1366
posted ago by SonomaGA +1366 / -0

All other governmental and safety critical software companies such as aircraft microcontrollers are subject to audit.

Imagine if “software glitches” happened in bank code. Why is software used in an election less scrutinized?

DO IT NOW.

All other governmental and safety critical software companies such as aircraft microcontrollers are subject to audit. Imagine if “software glitches” happened in bank code. Why is software used in an election less scrutinized? DO IT NOW.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
19
Libertygirl1776 19 points ago +19 / -0

Right? How fucking difficult can that be?

3
QuantumReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

And should literally be the simplest fucking software. When vote goes in add 1 to a or add 1 to b. That's it. Rinse and repeat. How the fuck do u "glitch" that.

2
4more 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even better make it open source. Anyone should be able to audit it.

8
Sniper77 8 points ago +8 / -0

Did they bring in the "feature" on a flash drive?

7
undef 7 points ago +7 / -0

Finding the cheating in the code could take days or weeks and a team of developers meticulously reverse engineering the entire system...

Or you put the developers that wrote the voting software in a room with one angry vet armed with pliers, a box cutter, and a loofah. Close the door and turn off the cameras. Five minutes later you'll have a powerpoint walkthrough of exactly how the software cheats.

4
SithBot 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sounds fair

3
TrumpTrainChoooChoo2 3 points ago +3 / -0

More than fair.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
undef 4 points ago +4 / -0

They picked the loofah.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
nc777 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes same with medical devices.
audit all design inputs, outputs, specifications, test records, etc.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
WaMAGAForever 1 point ago +1 / -0

If they’ve replaced the code, then a simple recount should yield a different result though, right? So we have to fight for either 1) an audit of the code or 2) a recount with the code unchanged. Either way it should end up with Trump winning

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
5
blacktankguy 5 points ago +5 / -0

It’s possible the bits got flipped while traveling along the internet.

4
mintscape 4 points ago +4 / -0

I was part of the voting machine outcry 15 years ago, Bev Harris was really chasing after it with her non-profit called Black Box Voting. Everything is so slippery with the machines and the vendors, hard to get any answers let alone source code.

It is so much worse than most Pedes know. Maybe it will go different with Trump, I hope so but they have been doing this fraud for years.

You should read this from 2018

The patterns are the same, the tricks are the same. Deny, obfuscate, lie and then destroy evidence.

I am not as hopeful as many here with the voting machine issues simply because I have seen all this in the past and it has gotten worse and not better.

Getting close to 2A time if there is any hope of keeping the Republic. Sorry, but things are way more fucked up than most of you know.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
Russianbot626 4 points ago +4 / -0

All software our government produces should be open source. We paid for it after all. Second it will allow the citizens to verify the code. Make all government code open source.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
SonomaGA [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Remember “muh toyota throttle controller software” and Boeing 737 MAX software “glitches”?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Kekbewithus 3 points ago +4 / -1

Raid Dominion immediately and seize everything. Arrest every single programmer and take them all to court.

Someone will flip and you have the hardware and software.

2
legalgirl 2 points ago +2 / -0

yea whats the problem, this should already been done, maybe it has?

2
JustInTime2_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Audit the machines.

2
Crisis83 2 points ago +2 / -0

What ever was done is not in the code anymore bro. The only thing we could possibly do is data analysis and hand recounts, or new elections where results seem very implausible.

2
chuckachookah 2 points ago +2 / -0

You don’t understand. The code they provide to be audited won’t be the same code used these key districts.

That’s why this is going to be very hard to prove.

Those machines were in those specific areas so they could do exactly what they did and what they are doing. And if we question it, they will cry racism.

1
butte_weippe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not just the machines, they also need to audit the systems they interface with and the version control history if the softwares.

1
zeporscheguy 1 point ago +1 / -0

They pushed software updates the night before the election. Gee, I wonder why. These machines were connected to the network. That should immediately invalidate them.

1
ObeyJuanShinobi 1 point ago +1 / -0

Calling it!

If the machines are audited, Dirty Democrats left russian fingerprints all over the machines!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
stonetears4fears 1 point ago +1 / -0

Source 👏 code 👏

1
Durdurdurkistan 1 point ago +1 / -0

You’re assuming that the software doesn’t have features which allow temporary alterations.

All they had to do was manipulate the machines Dor a couple of hours with variable inputs that aren’t saved. Then change them back once votes were switched.

These machines connect to the internet for a reason

1
PitStains 1 point ago +1 / -0

I read they were running from code on a flash drive. If those flash drives are trashed there will be no evidence. Just hope they will be able to dig up a flash drive still intact.

1
cook_does 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, confiscate rand machines, offline them, decompile and make the code dump open source so the hacker named 4chan can get some Cheeto grease on it,

1
antimatter 1 point ago +2 / -1

Gambling machines go through STRICT code review and change controls monitored and approved by government. Do we really have no such controls on Voting machine code? If so, that is waaaay insane.