She supplied the debate questions to a presidential
candidate. Then lied, then admitted. My point is,as always, the average citizen of the USA is held to a different standard.
i say again: she doesn't belong on any major news network as a paid contributor, but no one would go to jail for this. in fact, i'm glad she did it. showed how weak they were while pretending there was no possible way trump could win
I would think she should have been charged with a conspiracy to alter the outcome of a presidential election.
If an average citizen had acquired the questions ,by deceit or not, I think that citizen would enjoy a visit from the fed for election interference. But, who knows?
She supplied the debate questions to a presidential candidate. Then lied, then admitted. My point is,as always, the average citizen of the USA is held to a different standard.
the question, again, is: is that criminal?
i say again: she doesn't belong on any major news network as a paid contributor, but no one would go to jail for this. in fact, i'm glad she did it. showed how weak they were while pretending there was no possible way trump could win
I would think she should have been charged with a conspiracy to alter the outcome of a presidential election. If an average citizen had acquired the questions ,by deceit or not, I think that citizen would enjoy a visit from the fed for election interference. But, who knows?