We can't accept a recount, even a hand recount. Don't fall for it. We need an audit where only votes deemed legitimate count. As honest pollster Rich Baris pointed out, "Recounts largely just re-feed the same ballots through the same tabulators." That will just legitimize the steal.
(twitter.com)
🛑 STOP THE STEAL 🛑
Comments (65)
sorted by:
If a simple recount is the first step on the way to full audits, it could be enough to eliminate the false votes tallied up by way of the dem's go-to move of simply having loyal poll workers run a batch of ballots through 50 times. They got caught doing that in Detroit in 2016, and that was one of many similar instances that led to the recount being called off.
If we allow a recount without an audit we will lose for the reason Rich Baris noted. No recount without a simultaneous audit should be accepted.
All I meant was it could be done quickly, if just weeding out the switched votes, dumped votes and piles counted multiple times tips it to POTUS, then there's no need to proceed further, and no worries about it being indisputably legit, or what the SCOTUS might do. If that doesn't win it, then an audit. Or certify the result with POTUS as winner, have all machines and ballots seized and held for investigations, and on inauguration day we celebrate with post ceremony public hangings.
Audit THEN recount.
And recount before hand will simply be counting the fraud as valid (it will catch the machines flipping votes).