Legalpede 101 AMA:
lawyer pede here. AMA re legal process questions for the legal fights going on, I'll do my best to answer.
Situation so far: GEOTUS is besieged by hostile forces in his administration and around the republic. (Check out the manpower reshuffle going on right now)
There are two battles, a Legal battle, and a Public Opinion battle. The traitors have the entire MSM and so the public opinion battle is as hardly fought as any other. It is important for this reason that 'relatable' bits of evidence get into the national conscienceness (specific dead people voting, specific voters who had their vote stolen by someone else, specific people who got multiple ballots, specific instances of witnessed fraud, criminality, and other malfeasance.
In the legal battle there are many battlefronts, each state has its own laws, and requires locally licensed attorneys to make appearances on behalf of the campaign. I've seen pleadings filed in PA and MI. MI pleadings alleged pages of widespread fraud. In states where fraud is established, a Judge may grant relief.
Relief requested must become, at a minimum, a Vote 'Audit', a recount without an audit is essentially useless (otherwise same fraudulent ballots go into same machines). Other relief could be an election do-over in a particular state (this has been done in other kinds of elections with even a small amount of fraud proved). GEOTUS legalbeagles appear to be going for Recount in GA and WI. Lawsuits pending in PA
GA: Recount/Audit WI: Recount/(Audit?) PA: Lawsuit (Relief requested: disqualify hundreds of thousands of ballots). Ballots arriving too late supposed to be segregated. NV: Investigating out of state voters, and other fraud (looking at you californians) AZ: Unknown (Sharpiegate not gaining much traction legally as far as I know) MI: Suit alleging massive levels of fraud launched. Pleadings are extensive, and if even half of it is true, it is worth becoming top MSM story regardless of whether it makes a difference in who wins.
AMA (& I'll do my best to answer). Other legalpedes welcome to opine.
For the Republic!
How will the destruction of mail-in-ballot envelopes in PA complicate the GOP legal proceedings? I assumed these were needed to verify the allegations of naked ballots and mail-in-ballot back-dating.
Patriots may argue that we can't verify the ballots and they should be discarded, leftists will argue that is an extreme remedy. Normally a failure by the wrongdoer to secure evidence like this would be construed against the wrongdoer. A Judge could decide that any questionable ballots that can't be fully verified can be tossed. You can't destroy evidence, in a way you're specifically not allowed to do, and then cry when the result is you've invalidated the votes.
If the date of arrival is unknown they will try some other way to show which ballots are which (should be chain of custody for votes), if the chain is so broken and confused, this should cut against leftists not against Patriots. It is there responsibility to follow all these rules, their failure to do so should only hurt their arguments, it is not the responsibility of the voter to prove an unsecured vote is not legit, its their responsibility to prove it IS (by following the procedures that establish the rebuttable presumption of legitimacy),
If that isn't what happens, I'd say the Judge is probably biased.
Excellent answer and thanks for doing this AMA, definitely needed here