Trump's Missing Votes: -31065
Biden's Unexplained Votes: 30291
I found irregularities in the Edison Data (which was big news yesterday) but the poster didn't narrow it down properly.
Here is my analysis which corrects for margins of error (given 3 decimal rounding on ratios) and checks BOTH WAYS to see if votes went to Trump or Biden.
It checks to see if the ratios changed more than the vote counts would allow for MATHMATICALLY. And oh boy do they ever.
PA is showing this:
Trump's Missing Votes: -31065
Biden's Unexplained Votes: 30291
PROOF IS HERE:
https://archive.is/lcyqw
There is a chance that the anomalies we found are legitimate. There's a chance that the anomalies are a fix to an error they found.
The problem is, if the anomalies are a fixed to an error they found, the error has to be gradual, something that they trickled in. The question becomes if an error trickled in, how did it trickle in, and how did they discover that the error trickled in?
If the error is not a fix, but instead a transcription error, then the question is raised where is the reciprocal fix? We should see a fix down the line resolving the error, presumably equal to the error. If there is an argument that the error has been fixed, but the fix has been mixed with future reports so it fits within the margin that works statistically, then you have a solid and unambiguous case of fraud.
Since there is no obvious Spike that they are solving with this Mass swing for Biden, the only option if we are to assume it is legitimate is that the error they are correcting took a long time to accumulate and they were able to detect the long-term error and resolve it during counting, rather than after the fact.
If they cannot point to an error that was being fixed, then a real Stark realization takes place. The anomalies that I discovered are reflected in the final totals that New York times is using right now. Somebody needs to answer for them, but I have just ruled out any legitimate excuse for them whatsoever.
Read more about the analysis here: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8Skkr1s/corrected-analisys-of-edison-dat/c/
Pretty interesting stuff. Hope this gets shown at some point.
Caution about Edison's compiled "data" from u/MAGAt :
This is not official voting data. No news organization has official voting data directly. They all get it indirectly reported from individual counties.
Official voting data is released/updated as votes are tabulated by county election officials/county websites. Each county has its own, individual election website where it release data. So for every single county there is a data feed for vote tabulation.
What CNN has to do is take every single file across the entire US and tabulate them. Some counties have certain formats. Some counties share formats. Some counties do not share formats. And all counties update at different times. Each county's voter data comes as what we call a data feed.
Each data feed like I said can be different:
Here is Clark County, NV's data feed: https://www.nvsos.gov/SOSelectionPages/results/2020StateWideGeneral/Clark.aspx
Here is Maricopa County's data feed: https://recorder.maricopa.gov/electionarchives/2016/03-08-2016%20Final%20Precinct%20Report.txt
One county provides files in PDF and TXT formats. One is just a generic webpage. Each individual county's results is an individual data feed. Typically the best way to handle crap like this is to write an individual program for each data feed in python and parse it individually. You'd use something like python+beautiful soup or one of the many other data parsing python libraries.
Now, large enough media companies who report elections will have huge data science teams dedicated to getting up to the MILLISECOND data. They will hire lots of programmers to write a program to read a single data feed. Since each format is different. this means writing 3,141 different data feeds. Each program is called a feed handler.
Feed handlers can sometimes bug out. If you load a data feed and there is an error during transfer, sometimes it can scramble your data. Or sometimes you hit a node that has updated results, but then you refresh and the results go back to a previous version. This can be caused by a lot of things.
But to sum up a huge complicated system my point is basically this. If you guys are recording TV feeds or website screenshots from CNN, in no way shape or form is any of that even remotely official. The sheer amount of data feeds that get updated constantly all night long along with the many, MANY problems that can come from parsing said data can all easily explain all of the "irregularities" you guys are seeing.
Absolutely fucking ZERO of this will hold up in court. Look I fucking hate Biden and I want Trump to be president for the rest of his life. But I am telling you guys, I PROMISE YOU, you are pinning all your hopes for overturning this election on something that just isn't true.
I really am sorry. I don't want to be the messenger. Do you think I want this? I don't. But I spent 4 years working on data feed systems at a website that did online real estate listings. We had thousands and thousands of data feeds. They are a CONSTANT headache and things always go wrong with parsing the data.