I wish some lawyer Pedes would start a mega AMA thread on TD so that us regular Pedes could understand the entire system from beginning to end.
Like I know they are filing these legal testimonies, but I have no idea what it means, what happens next, and what the next steps are.
Like has a judge been assigned to this case already?
Can we present new evidence?
Etc etc.
Lawyer pede here (Created an account and went from reader to contributor because of this comment here).
This situation is a bit of a mess because it is multijuridictional. There are filings in different states under different state laws, using different legal arguments. BUT, generally speaking the idea here is to convince a judge that a wrong has been committed (against the voters) and to ask for 'relief.' The wrong(s) need to be sufficient that they actually affected the election (most Judges will say 'I'm not going to create a huge mess for a handful of stolen votes), then the relief needs to be 'appropriate'. Relief could be (depending on the evidence presented, and the state laws): Recount, Vote Audit, Disqualify certain ballots, Election re-do (there is some precedent for this in smaller elections) or ... Beyond the court-system, We could ask the legislature (in PA for example) to not certify the results (due to fraud), or even to appoint electors for trump.
Each battle is different with different judges. I've reviewed the pleadings for MI and PA, but I do not know what is happening in the other states legally speaking yet.
There are two campaigns happening simultaneously, the legal campaign, and the public opinion campaign, they are actually both critical. I could opine further (or even do an AMA) if people are interested.
I wish some lawyer Pedes would start a mega AMA thread on TD so that us regular Pedes could understand the entire system from beginning to end.
Like I know they are filing these legal testimonies, but I have no idea what it means, what happens next, and what the next steps are. Like has a judge been assigned to this case already? Can we present new evidence? Etc etc.
Lawyer pede here (Created an account and went from reader to contributor because of this comment here).
This situation is a bit of a mess because it is multijuridictional. There are filings in different states under different state laws, using different legal arguments. BUT, generally speaking the idea here is to convince a judge that a wrong has been committed (against the voters) and to ask for 'relief.' The wrong(s) need to be sufficient that they actually affected the election (most Judges will say 'I'm not going to create a huge mess for a handful of stolen votes), then the relief needs to be 'appropriate'. Relief could be (depending on the evidence presented, and the state laws): Recount, Vote Audit, Disqualify certain ballots, Election re-do (there is some precedent for this in smaller elections) or ... Beyond the court-system, We could ask the legislature (in PA for example) to not certify the results (due to fraud), or even to appoint electors for trump.
Each battle is different with different judges. I've reviewed the pleadings for MI and PA, but I do not know what is happening in the other states legally speaking yet.
There are two campaigns happening simultaneously, the legal campaign, and the public opinion campaign, they are actually both critical. I could opine further (or even do an AMA) if people are interested.
For the Republic!
Dang! Ask and you shall receive. Thank you for the thoughtful answers.
Great comment fellow pede!. Yes, definitely interested in a AMA.
Legal AMA: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XRPp2Z/legalpede-101-amalawyer-pede/
Legal AMA: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XRPp2Z/legalpede-101-amalawyer-pede/