The earlier whistle blower exposed fraud but his evidence is whats known as "hearsay". He didnt actually commit any fraud, he didnt see fraud either. He only heard someone talking about committing fraud. They may or may not have committed fraud, and its next to impossible to know what the actual fraud is i.e. which ballots they tampered
We need someone with actionable evidence to come forward. Someone who was directly instructed to tamper ballots by their senior. Or someone who directly witnessed fraud.
The first whistleblower's entire testimony doesnt lead to the discovery of any commission of any crime/election fraud. It contains only discussions of potential crime. No one knows which ballots were back dated, when they were delivered etc. No judge is going to rule on that, let alone a liberal judge the kind that are staffed across PA district courts.
A whistleblower who says "My senior told me to backdate this ballot, I did it on his asking, the batch was delivered to XXXX at time YYY" - open and shut case. Clear actionable evidence. Biden BTFO
We’re not relying solely on these affidavits, hand auditing and then looking at the dominion machines will prove it. The affidavits are necessary only to prove there definitely needs to be an investigation.
The earlier whistle blower exposed fraud but his evidence is whats known as "hearsay". He didnt actually commit any fraud, he didnt see fraud either. He only heard someone talking about committing fraud. They may or may not have committed fraud, and its next to impossible to know what the actual fraud is i.e. which ballots they tampered
We need someone with actionable evidence to come forward. Someone who was directly instructed to tamper ballots by their senior. Or someone who directly witnessed fraud.
Affidavits can be what’s known as admissible hearsay.
The first whistleblower's entire testimony doesnt lead to the discovery of any commission of any crime/election fraud. It contains only discussions of potential crime. No one knows which ballots were back dated, when they were delivered etc. No judge is going to rule on that, let alone a liberal judge the kind that are staffed across PA district courts.
A whistleblower who says "My senior told me to backdate this ballot, I did it on his asking, the batch was delivered to XXXX at time YYY" - open and shut case. Clear actionable evidence. Biden BTFO
We’re not relying solely on these affidavits, hand auditing and then looking at the dominion machines will prove it. The affidavits are necessary only to prove there definitely needs to be an investigation.