The headline says one thing, the quote in the article says:
"But the president's efforts are unlikely to move a single state from Mr. Biden's column, and certainly they're not enough to change the final outcome."
Rove was also quoted:
"To win, Mr. Trump must prove systemic fraud, with illegal votes in the tens of thousands," Rove wrote. "There is no evidence of that so far."
There is "no evidence of that" is not the same as no fraud. C'mon man, you think the fraudsters were going to leave evidence lying on the table?
Businessinsider quotes the Rove WSJ article. It's behind a paywall, so no idea what was originally said by Rove.
Rove is looking out for Rove, no doubt, but it's hard to tell if his words are being twisted by the media into fake news.
Wapo did this to the USPS Whistleblower even more obviously and already refuted, but the stink of Wapo's lie hasn't dissipated and even news sites like LaCorte have [or had] the fake story.
He's parsing.
What he really means is no "voter" committed fraud.
He's not referring to the deep state and the Democrats -- that OBVIOUSLY DID RIG THE ELECTION.
Aye, he's a slick devil and always has been.
Nobody cares what this Bush-league Fox flunkie sputters.
Businessinsider twisted the story a wee bit here.
The headline says one thing, the quote in the article says:
Rove was also quoted:
There is "no evidence of that" is not the same as no fraud. C'mon man, you think the fraudsters were going to leave evidence lying on the table?
Businessinsider quotes the Rove WSJ article. It's behind a paywall, so no idea what was originally said by Rove.
Rove is looking out for Rove, no doubt, but it's hard to tell if his words are being twisted by the media into fake news.
Wapo did this to the USPS Whistleblower even more obviously and already refuted, but the stink of Wapo's lie hasn't dissipated and even news sites like LaCorte have [or had] the fake story.
How can you say there's no voter fraud?
It's already confirmed dead people have voted and that also counts as "fraud"
We need to quit saying Fraud.
There is no voter fraud. Fraud is deceptive manipulation for personal gain.
This is election tampering.... the willful destruction or manipulation of legal ballots to sway an election.
Karl might be semi-swamp but he is a highly skilled litigator, he understands that in a court of law definitions of words is paramount.
Fraud is not what happened here, a single person did not defraud anyone for personal gain.
A cabal of conspirators performed wide spread election tampering to manipulate the results of a democratic election.
We are actively engaged in a war of words, use the right words.
Election Tampering.....
Putin said he would congratulate the winner AFTER the election is certified.
Along with the President of Mexico.
And Xi's China...