2957
Comments (59)
sorted by:
32
Bhoelscher 32 points ago +32 / -0

How many ballots are we talking about here?

31
sully 31 points ago +41 / -10

Quite possibly around 600,000+

I'm sure they didn't segregate them at all and mixed them all in. This could get really spicy.

54
deleted 54 points ago +54 / -0
30
JohnBarron 30 points ago +30 / -0

This is the correct answer

15
ImIke 15 points ago +15 / -0

This is correct - it points to the votes received after the deadline, which were already sequestered.

It's positive. Sets us on path to overturn quite a few votes.

4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
6
Shakakka99 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why shouldn't it apply to the ballots that have been counted? You're basically rewarding them for ignoring the order until now.

4
sully 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah I read that. Totally ridiculous.

3
illmatic_diplomat 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m sure (and hope) Trump team hasn’t publicly stated how they plan to recreate and locate such ballots which were counted for removal, to avoid other guilty states on the list from taking any proactive cover actions. But what’s the brilliant minds here think? Maybe we shouldn’t discuss should there be any shill lurkers out and about ...

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
14
presticus 14 points ago +14 / -0

Everything they didn't segregate? So all of Philly?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
-9
deleted -9 points ago +1 / -10
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
10
jimonalimb 10 points ago +10 / -0

Judge's first order was to segregate ALL ballots collected after 8pm, Nov 3. If they mixed them in, the next logical step would be to invalidate all ballots COUNTED after 8pm. I can only hope this is what happens.

6
Bhoelscher 6 points ago +6 / -0

That would be absolutely insane! The amount of REEEEEEEEing would be music to our ears.

1
DisjointedHunstville 1 point ago +1 / -0

They can claim 5, there’s absolutely no way to know given the shoddy process

24
deleted 24 points ago +24 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
11
jshelton5 11 points ago +12 / -1

absolute fucking mad lad

8
saltyviewer123 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'm seeing two articles with conflicting information about whether or not they were included in the current count. Do we know?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
8
Openminded_penis 8 points ago +10 / -2

I already masturbated this morning. Maybe i'll do again

9
Seal_Pen 9 points ago +10 / -1

Try nofap

6
M3CJC 6 points ago +7 / -1

Gotta pump those numbers up rook

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
SPEZ_CUPS_CCP_BALLS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Freedom boner protruding, totally not disrespectful

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
5
Nimble_Sneak 5 points ago +5 / -0

Waiting for facebook to fact check this as false and correct the judge..won't be long now

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
chopz 3 points ago +3 / -0

They definitely mixed everything together. Who wouldn't. Fucking shit show

3
Constantine2000 3 points ago +3 / -0

So what is the action if these places didn't segregate those ballots - anyone know what the legally realistic action is?

3
783hz 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fix the title. This is only for new voters who failed to verify their identity by November 12th. Very small number of ballots.

3
DisjointedHunstville 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is NO way to trust the count of segregated votes by PA election officials.

They can literally claim right now that there are a grand total of 5 segregated ballots and there is no way to verify since they broke chain of custody and didn’t allow republican poll watchers to witness anything!

Watch out for them claiming they’re abiding by the court order, but nothing changing!

2
PNWArtist 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is excellent news. First step.

These, unless I've made a mistake, are the already segregated and not part of the total votes. They were put in a pile because a federal judge (SCOTUS?) told them to set them aside because it was sketchy.

So, yes to the sketchy. Bye bye potential Pedo Joe votes.

2
Pilotmtb 2 points ago +2 / -0

IM NOT TIRED OF WINNING YET

2
jump3r34 2 points ago +2 / -0

But, 'did' they segregate them?

2
Here_we_go 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes

6
jump3r34 6 points ago +6 / -0

You all do realize that every article of mail image is scanned in and cataloged in the USPS central DB right? - This stems from the old anthrax threat and it stayed because of other possible threats

The mail-in envelopes have (I think) no less than 3 different barcodes/qr_codes on them and the ballots themselves also have at least 2 or 3

So, if you can track the mail at every distribution checkpoint (scanned) and the envelopes (if the codes are unique) and they are reference-able to the ballots, then one could effectively have known about the hotspots for duplicate ballot fraud before the election even happened. In addition to evidence of the mail in fraud, one could also be exposing the complicit actors in those departments as well.

1
t-ara-fan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let me just delete a few files .... ok .... what were you saying?

1
jump3r34 1 point ago +1 / -0

Chain of custody now broken, awe shucks!

Gonna have to toss those - no other mail images was lost those days!

1
CornandSoybeans 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fucking right they did. There be a pile of segregated ballots and they will all be for trump.

2
Adjam 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is great news!

2
Neonentity 2 points ago +2 / -0

How much Republican vs republican vs RINO in the PA State House?

2
boreal_storm 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is a major development.

1
Trumpditit 1 point ago +1 / -0

In essence,, this is great news, but,,, they already mixed all the v\ballots together, and destroyed the sealed envolopre part, which would have been dated and signed, to vilify who sent it, meaning the crime has been committed and the criminals have gotten away to another country at this rate. Prove me wrong.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
HenkZeilstra 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is not enough MOAARRRRE

1
cybertygerfire88 1 point ago +1 / -0

When one of these big swing states flips back to Trump the saltwater damn is gonna break.

1
MemeForTheWin 1 point ago +1 / -0

this refers only to the ballots where voters signed up on the day of the election and could not provide proof of identity at that time. these votes have not been and will not be counted. this is good news, but not result changing news

1
Spark-001 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought they didn’t segregate them though?

1
jts1 1 point ago +1 / -0

AMEN! Let's Rock and Roll! Love you Trump and patriots!!

1
47urOFH3d 1 point ago +1 / -0

Secretary of State can't change election law. This should be an 'also, water is wet'-situation.

0
Here_we_go 0 points ago +1 / -1

Its not a big number and haven't been counted