In Florida the winner of 13 of the last 14 presidential elections has gone on to win the White House. Trump won there in 2016 by 1.2%, in this election he won by 3.3%.
In Ohio, every presidential candidate that has won the state has gone on to secure the White House. The last time this didn't happen was with John F. Kennedy in 1960.
Can anyone calculate the statistical chance of a presidential candidate winning both Florida and Ohio but not going on to become President? I'm guessing the chance of both these things occurring would statistically be very low.
A lot of the older normies understand the significance of the Bellwether States (whose results tend to reflect the voting behavior of the entire country). Perhaps using this election's improbable results in these states would be the easiest way to demonstrate to people in a common sense kind of way that these election results are very fishy.
You should look at the bell weather county chart
Trump also won 9 of the top 10 bellwether counties and he won them BIGLY.
This alone points to massive fraud and stolen votes in other states.
Yes, they are using data from these states and counties as comparisons to establish statistical trends, helping to establish anomalies and potential fraud in “battleground” states and counties.
There are bellwether counties also. To make the bellwether statistics argument more effective, you need more bellwethers.
Check bellwether counties. All but 3 I think voted for Trump with about 10% win. Valencia county in NM is one of these. Voted for a winning president 17 times now and this yeas surprise surprise it voted for president Trump to win and he surpringly didn't.
stat(ohio + florida) = 2 * residential + abesentee) - dem corrupt / # of nerds) = quantatative absolute absurdity = votes for Trump.