285
Comments (43)
sorted by:
66
Tawburgle2 66 points ago +66 / -0

This might be 100% true, but never, ever trust Wikipedia as a source.

16
Alienus 16 points ago +16 / -0

Came here just to say this. Wikipedia is sometimes just street talk- rumors. Check its sources, then scrutinize those too....

7
NazisWereSocialist 7 points ago +7 / -0

Especially now while they’re on overdrive trying to discredit everything we say.

34
WalkFastGoHome 34 points ago +34 / -0

Seriously. Why is everyone throwing out OANN for Newsmax? There are so many issues with NMax that don't seem to be there for oann. Don't get distracted by the new shiny!

27
Gotrek 27 points ago +27 / -0

Thank you Exactly.

News max came out of nowhere and everyone is shilling for it. OANN was always here with us.

23
WalkFastGoHome 23 points ago +23 / -0

It's so calculated and inorganic. Oann earned our trust over the past several years. Let's welcome Newsmax into the fold, but be skeptical of them in the meantime.

7
Shakakka99 7 points ago +7 / -0

Let's watch both, weight the facts more than the opinions, and take everything with a grain of salt.

7
Troll 7 points ago +7 / -0

Same with parler.

15
saltymainahkracken 15 points ago +15 / -0

I watch them both. They're still behind info coming to TheDonald.win. And I rarely believe anything Wikipedia says re: anything currently trending. Ruddy also wrote a book called The Strange Death of Vince Foster, which was a strange death. Pretty sure Foster was suicided by the Clintons. Slick Willy was in the WH then. Can't speak to the rest of his bio though or what WIKI claims about Newsmax. Take everything with a grain of salt, do your research and check sources.

8
MuadDon 8 points ago +8 / -0

I've never heard of newsmax in my life until the day after the election. People are going way, way too hard for them. Why do people need centralized news so bad? At best, it's a subpar way to become informed.

2
unclebobinator 2 points ago +2 / -0

Still not sure why people watch either, unless they're watching it for entertainment.

Just browse thedonald.win for 10 minutes is the same thing as watching OANN/Newsmax for an hour.

1
WalkFastGoHome 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fair point. We are the news.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
13
deleted 13 points ago +14 / -1
5
unclebobinator 5 points ago +5 / -0

Only liberal fucks do fill in Wikipedia. They ban volunteer editors if they edit an article that even slightly goes against their super pro-left agenda. Moderate liberals get the boot from that site. They want nothing but hardcore antifa/blm supporting commies to edit their shit turd of a website.

Even though they were biased, many years ago I could at least refer to the sources they use and get real information. Now I can't even do that since their sources, if you can even call them that, are compromised bullshit.

13
deleted 13 points ago +14 / -1
12
namechangearoo 12 points ago +13 / -1

Lol. Trust Wikipedia? Nah.

7
ubunt2 7 points ago +7 / -0

thedonald.tv .... when?

6
CommiesAreLosers 6 points ago +6 / -0

Newsmax articles are almost as bad as Drudge some days. They are a garbage organization. There are only 4½ sites that can be relied upon:

TheDonald.win Gateway Pundit (most of the time) The Last Refuge / Conservative Treehouse Breitbart (some of the time) One America News Network (OANN)

That is the full list.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
2
halcyondream 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I've been burned a few times by Gateway Pundit.

1
TrustingGod 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. They have a 24-48 hour rule, for sure. Like when they dropped that story about Mueller accusations during Kav hearings. While it did provide some fodder (well if you believe all women, why not this one?), though it ultimately ended up being false. I'm sure there are more examples.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
Flirtmeaway2 6 points ago +6 / -0

OANN

5
You_Aint_Black 5 points ago +5 / -0

OANN is 1000000x better than fucking Newsmax.

4
redundantrope 4 points ago +4 / -0

I saw spicer show the other day and he had an apparently democrat on and totally let her get away with saying that the democrats won and Trump should concede. Not happy about his non response. Maybe ask newsmax to address these concerns.

Possible TRUMP NEWS COMING in future.

3
mintscape 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wikipedia also states that our wonderful home is a "Far-Right" web site.

3
MyNewToy 3 points ago +3 / -0

why would you trust wikipedia?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Afripede 2 points ago +2 / -0

That dog won’t hunt. If they turn on us they’ll be done like Fox. Forever. This is the strength of the Trump movement.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
jnic815 2 points ago +2 / -0

They also tried to say that Parler was owned by George Soros.... so

2
the_sky_is_falling 2 points ago +2 / -0

Other than thedonald.win, I literally would stop giving 2 fucks about any more news organizations.

Stop giving any of them your eyes and your time.

Stop acting like a battered wife who keeps running to abusive men.

Just walk away.

2
JohnQQQ 2 points ago +2 / -0

I tried newmax but it was zzzzz

2
AnointedVisions 2 points ago +2 / -0

My advice to everyone is to shift away from the idea of "supporting" any specific network and to just keep looking for truth. Always be ready to find out that some network or another is lying to you.

1
TakingCoatsWIN 1 point ago +2 / -1

I trust OANN. I don't trust Newsmax.

But I think we need to use them in a way to get the word out. They have more presence on cable news than OANN right now.

At least until Trump is secured in his 2nd term, but remain very cautious of them.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0