429
Comments (52)
sorted by:
21
BanMySteakKnives 21 points ago +21 / -0

I'll believe it when I see it.

12
highenergywinning 12 points ago +13 / -1

This lawyer represented nick sandman. He won by the way. A lot of money . Like half a billion.......

7
Plaquenil 7 points ago +8 / -1

Settlement wasn't disclosed.

6
highenergywinning 6 points ago +7 / -1

Hes settled 2 so far

5
Plaquenil 5 points ago +5 / -0

I meant the amount wasn't disclosed.

5
highenergywinning 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes i know.

5
haolecoder 5 points ago +6 / -1

Being a good lawyer doesn’t make him a good statistical analyst capable of making this major of a claim if it’s only based on that article. Unless he has some inside information he should refrain from making posts like this.

2
FreedomSteak 2 points ago +2 / -0

Technically correct, the best kind of correct 🤣

1
highenergywinning 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol

2
JerryJerryJerry 2 points ago +2 / -0

IANaL, but is a settlement a win? And sauce on that number?

2
UpTrump 2 points ago +3 / -1

There was some great evidence in reply to the post yesterday explaining why the analysis was wrong. I'm not sure what to believe

10
JoinTheDiscussion 10 points ago +10 / -0

Good! Some need to hang to set a president

4
DoIMAGAYouHornyBaby 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not only that, but the ENTIRE Democrat party needs to be held accountable in one way, shape, or form. From RussiaX3, Shampeachment, CovidPlandemic and killing nursing home residents, and now election fraud? Something needs to give or justice has not been served. I’ll take some hangings as a start, but i also want some barred from public office.

3
williammcfadden 3 points ago +3 / -0

The “news” media is to blame for protecting these monsters for 60 years.

2
JoinTheDiscussion 2 points ago +2 / -0

Preaching to the choir here

5
DuesImperator 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well, how soon is soon? Because it needs to happen NOW! Also, alt-right Heavy had some interesting info to share about Dominion Voting too.... https://heavy.com/news/dominion-voting-systems-glitch-clinton-pelosi-michigan-georgia/

5
holliday50 5 points ago +9 / -4

Reading between the lines, this is horrible news. Hear me out. Lin Wood has been dropping cryptic hints, and now this one, strongly labeled as "the evidence is irrefutable" and "people will go to prison". This article he's linking here is referencing the analysis done here @ thedonald.win. He does not have any more evidence than what our pede created. The problem is that analysis had issues. We had fellow pedes trying to get the word out that it was flawed, but the cat is out of the bag.

Making matters worse, the same analysis was the source for Sidney Powell's recent tweets.

I just pray they have a hell of a lot more to back this up, and I pray that same analysis wasn't responsible for POTUS "we caught them" tweet.

5
ClarenceBeeks 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm thinking he has information from Dominion whistleblowers of intelligence agencies.

4
holliday50 4 points ago +5 / -1

I hope so. Because if I'm on here looking for Intel from Trump's lawyers, and they're on here looking for Intel from us, that's not a good look. Not that we don't have good Intel, but it sounds like that analysis had legit concerns. Hope the whistleblowers deliver.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
DevPede 1 point ago +1 / -0

He said "More TRUTH", emphasis on more. Whether or not the article itself is correct, I don't think this is even close to all they have. It's more of a headline he saw that matches what they already know. Keep your head up Pede!

1
TrumpTrainNov3 1 point ago +2 / -1

What exactly is flawed about it? Sorry I haven't been following it closely enough

4
ClarenceBeeks 4 points ago +4 / -0

Last I saw it was showing both Biden and Trump getting votes but more going to Biden. The current effort is to match the vote changes to network coverage videos.

If nothing else it's a good indication that the reporting systems themselves are wonky.

It's not conclusive or irrefutable which makes the above tweet a bit suspect. This makes you wonder about other tweets. Also certainly possible that he's connecting this to other things he knows.

2
holliday50 2 points ago +2 / -0

Buddy, you're going to need pedes much smarter than I am. I'm only repeating the concerns that I've read on the various threads that discuss it. If you open this article, though, and read through the comments, it looks like those concerns are voiced there too.

1
UpTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

From the article's comments

As a data scientist, I unfortunately have to agree. The code is simply looking to see if Trump lost votes (good idea), but then if Biden gained any during the time frame, it's assuming all of the votes are switched to him.

For a first pass, finding the fact that vote totals went down is not too bad, but the assumption that all of them got switched to Biden if his vote total went up at all doesn't necessarily always work.

0
deleted 0 points ago +4 / -4
5
ChuckedBeef 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well I guess we have to take your word for it /s

5
BrakeRemovalMechanic 5 points ago +5 / -0

I checked out your argument and I don't think it holds water. Especially the basis that "Republican areas don't have a higher concentration of Republican leaning independents" This is simply not true. Republican areas do have a higher area of republican leaning non affiliated voters.

2
Filetsmignon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for looking it over. I appreciate the feedback.

4
holliday50 4 points ago +5 / -1

Damn, what's wrong with Shiva's analysis? I thought that was solid.

4
haolecoder 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not being sarcastic here, you should present your argument to Shiva, I’d like to hear his response.

4
ClarenceBeeks 4 points ago +4 / -0

Shiva's case looks strong to me

2
FromSethWithLove 2 points ago +2 / -0

Media, courts, etc: "Nuh-uuuh"

2
fapoo 2 points ago +2 / -0

hold the line guys, it's going to be a long fight.

2
Loiuzein 2 points ago +2 / -0

With Hilldawg?

2
12gauge 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can we just skip Christmas this year and go straight to the indictments?

1
JerryJerryJerry 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please, Lin. I mean, I like you, but I've been hurt before...

0
Shotzor 0 points ago +1 / -1

This is a big bluff to get people to flip. Sure I hope there is evidence, but broadcasting it like this seems more likely the latter.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +3 / -5
2
traveravis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Reality Winner

2
MississippiPede 2 points ago +2 / -0

My brother’s baby mama went to jail for DUI in July.

Be more specific with your requests homie

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
2
MississippiPede 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m just fuckin with you. You asked a question and I answered it.

Chill out bud.

Idk about “nobody is going to get in trouble for anything”. Maybe they won’t, I don’t know.

But didn’t trump just do this a few weeks ago?

https://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/522151-trump-signs-legislation-into-law-making-hacking-voting-systems-a-federal

2
WorstVikingEver 2 points ago +3 / -1

shut the fuck up you gutless cuck

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1