Can we think of a legitimate reason to include this feature? Why would they document it if it's only use is fraud? There must be some other reason, even if it's just an alibi. Can someone help me play devil's advocate?
That's not what the three-fifths compromise was retard
The best possible case for black slaves in that era was being counted as zero % of a person. They didn't actually get to use any of that "representation", it was simply for census purposes so southerners could get more seated representatives (slaves were not going around voting on memorandums), a bigger chunk of the federal-level pie, based on trying to count slaves as part of the state population. Northerners wanted them to have no representation aka population addition, southerners wanted them to have 100% representation aka population addition. Either way, there was no scenario where african slaves were going around voting on shit due to this bill, it was representation in the sense of a Republic. Personally I don't think slaves should have any voter representation, it doesn't make any fucking sense, but the state should not allow slavery in the first place so there you go.
t. pissed off because i seem to be the only person that didn't misinterpret this in grade school
I've been watching a few of Dr. Shivas videos for a while now. In one of his videos I watched about a month ago he was explaining that the machines at their core were developed for housing associations. They programmed in weighted votes because a homeowner with a 2000sqft house would have a larger say than a neighbor with only 1500sqft.
Maybe the "Super" delegates in Democrat Convention, their votes count more than others. That's how Hillary stole the nomination from that communist guy, can't rem-- Bernie Sanders.
I can't think of anywhere in our country's political process where such a feature would be needed, but these machines are used in other countries as well...
while i agree with you somewhat, these sorts of instructions and memos are not for you, the voter. they are for the technicians and higher-ups deciding on what software to put in their ballot machines.
Can we think of a legitimate reason to include this feature? Why would they document it if it's only use is fraud? There must be some other reason, even if it's just an alibi. Can someone help me play devil's advocate?
That's not what the three-fifths compromise was retard
The best possible case for black slaves in that era was being counted as zero % of a person. They didn't actually get to use any of that "representation", it was simply for census purposes so southerners could get more seated representatives (slaves were not going around voting on memorandums), a bigger chunk of the federal-level pie, based on trying to count slaves as part of the state population. Northerners wanted them to have no representation aka population addition, southerners wanted them to have 100% representation aka population addition. Either way, there was no scenario where african slaves were going around voting on shit due to this bill, it was representation in the sense of a Republic. Personally I don't think slaves should have any voter representation, it doesn't make any fucking sense, but the state should not allow slavery in the first place so there you go.
t. pissed off because i seem to be the only person that didn't misinterpret this in grade school
3/5 would be 0.6, but this is a good point regardless.
I've been watching a few of Dr. Shivas videos for a while now. In one of his videos I watched about a month ago he was explaining that the machines at their core were developed for housing associations. They programmed in weighted votes because a homeowner with a 2000sqft house would have a larger say than a neighbor with only 1500sqft.
Maybe the "Super" delegates in Democrat Convention, their votes count more than others. That's how Hillary stole the nomination from that communist guy, can't rem-- Bernie Sanders.
Pretty sure this is the answer...?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weighted_voting
I can't think of anywhere in our country's political process where such a feature would be needed, but these machines are used in other countries as well...
You know, I bet they were going to use it to cheat, then, once they shoved “equity” down our throats, they’d just be open about it.
This "inventor of Email" thing really doesn't serve him imo
Generally accepted that Ray Tomlinson invented e-mail. Iirc, the story is Shiva copyrighted the term "Email".
https://fossbytes.com/who-invented-email-ray-tomlinson-or-shiva-ayyadurai-know-the-truth/
So does this mean the 3/5 Compromise applies to us now?
Why in fuck would it ever be weighted? A false scale is an abomination.
while i agree with you somewhat, these sorts of instructions and memos are not for you, the voter. they are for the technicians and higher-ups deciding on what software to put in their ballot machines.