Because they’d rather take the chances that votes are kept and they’re given some meaningless slap on the wrist. If they had kept the envelopes illegal votes would have been easy to prove. Now it’s up to the court to invalidate all the mail in ballots that don’t have an envelope to verify signatures, which they could do.
But the Dems know the odds of the Supreme Court siding with allowing the votes to stand is still greater than the risk of keeping envelopes of fraudulent votes. It’s literally a, “yeah, I didn’t follow the law but where’s your proof of fraud?” move. Desperation play but probably logically the only choice they had.
If the court rules against them they can gaslight the left through the media even more about DiSeNfRaNcHiSeD vOtErS. Which will either lead to 4 more years of bullshit investigations on how “Trump stole the election” or mass upheaval in the streets that will make the earlier riots look like friendly bonfires.
Why would you give Trump's lawyers more evidence of systematic voter fraud
Because they’d rather take the chances that votes are kept and they’re given some meaningless slap on the wrist. If they had kept the envelopes illegal votes would have been easy to prove. Now it’s up to the court to invalidate all the mail in ballots that don’t have an envelope to verify signatures, which they could do.
But the Dems know the odds of the Supreme Court siding with allowing the votes to stand is still greater than the risk of keeping envelopes of fraudulent votes. It’s literally a, “yeah, I didn’t follow the law but where’s your proof of fraud?” move. Desperation play but probably logically the only choice they had.
If the court rules against them they can gaslight the left through the media even more about DiSeNfRaNcHiSeD vOtErS. Which will either lead to 4 more years of bullshit investigations on how “Trump stole the election” or mass upheaval in the streets that will make the earlier riots look like friendly bonfires.