Let them spam it. If anything, they're giving credence to the claims where before they were saying there was no fraud whatsoever. Now that they see undeniable fraud, they're needing to rationalize it and they're doing it by saying "both sides committed fraud." If someone committed fraud on either side, they need to be held accountable. If they can only cite one case and we can cite many more, not really going to be a great look for them.