doesn't.

223
vicentezo04 223 points ago +223 / -0

Why would you give Trump's lawyers more evidence of systematic voter fraud

153
KrayzieBoneE99 153 points ago +154 / -1 (edited)

Because they’d rather take the chances that votes are kept and they’re given some meaningless slap on the wrist. If they had kept the envelopes illegal votes would have been easy to prove. Now it’s up to the court to invalidate all the mail in ballots that don’t have an envelope to verify signatures, which they could do.

But the Dems know the odds of the Supreme Court siding with allowing the votes to stand is still greater than the risk of keeping envelopes of fraudulent votes. It’s literally a, “yeah, I didn’t follow the law but where’s your proof of fraud?” move. Desperation play but probably logically the only choice they had.

If the court rules against them they can gaslight the left through the media even more about DiSeNfRaNcHiSeD vOtErS. Which will either lead to 4 more years of bullshit investigations on how “Trump stole the election” or mass upheaval in the streets that will make the earlier riots look like friendly bonfires.

40
thedaynos 40 points ago +40 / -0

Yeah I agree with this. Also it needs to be said that any court, even SCOTUS, is going to be apprehensive against throwing out votes if they can't be proven to be fraudulent. Probably a really good play on democrats part to do this.

38
Blinker-Aerospace7 38 points ago +39 / -1

Which would just legalize fraud, which makes all future elections pointless until significant changes are made to the system, and disenfranchises every single legal voter

29
GreatFunana 29 points ago +29 / -0

Then the argument will be made we cannot verify the votes now in a highly contested election if they are valid or not. They destroyed the evidence, these votes must be thrown out because they simply cannot be verified at all now period.

On top of this, the violated court order does NOT look good for the Democrats.

Here is hoping the Scotus agrees.

13
BoatingAccident 13 points ago +13 / -0

If not, Trump has his people in place, and 100 million patriots who voted for him.

9
muy_libre 9 points ago +10 / -1

Standing back and standing by

1
Wfdeacon88 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then, trump drops the Dominion hammer and takes away 3 millions Biden votes.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
Wtf_socialismreally 5 points ago +5 / -0

If SCOTUS doesn't agree then they have been compromised completely.

3
d3plor4ble 3 points ago +3 / -0

If this goes to SCOTUS, Biden and Harris burn. Biden called Thomas a fucking rapist. Harris called Kavanaugh a fucking rapist. It will be the most excoriating and far-reaching legal "ass-raping" of all time.

1
FLYWHEEL_PRIME 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think you've realized yet that nobody gives a shit about legal voters.

1
Blinker-Aerospace7 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean, I'm just hoping that >1/2 of SCOTUS does, at this point I guess

3
tang81 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just strip PA of her EC votes due to fraud and being unable to legitimately validate the votes.

15
MAGA1775 15 points ago +15 / -0

Bingo. This way they can play the "disenfranchised voters" narrative even though its more likely it will get slapped down in court.

5
Yawnz13 5 points ago +6 / -1

If I remember right, they tried the whole "disenfranchised voter" thing back during a case regarding Sunday voting in...North Carolina I think. Court asked them to produce specific people who weren't able to vote because of the removal of one Sunday in early voting.

3
MasterOfIllusions 3 points ago +3 / -0

When "muh disenfranchised voters" clearly just means "omg no fair you're not letting us cheat," we need to just collectively say "that's nice, we don't give a fuck."

9
BoatingAccident 9 points ago +9 / -0

This is 100% their play and it scares me. However, one thing the SCOTUS could opt for is to order a REVOTE. It's happened before.

6
OconusLurex 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's happened before for other federal positions in state elections, but the constitution is very exacting about what is allowed in a presidential election, and my reading is that any sort of revote would be unconstitutional. The options are really include the ballots, throw out the ballots, or have the legislature and electors decide the vote.

9
PatLash 9 points ago +9 / -0

100%. They can now claim “lack of evidence” and rely on the assumed threat of civil unrest to coerce the Supreme Court to yield

7
Wtf_socialismreally 7 points ago +7 / -0

Mass civil unrest either way, SCOTUS should choose the one that actually protects the integrity of the elections.

3
GrayGhost 3 points ago +3 / -0

So threaten the courts and the American people with violence - the Democratic party in a nutshell, and exactly why we're throwing their asses out of civilization one way or another.

6
GreatFunana 6 points ago +6 / -0

This guy gets the game. And this deserves far more upvotes.

10
KrayzieBoneE99 10 points ago +11 / -1

I’m just happy I didn’t get a bunch of downvotes to be honest. It’s admittedly a fine line between “concern trolling” and realistically acknowledging that the dems are gladly putting the ball in the SC’s hands despite how much they’ll screech about it leading up to any SC ruling.

Even if they rule in our favor because the written law is on our side(and it looks to be) the Dem/Media are attempting to build a win/win long term scenario for themselves whichever way the SC rules. They didn’t put together “the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in history” haphazardly. They know exactly what they’re doing and shouldn’t be taken lightly.

24
deleted 24 points ago +25 / -1
6
OconusLurex 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yup, they're hoping they can coast on an incompetence/stupidity defense, whereas leaving it as it was would have made the malice and intentionality hard to deny.

10
BoatingAccident 10 points ago +10 / -0

longer rope

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
5
uzi5v2 5 points ago +5 / -0

They love losing. Only explanation!

151
deleted 151 points ago +158 / -7
101
deleted 101 points ago +104 / -3
100
KelVarnsson314 100 points ago +101 / -1

Because the fraud is so vast and varied. Frankly, it's a great problem to have if one is trying to prove that fraud occurred.

71
uzi5v2 71 points ago +71 / -0

It’s literally like those gameshows where they put you in the giant clear tube with a fan under you and money blowing everywhere and you have to grab as much as you can in 60 seconds.

35
deleted 35 points ago +35 / -0
15
DystopianDoubleThink 15 points ago +15 / -0

Ha ha, this. ^

5
flashersenpai 5 points ago +5 / -0

fucking hilarious

10
PraiseBeToScience 10 points ago +10 / -0

Also, Democrats have undermined the electoral system so consistently that it's very hard to "prove" anything, because the system is so laughably unsecure and crippled that there's no tracking, no accountability, no constraints on anything.

4
InarosPrime 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think that was intentional. More varied methods of fraud means they have to challenge each instance of fraud separately, requiring more man-hours and more court time. The goal of the Democrats may have been to overwhelm the courts with fraud cases, ensuring most don't get settled in time for December 14th.

26
Maga2020Maga2020 26 points ago +26 / -0

You have 1000s of people all doing shady shit in 100s of places while others are keeping the dozens of watchmen at bay or tied up in BS.

You would need 1000s of people 24/7 tracking and watching every ballot and every ballot box, they know you can't do it and simply cheat like crazy.

Its a total lack of honor and they know it.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Maga2020Maga2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

True

1
GorillaWarfare 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which is why every single civilized country in Europe both maintains an up-to date nationwide voter registry, and requires you to prove you are who you say you are when voting; makes it much harder to cast multiple votes at different polling places or cast votes in the names of deceased or nonvoters. US election systems are a fucking joke - by design.

19
HiddenDekuScrub 19 points ago +19 / -0

I'd argue that Trump is ahead of this. He's trying to drain the swamp, but he needs big, public proof so that every average Joe on the street realizes the swamp is real. Election fraud is one of those annoying issues that has always existed, and conservatives have always ranted about, and have always discussed good ideas on how to fix, but you never heard about it if you weren't listening to Rush Limbaugh or following conservative sites, did you?

To even begin to address these issues you have to drag them out into the light. If people don't believe they exist, you can't exactly campaign to have them eliminated, can you?

Trump basically forces the media to play on his ground, one way or another. He lives rent free in their heads. They can spew out as much propaganda as they want, but now sleeping people are going to start waking up and wondering what all the fuss is about.

143
dontbanus 143 points ago +143 / -0

Have faith Trump will win!

Be prepared for the worst!

God bless you all!

MAGA FOREVER 🇺🇸

28
8
WhitePowerRanger 8 points ago +8 / -0

Macho man Randy savage never disappoints.

(I typed that in his voice)

3
NvJohansson 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm prepared for the best possible scenario, pos lefties losing, freaking out and coming to my suburbs. It's gotta end one way or another, and this is as good a time as any.

128
Nannerbadnanner 128 points ago +128 / -0 (edited)

You can't destroy what didn't exist. There were likely no envelopes at all for the fake ballots. They probably destroyed some valid envelopes to cover the thousands that never existed.

69
ProudWhiteMan 69 points ago +69 / -0

And that's what a good lawyer would use to counter argue. NOW WE HAVE NO EVIDENCE THESE BALLOTS ARE LEGITIMATE SINCE THE INJUNCTION PASSED BY THE SUPREME COURT WAS NOT FOLLOWED AND THE BALLOTS WERENT SEGREGATED AS ORDERED.

Place the burden of proving those are legitimate ballots on the defense.

14
OconusLurex 14 points ago +14 / -0

Yeah, I think I've heard Rudy specifically say that the burden of proof would be on them to prove that they were legal.

1
atoftw 1 point ago +1 / -0

I always imagine the Trump campaign reading through these and saying "Hey guys, I have a new idea!" You'd think that some of them are on here. I mean, GEOTUS did an AMA on reddit once.

24
djmarcone 24 points ago +24 / -0

Good point. Maybe they're just saying they destroyed them because that's marginally better than saying there was no envelope because they weren't mailed because they are fake. (black guy tapping side of head meme)

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
4
thunder_wasp 4 points ago +4 / -0

On the Bannon podcast, Rudy said they have sworn witnesses who will testify the 4 AM "ballot dump" in Philadelphia involved plain cardboard boxes with thousands of ballots marked only for Biden. Presumably the people who printed those forged ballots wouldn't bother making envelopes for them.

2
ClarenceBeeks 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good point

117
patslimmy1 117 points ago +117 / -0

No envelope = ballot goes in the fucking trash.

20
BlindGuyMcSqueezy 20 points ago +20 / -0

Amen.

17
ohwens 17 points ago +17 / -0

If there is no envelope, then there is no proof there was ever a ballot to begin with.

-4
Maga2020Maga2020 -4 points ago +14 / -18

They have been mixed in with legit ballots.

The SC said to keep the ballots separate and they didn't do it (the SC said it twice)

ACB failed us on her first day in office, she turned into Session.

9
JohnScott 9 points ago +9 / -0

She said she didn't have time to review the case yet. Let's see what she does when it gets real here in a week or two.

3
Maga2020Maga2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes she choose to not rule on a massively important issue.

Her excuse is weak.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
2ASingleIssueVoter 3 points ago +6 / -3

That's the whole problem - she didn't vote for emergency stay (forcing PA to segregate the votes) and now we don't have the case, really.

3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
0
2ASingleIssueVoter 0 points ago +3 / -3

Yes she was, for the second case. Barely, but surely.

It was emergency relief request, not big deal. She decided not to get involved.

2
Maga2020Maga2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

She choose to stay out of the 4-4 Penn State ruling which is the core issue here.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
3
Maga2020Maga2020 3 points ago +4 / -1

She was on the court for the 4-4 vote, you can type it in BIG letters if you want.

She said she did not have enough time to make a decision but it was her choice not to weigh in.

So just change that reply to RIGHT.

1
duvalpede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then the well is poisoned All of Philadelphia's votes get tossed. Don't get mad at Trump, Philadelphians. Get mad at the Left.

2
Maga2020Maga2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

The SC will have to have the balls to do the right thing.

They are human and know if they do the right thing and toss the ballots, cities will burn.

Lets hope they do not cave to violence (humans tend to cave in).

-5
justinjfit -5 points ago +6 / -11

she took the knee to the LGBTQXYZ mob, that is when I realized she could mean trouble.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
113
OhShnigums 113 points ago +123 / -10

Something tells me the courts are just going to say we can't prove the votes were fraudulent now so everything stands... God I hope I'm wrong

68
DemsFuckKids 68 points ago +69 / -1

they will and then we take it to the supreme court from what i'm hearing

75
ontothefuture 75 points ago +75 / -0

Judge Alito ordered Pennsylvania officials to separate ballots that arrived after Election Day, he knows Philly is dirty.

32
emjayt 32 points ago +32 / -0

Does his bark have bite?

52
deleted 52 points ago +52 / -0
21
kag-2020- 21 points ago +21 / -0

That's what I'm thinking too. He's going to enjoy writing the scathing opinion that they can go eat the biggest bag of dicks on the planet.

8
Scottdelia 8 points ago +10 / -2

Alito's definitely does; the other justices, though... We know Robert's gets shaky legs for anything controversial.

22
DeadMenSmellToenails 22 points ago +22 / -0

Don't need Roberts for a majority

Alito

Thomas

Gorsuch

Kavanaugh

ACB

9
NormaJeanRocks 9 points ago +9 / -0

And 3 of them have been through this before

8
d3plor4ble 8 points ago +8 / -0

Not only that, if Roberts doesn't go with the majority, then Thomas gets to write the majority opinion. On the case against the guy who called him a fucking ape rapist.

3
DeadMenSmellToenails 3 points ago +3 / -0

Poetic Justice Thomas

3
_Sully_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

Alito was also there in 2000. He may know a thing or two about Election bullshit.

24
handpeople 24 points ago +24 / -0

Yeah, will have to see what happens in SCOTUS. You can never apply how the law is written and expect ruling to go in your favor. Unpopular opinion, but, we have 4 partisan SCOTUS judges and ACB (yet to be determined) and I hope she is partisan as hell.

32
Icetor 32 points ago +32 / -0

She shouldn't have to be partisan to side against Philadelphia. Any SCOTUS justice should 100% have a problem with how badly PA screwed with proper electoral procedures. It should be a 9-0 decision for at LEAST a full audit, if not a dismissal of every single vote tabulated after Alito's court order was issued. Why are dem partisans so awful at upholding basic standards of integrity??

16
handpeople 16 points ago +17 / -1

Thats where we are however. That good system you have heard about all your life, it doesnt exist.

6
JohnScott 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's a feature of the Dem picks, not a bug. They intentionally picked lapdogs for the Dem party that don't care what the law says and vote based on political winds in the Party.

13
Trump_Underground 13 points ago +13 / -0

If by partisan, you mean Constitutionalists, I agree. They read the law, and the law is what the law is. If you're supposed to save the envelopes for potential audit, then that's what you're supposed to do. I honestly think the Dems want Scotus to do their jobs, so they can go back to playing victim of the corrupt fascist system. It's their schtick and and they're schticking with it.

9
emjayt 9 points ago +9 / -0

Partisan? How about Constitutionalist

17
handpeople 17 points ago +17 / -0

Thats partisan now.

-8
Albion -8 points ago +5 / -13

Don't have too much faith in Kavanaugh.

21
deleted 21 points ago +22 / -1
4
SomaticallySpeaking 4 points ago +4 / -0

The decision will?

I thought her career was based on her ability to suck married cock... ?

1
DemsFuckKids 1 point ago +2 / -1

Not gonna lie u had me at first.

15
RonJoner 15 points ago +16 / -1

My friend, Kavanaugh will rule against Harris, given the chance, 10 times out of 10.

7
kag-2020- 7 points ago +7 / -0

And go have a beer afterwards and blast some boofs in their general direction.

0
DemsFuckKids 0 points ago +1 / -1

U know his wife in the background loving what’s coming

1
atoftw 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe Kavanaugh will do what is right and just, rather than just ruling out of spite. But it's nice to know that Kavanaugh definitely isn't in the pockets of the Biden crime family.

6
handpeople 6 points ago +6 / -0

Well, there is some ray of hope, we already got a 4-4 split decision that sent case back to lower court ruling. Same case. There was an agreement to review after elections with a full court. So that's a strong indicator we have 4 of 5 votes needed. By no means a definite, but strong enough.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
Albion 1 point ago +3 / -2

I'm sure he hates her for that and would spit in her face (or worse) if given the chance. He's part of the club though, and political theatre comes with the territory. Maybe he casts judgment based on his convictions, maybe he has deeper obligations to people we don't know about. I'm just saying be very skeptical when it comes to him.

11
catbertz 11 points ago +11 / -0

Say a prayer homie. Anything can happen once the court's involved. So much power in a select few hands.

10
TakingBackCA 10 points ago +12 / -2

Regrettably, this is the most likely result. Courts generally attempt to maintain the status quo (source: am lawyer). It’s possible SCOTUS may see this as a watershed moment, like Brown or Roe, and eviscerate these people, but you need to be prepared that the Court will simply handwave it away.

10
ClarenceBeeks 10 points ago +11 / -1

Simply handwave away the future of the western world? Hell no. Everyone knows they cheated. The Supreme Court is just going to hand over our destiny to cheating communists? And not to mention destroy their own court in the process? Not taking a stand on this case is suicide. They will rule accordingly

6
christianknight 6 points ago +6 / -0

Simply handwave away the future of the western world?

The powers that be pay alot to do this.

2
GarudaOne 2 points ago +2 / -0

Simply handwave away the future of the western world? Hell no.

If they're anything like my former pastor, yes.

"Learn to lose with dignity even when you're right" which was just "turn the other cheek" dressed up in fancier words and other BS like that is why I left that church.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
cciv 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, the courts are going to see if the election officials followed the law.

If the PA law says the burden of proof is on the challenger, fine. But if the law says that the ballots must meet certain criteria to be valid (say, having an envelope), then the courts will say those ballots are illegal.

2
OhShnigums 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well that would give me a huge raging boner my friend

92
atomisten 92 points ago +92 / -0

aaaand the tweet is deleted by twitter. they cant be more obvious than this.

35
hiddenpede 35 points ago +35 / -0

What did it say? Anyone got a screengrab?

21
MushBrains2020 21 points ago +22 / -1

It was a retweet of this: https://twitter.com/davidchapman141/status/1326593526868668417

Philadelphia has destroyed all ballot envelopes.

This will make identifying naked ballots and ballots arriving post election impossible. It will also make finding fraud in an audit very hard.

No source provided so I'm guessing Eric Trump found out it was false.

9
ACanadianInCanada 9 points ago +9 / -0

Since I can still view the original tweet and not the retweet, I am left to believe that their algorithm is not just targetting information with natural language processing algorithms but specific individuals.

I joined twitter years ago for some dumb fuck reason but never tweeted anything. When the election was a few months out I revived the account and started following people. The other day when https://mobile.twitter.com/stillgray/status/1325287431394914305?s=20 was posted I started playing around in twitter with language surrounding vote hammer scorecard and dominion. No censorship. But I never post nor do I have followers. I'm insignificant. We need to figure out by trial and error the censorship patterns, and inundate people with censored information

1
MemeLawd 1 point ago +1 / -0

Aaaannnd its gone

0
MushBrains2020 0 points ago +1 / -1

The tweet I linked to is still there but Eric's has been gone for a while.

8
Kramercalled 8 points ago +8 / -0

Someone posted this lower in the thread

https://i.ibb.co/W5MjWsn/10112020185953.jpg

1
RealRedneck 1 point ago +1 / -0

CCP bastards. I know we aren't into burning crap down, but ......

62
donald_lincoln 62 points ago +62 / -0

Yeah curious what this means for us

70
BoatingAccident 70 points ago +70 / -0

This seems to be the left's last effort. They figure to contaminate the entire vote will force the ONLY remedy to be for SCOTUS to disqualify like 600k votes and they are hoping SCOTUS will be too reluctant to put their hands into a state that deeply. It's their only play and it could work. SCOTUS makes me nervous AF.

47
Postal 47 points ago +47 / -0

I would be nervous as well, though a justice hit them with 2 orders, disobeying what appears to be both. If they don't rule harshly and to the law, they will set the precedent. I don't think Alito and others will mess around here.

37
deleted 37 points ago +37 / -0
11
Postal 11 points ago +11 / -0

Exactly. This isn't a local enforcement agency or a county courthouse, this is just slightly bigger and they know that if they rule in a way that favors the fraud and disobedience, it opens the door for people to use their ruling in the future.

9
BoatingAccident 9 points ago +9 / -0

Ideally, for our country to "heal" (and let me be clear, we were doing GREAT before all this shit... the dem rioters and BLM put us back 2o yeas in race relations)... but yeah, for our country to "heal" I believe a 9-0 SCOTUS would do the trick for even the most ardent normie. Only the true commies would be in revolt then, which is what we want. Even an 8-1 (Can't count on Sotomayer at all).

6
Postal 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm not worried about the vote, so long as they side with America. 4 more years of President Trump and we are literally disinfecting the swamp for good.

4
BoatingAccident 4 points ago +4 / -0

Agreed, but it would be nice to have a peaceful surrender by the less radical lefties.

3
Postal 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have no faith in the people that have called us Nazis, racists, bigots, and everything else in the book over the last four years even with all the evidence laid out in front of them. It's unfortunate because the true division has come from the left. At this point I have no desire for mercy and the system of the Democrats needs to be absolutely destroyed.

2
RealRedneck 2 points ago +2 / -0

even with all the evidence laid out in front of them.

Have you watched any legacy media? They will never see the evidence we've seen.

4
Lovepede 4 points ago +4 / -0

So to win a state in 2024, just insert two million ballots, make sure there's no direct proof to invalidate the votes even though every mathematician in the country is screaming fraud = SCOTUS will sit by and do nothing!?

24
vicentezo04 24 points ago +24 / -0

If SCOTUS cucks, the PA state legislature better be ready to not certify the election.

2
Sporadica 2 points ago +2 / -0

What happens if they don't certify?

2
vicentezo04 2 points ago +2 / -0

PA sends 0 electors. Read the 12th Amendment to see what happens when neither Trump nor Biden has 270.

11
6
BoatingAccident 6 points ago +6 / -0

There's no way he let's Biden name his replacement, and my guess is he wants to retire soon.

1
DeviousKid45 1 point ago +1 / -0

Link the archive version. 4chan links expire.

4
richmomz 4 points ago +4 / -0

That was their play in 2000 and it didn't work out the way they hoped, so our odds are probably better than most people think.

2
BoatingAccident 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good point. That makes me feel better. Plus with the old woman out of the way, now we have 2 accused rapists this time instead of just one.. and a newly minted religious zealot that hates women. All facing their accusers. I mean, I know judges are supposed to be impartial and all but...I like our chances :)

3
MakeAmericaGreat9 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree...Didn't I read a headline the other day that SCOTUS was going to uphold Obamacare again? I think I read that.

3
BoatingAccident 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well they aren't "upholding" it. But it looks like they are telegraphing that severability does not apply. If that's a constitutional ruling, I'm good with it, even if it results in Obamacare staying in place. We just need to find another way to get rid of it. There are a few.

15
monochromedout 15 points ago +15 / -0

https://www.dos.pa.gov/VotingElections/OtherServicesEvents/Documents/Canvassing-Segregated-Ballot-Guidance.pdf

The last line of the guidance says they must keep the ballot and ballot envelope.

3
justinjfit 3 points ago +3 / -0

who enforces this?

2
monochromedout 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, it's the Secretary of States guidance based on a ruling by a Supreme Court Justice.

I imagine it would be up to the Democrat administration to enforce it.

1
Tookens 1 point ago +1 / -0

"3. By statute, no challenges by authorized representatives or any third party are permitted during canvass of the mail-in and absentee ballots."

Uh.. wtf? Am I reading that right?

1
VinceVonVroom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you - needed to see that to confirm.

1
richmomz 1 point ago +1 / -0

So if they didn't keep the envelope then all of those ballots are spoiled and void under PA's own regulations - boom, Trump wins.

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
2
_-Th0r-_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

So the reason that mail in ballots are “safe” is bc while the ballots can be forged, the envelopes are coded very specifically.

But if you trash the envelopes, there’s no way to prevent a crooked group from bringing in extra ballots and just voila here are Biden votes.

No way to audit without envelopes.

56
Vivadiscordia 56 points ago +56 / -0

They really are just digging a deeper and deeper hole. No way they get out of this unless the deep state gets to the Supreme Court, and even then the Republican legislature can choose their own slate of electors.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
47
zvvx 47 points ago +47 / -0

Tweet deleted, what did it say?

9
Kramercalled 9 points ago +9 / -0

Someone posted this lower in the thread

https://i.ibb.co/W5MjWsn/10112020185953.jpg

1
TheFountainhead 1 point ago +2 / -1

Democrat have small peepee

41
jufrek 41 points ago +43 / -2

lol all the votes after polls close are going to be ruled out and thrown in the garbage. They did not expect donald trump to have a massive turnout and had to do a last ditch sloppy job to rig the already rigged election. These people are really dumb.

22
Kaiheitai 22 points ago +22 / -0

Yeah the massive turnout made them desperate. Their only choice is to go all out, then dig in, and use MSM, the Swamp, and big tech for a final protective fire.

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
5
WhitePowerRanger 5 points ago +5 / -0

“You are really dumb. So dumb. Fo real”

Antwon Dodson

5
WaxMyBallsBernie 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sadly I don't think they will. The truth is obvious to everyone with a brain, but incontrovertible evidence, which would be necessary to "disenfranchise" people, will be hard to come by.

4
Joeret 4 points ago +4 / -0

My fear is they won't be able to discern between legal ballots and illegal ballots. My biggest fear is the Dems get away with another "okay-now-we-know-and-it-won't-happen-again" excuse and PA falls.

We all know that the Dems have no morals and will do whatever they feel will get them into the White House.

4
sun_wolf 4 points ago +4 / -0

I mean a lot of this is just going through the motions now. The coup went hot on Election Night. Anyone on TV pretending otherwise is just a liar. Trump won in a landslide and right at the moment they were going to be forced to call it, the entire Election was frozen, across all the battleground states. That is it. Everything else is just talking heads playing pretend. It’s like the second plane hitting the second tower on 9/11 and every single news network says, “Whoa, crazy coincidence there!” And then the entire news media just moves on to some other story on 9/12 as if nothing happened while everyone calling for some kind of investigation is censored and fired.

41
bootyhole 41 points ago +42 / -1 (edited)

THEY GOT CAUGHT CHEATING SO THEY SCREWED THE WHOLE OPERATION. THE DESTRUCTION OF BALLOT ENVELOPES IS ALL THE PROOF WE NEED THAT FUCKERY IS AFOOT!!!

3
TheFountainhead 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly! This combined with the violation of alito’s order.... if it goes to the SCOTUS they will beg for mercy

3
sun_wolf 3 points ago +3 / -0

And what stops the CCP-DNC from just taking Amy Coney-Barrett’s kids hostage until she votes for the fraud?

I mean they probably don’t even have to do that. Just tell her unless she votes for the fraud, they will kill them all one by one in staged accidents over the next ten years. She is a chick, she will fold.

Then what?

I don’t even think this is at the point where there is a legal solution. Whether or not the American Republic falls comes down to Amy Coney Barrett? One woman?

Ticketmaster has already announced that concerts won’t be open to the public to anyone not vaccinated. Every other business will follow. Next will come the microchip inserted in our bodies to track us. Without it we won’t be able to buy or sell. Just having your vaccination card won’t be enough because people will sell and share them. They will force the microchip on everyone. One vote from Amy Coney Barrett is not going to be enough to stop this.

1
TheFountainhead 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe. Maybe not. I think that threatening a SCOTUS judge is not beyond these people, but I also think Trump probably has anticipated this.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
37
MAGA_Mania 37 points ago +37 / -0

Philadelphia and Allegheny are the scums of Pennsylvania.

28
Scottdelia 28 points ago +28 / -0

How do we get a good and fair audit when all the illegal votes are mixed with legal votes?

15
deleted 15 points ago +16 / -1
3
djmarcone 3 points ago +3 / -0

Re-vote?

2
Tookens 2 points ago +2 / -0

You don't.

1
sociopathix 1 point ago +1 / -0

The source of those ballots must be verified. A recount just recounts the ballots. An audit must prove they are legal.

27
Katarina_Reset 27 points ago +27 / -0

I mean, it's pretty obvious what has happened with the election.. what bothers me the most is that no one with any sort of power to stop this nonsense is not stopping and speaking up.. we need a complete overhaul of this country... It will take a big reset.

17
MAGA_Mania 17 points ago +17 / -0

Wait. It's coming.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
6
ProphetBoi 6 points ago +7 / -1

A... great... reset?

2
DeviousKid45 2 points ago +2 / -0

loads shotgun with malicious intent

2
Katarina_Reset 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yuuuup

26
MrRequiem 26 points ago +27 / -1

Aaaand it's gone. Lol.

26
EnterTheTrump 26 points ago +27 / -1

I think a lot of you are overlooking something here.

Yes, this screws with the whole recounting process. But also, this takes the blame away from Biden. Now when he loses Pennsylvania, it won't be because the Democrats cheated but rather because "some idiot" working the polls threw away the votes.

7
Joeret 7 points ago +7 / -0

Assuming the dems will allow him to lose PA. They are not going to give up easily.

24
_deleted_ 24 points ago +24 / -0

Like with a cloth?

7
MAGAngelo 7 points ago +7 / -0

No, with bleach, dummy!!

2
NoMoreLies 2 points ago +2 / -0

You have to inject it for it to work.

21
Granny 21 points ago +21 / -0

Ballots without envelopes must be invalidated!!!

9
WhitePowerRanger 9 points ago +9 / -0

A ballot without an envelope is inballotated

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
7
Oback_Barama 7 points ago +7 / -0

Ballots without envelopes are incomplete documents and therefore invalid.

They just invalided all the mail in ballots.

21
SpezDispenser 21 points ago +21 / -0

This makes PA a lock. They were ordered to separate thr ballots, but went ahead amd destroyed them? Sure Alito will love that.

17
SryServiceDown 17 points ago +17 / -0

Tweet unavailable.

7
Sonnet 7 points ago +7 / -0

anyone got an archive for our pedes?

11
3
Sonnet 3 points ago +3 / -0

<3

2
Dashmoomoo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Double thank you!

2
DrDT 2 points ago +2 / -0

Me too... Why?

17
NvJohansson 17 points ago +17 / -0

Looks like they destroyed the Tweet too. Can yall pls use screenshots... for so many reasons.

3
HeavyVetting 3 points ago +3 / -0

I hate when people post direct links to Twitter... embeds only work sometimes for me, and I often have to do weird things refreshing the link even after I click on it.

3
NvJohansson 3 points ago +3 / -0

Same, I'm banned from Twitter so I have to back and forth to see the tweet. I wish the admins would ask people to post screenshots of Twitter because half the time they get deleted and why give those assholes free hits?

17
Nezock_theKnight 17 points ago +17 / -0

Pennsylvania really screwed around with the Peoples' choice. Disobeyed the Supreme Court already. Next time the SCOTUS gets involved, the only logical, and fair, Remedy is to invalidate the Election.

States decide. It's time to go Constitutional.

8
Tellsyouhow 8 points ago +8 / -0

Surely it would be a unanimous decision if they already disobeyed a ruling from the supreme court.....or maybe some judges aren't really impartial

3
innawoods 3 points ago +3 / -0

If Pennsylvania doesn't want to stick to the principles it agreed to by ratifying the US Constitution, namely to have a "republican form of government", frankly I don't see why it should be allowed to be a state. Revert it to a Federal Territory until the government there can demonstrate basic competence in democratic principles.

15
2
OconusLurex 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you. This should be a stickied comment.

13
MegaMagaMan13 13 points ago +13 / -0

They just unlocked the thread...

Anyone got a screencap or archive of the tweet?

4
throatbiscuit 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'd love to see it as well. Wonder why it was locked?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
13
NotSoSilent 13 points ago +13 / -0

Anyone else disappointed in the lack of sophistication and technology used here?

Hope after Trump blows the fuckin doors down with his re-election he fixes this

3
johndude 3 points ago +4 / -1

Looks like they had the sophisticated technology covered already, but due to the unexpected magnitude of the landslide they had to improvise "a bit" on top of that

13
Szesan 13 points ago +13 / -0

This is basically admission of guilt! Why on God's green earth would you destroy the only way ballots can be validated? To cover up the fraud.

All of these ballots must be declared void, and those who destroyed the envelopes must be brought to criminal justice.

12
Droford 12 points ago +12 / -0
3
Julia_J 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you so much!

12
Agent_Bhaal 12 points ago +13 / -1

Not sure which rule of evidence this would be except that the destruction of evidence brings with it the automatic assumption that the evidence would not have been favorable to the side who had custody or destroyed it.

4
Maga2020Maga2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

You have to prove in court to a judge the the ones destroying it are the opposing 'side'.

They will claim they are simply workers who got confused.

2
johndude 2 points ago +3 / -1

In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice, though, there is.

11
UnauthorizedCaranx 11 points ago +11 / -0

Can we stop hot-linking to twitter? These tweets are being deleted by faciast twitter. Screenshots would be helpful

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
11
hereticpatriot 11 points ago +11 / -0

Already gone. Anybody get a screen shot?

9
Anyslogan2 9 points ago +9 / -0

If you can blatantly violate a Supreme Court Order without any ramifications, why am I paying my taxes? My utilities? and my mortgage? Laws apparently don’t matter.

9
PatrickHangry 9 points ago +10 / -1

Based on a preponderance of the evidence, blatantly destroying evidence of election fraud against a court order demonstrates that the election's result was untrustworthy. If an audit is no longer possible, there are only three remedies limited to PA:

a. Invalidate any remotely questionable ballots with prejudice, based on the preponderance of the evidence. In PA, that would mean everything that came in after they stopped counting.

b. Invalidate the election in PA, based on the preponderance of the evidence. Have another election.

c. Invalidate the election in PA, based on the preponderance of the evidence. Render a verdict in favor of the victim of cheating.

10
johndude 10 points ago +10 / -0

I think the point is not to make Biden win as much as it is to tarnish the inevitable Trump presidency from the start.

Even if Trump is able to stay in power (which is likely), 2020 will NEVER be remembered as the out-of-this-world Trump landslide that it should have been (and was). It will forever be remembered as something dirty, tarnished and the Nation as a whole will never be able to come together as agreeing which side really won.

Which makes Biden's points about "healing the Nation and re-uniting" especially spicy. This extra spiciness, of course, was intentional indeed. They have their own private jokes.

2
NvJohansson 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pretty much this, they fucked up and got caught now they're just trying to make it into the biggest klusterfuk Fiasco they can

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

d. Declare PA a rogue state, wall off Democrat areas as occupied territory, begin orbital bombardment.

8
aussie_maga 8 points ago +8 / -0 (edited)

Possible reasons why the Dems torched it:

a) Avoids further investigation and proof of fraud. This means the judge might be forced to either throw ALL the votes out or a re-vote. Both of which gives the Dems a better chance than the fraud being conclusively proven in court.

b) Avoids proof of fraud that can be used in other states. At worst, the Dems can argue that this only happened in Pennsylvania. Saves them other states and hides the methods of their fraud.

c) Saves the asses of the individual Dems who committed voter fraud. All those possible people implicated in voter fraud could turn and become witness, it is best to reduce the number of people that can be investigated.

d) Dems can also argue that the perpetrator of the ballot destruction is not necessarily a Democrat. It could be a Republican, and if it is, why should the people's votes not be counted just coz a Republican torched the ballots??

1
PierreDerelicto 1 point ago +1 / -0

Alito's order was only for PA because they were literally removed signature and date verification from the ballot and going around the state legislators to PA SC to RAM it through in violation of the federal constitution. There's 1 explanation.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
7
fuckRedditMAGA2020 7 points ago +7 / -0

"I can't believe the GOP would disenfranchise voters like this!"

Yeah, not the GOP's fault that the Dems invalidated ballots by committing a fucking crime

7
Space_Force 7 points ago +7 / -0

"This Tweet is unavailable."

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Space_Force 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks!

2
LibertyForAll 2 points ago +2 / -0

He deleted it so maybe it's not true?

7
Camperdon 7 points ago +7 / -0

Someone archived it. http://archive.today/blzvy

He said, "We are looking into this as we speak."

In response to:

@davidchapman141

"Philadelphia has destroyed all ballot envelopes.

This will make identifying naked ballots and ballots arriving post election impossible. It will also make finding fraud in an audit very hard."

7
Eurofag 7 points ago +8 / -1

lmao twatter be twatting

7
SNRNXS 7 points ago +7 / -0

Tweet deleted

1
mattssmith 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep, not there any more... did anyone capture it before it was deleted?

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
Hairy_Mouse 6 points ago +7 / -1

I simply CANNOT understand why people INSIST on linking to Tweets. Take a damn screenshot, THEN post THAT.

5
Crimson_Identity 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think both are useful. I wish people would post the screenshot, and then put the link as their first comment. That way we don't give traffic to twitter, but the few pedes who actually have accounts can find the tweets and spread them.

2
Hairy_Mouse 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean, it allows people to access the tweet, as well as cites the resource. However, you can look at the engagement statistics of particular tweets, and every time someone looks at a post with an embedded tweet, it adds the that tweets engagement numbers. PLUS, anything true and juicy is going to get deleted anyways, so the post becomes somewhat useless.

I agree that the screenshot should be posted, with a link to the actual tweet put somewhere. That way it proves the validity of the tweet, prevents the tweet from getting engagements, and preserves it from being deleted.

1
Pepbrandt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Both is good. Screenshots are easy to photoshop.

6
Mintap 6 points ago +6 / -0

So I'm guessing they destroyed the tweet about the destroyed envelopes?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
6
Sv215 6 points ago +6 / -0

What was the tweet? Shows up as deleted for me

4
Big-Dick-Dale 4 points ago +4 / -0

https://twitter.com/davidchapman141/status/1326593526868668417

Eric Trump said they are looking into this as we speak

-9
deleted -9 points ago +1 / -10