Let's discuss our observations from the lawsuits. List the State, Plaintiff, Defendant, page number, and paragraph.
Then, post your observation or concisely reasoned theory.
Michigan, Costantino/McCall v. City of Detroit, et. al.
Page 4 of 77, Number 3, Letter A
Quote:
"Defendants systematically used false information to process ballots, such as using incorrect or false birthdays. Many times, the election workers inserted new names
into the QVF after the election and recorded these new voters as having a birthdate
of 1/1/1900."
Theory:
The year 1900 was a mistake. It was supposed to be the year 2000 but the responsible person(s) made the wrong input at some point along the line. The birth year of 2000 would mean 2020 is their first Presidential Election, as they turned 18 between this election and the last. The Democrats were going to use these votes as proof that they had a huge turn out among new young voters. This would account for both the record turnout number, and the massive increase for Democrats.
Let's discuss our observations from the lawsuits. List the State, Plaintiff, Defendant, page number, and paragraph.
Then, post your observation or concisely reasoned theory.
Michigan, Costantino/McCall v. City of Detroit, et. al.
Page 4 of 77, Number 3, Letter A
Quote:
"Defendants systematically used false information to process ballots, such as using incorrect or false birthdays. Many times, the election workers inserted new names
into the QVF after the election and recorded these new voters as having a birthdate
of 1/1/1900."
Theory:
The year 1900 was a mistake. It was supposed to be the year 2000 but the responsible person(s) made the wrong input at some point along the line. The birth year of 2000 would mean 2020 is their first Presidential Election, as they turned 18 between this election and the last. The Democrats were going to use these votes as proof that they had a huge turn out among new young voters. This would account for both the record turnout number, and the massive increase for Democrats.
Key word game? Systematically. Unfortunately during the hearing it seems as if the judge was leaning more toward the believability of the CoD's affidavits. Just a casual observation. Hopefully there is more evidence outside of the affidavits. A word such as "systematically" suggests there is.
Certainly they'll get copies of the ballots. I agree---they need actual proof and it needs to be widespread, as you said.