I actually don't see the censorship anymore, not even the notes. It might be selective, they might know if you're pro-Trump or not, and only shield it for the normies.
Really upsets me that they do this at all. Why is it their responsibility if they’re just a platform and why are they not regulated if they’re going to editorialize?
More importantly, what authority are they relying upon to back their assertions against the President of the United States of America. Only valid answers are SCOTUS and the entirety of Congress -- not Pelosi alone.
Come on, everyone knows Twitter is the authority for knowledge on presidential elections, they know more about it than the president who's done two of them!
Exactly, and you can't just use any phone number either, no VOIP/Net based numbers allowed. You can't remove the number either, it requires a new linked number, so only option after that is full account closure.
there's plenty of reason to hate on Twitter, but just remember that POTUS is continuing to use it FOR A REASON. He is going to blaze those m'Fers on the other side of #J20
Screenshot are less valuable than the source links, because they can be faked or edited deceptively. And thats where parler fails even worse than the shitpile that twitter has become, since you cant even link to a post. Nor can the archive.orgs of the site be generated and linked either.
A site with no reliable way to reference it may as well not exist, it cant play any part in open debate because its just not open.
Problem is that Parler doesn't allow people not on it's site to see posts.
I never can. Then agan, I use no script and ghostery and don't allow anything except top domain access.
Only through direct links, you can't browse. And needs a phone nr to sign up. Kinda annoying but I signed up anyway to Parler and Gab to support them.
Gab
Twitter has it use for now. Just like reddit had its use back in the day.
GEOTUS just needs to dump twitter.
It would be awesome if he sent messages first on Parler then posted the Parler screenshot as a tweet 30 minutes later.
Seriously. Gab gets lots of shit for having a bad user base but it’s a damn good platform with great UI.
Whats Twitter? Never heard of it.
He should post exclusively on the Donald.win the best social media site in the world
I actually don't see the censorship anymore, not even the notes. It might be selective, they might know if you're pro-Trump or not, and only shield it for the normies.
Really upsets me that they do this at all. Why is it their responsibility if they’re just a platform and why are they not regulated if they’re going to editorialize?
More importantly, what authority are they relying upon to back their assertions against the President of the United States of America. Only valid answers are SCOTUS and the entirety of Congress -- not Pelosi alone.
Come on, everyone knows Twitter is the authority for knowledge on presidential elections, they know more about it than the president who's done two of them!
Gab is better than Parler
Change my mind.
Exactly, and you can't just use any phone number either, no VOIP/Net based numbers allowed. You can't remove the number either, it requires a new linked number, so only option after that is full account closure.
gab.com
That was a true bug, btw. They fixed it immediately and cleared it up.
Twitter is so fucked.
This.
Screenshot image post.
Link and archive in comments.
Still don't like having to show ID for an account.
Can you recommend some retweet accounts?
Here’s one for the president - https://parler.com/profile/PresidentDonaldTrump/posts
Thanks!
there's plenty of reason to hate on Twitter, but just remember that POTUS is continuing to use it FOR A REASON. He is going to blaze those m'Fers on the other side of #J20
Screenshot are less valuable than the source links, because they can be faked or edited deceptively. And thats where parler fails even worse than the shitpile that twitter has become, since you cant even link to a post. Nor can the archive.orgs of the site be generated and linked either.
A site with no reliable way to reference it may as well not exist, it cant play any part in open debate because its just not open.