He said on the actual evidence they have seen so far, which is a few thousand dead people voting, that alone will not be enough to overturn any result.
No one has shown any solid evidence of voter fraud that can been proved at this stage apart from dead people voting.
Sworn affidavits are not proof of voter fraud. Witnesses provide sworn affadavits all the time in court for both the prosecution and the defence but it's not proof, it's just a witness account.
Of course that can all change if they can provide proof or Trumps lawyers can convince a judge to look into the allegations and make a judgement on moving forward with contesting a vote count.
You took that out of context.
He said on the actual evidence they have seen so far, which is a few thousand dead people voting, that alone will not be enough to overturn any result.
No one has shown any solid evidence of voter fraud that can been proved at this stage apart from dead people voting.
Sworn affidavits are not proof of voter fraud. Witnesses provide sworn affadavits all the time in court for both the prosecution and the defence but it's not proof, it's just a witness account.
Of course that can all change if they can provide proof or Trumps lawyers can convince a judge to look into the allegations and make a judgement on moving forward with contesting a vote count.