If you saw the data analysis from a few days ago by Dr. Shiva, MIT PhD, this plot is showing the same results as his, just with an additional scatter on top of Shiva's. If you didn't check it out, I highly recommend it.
Shiva found that, while examining Michigan's top 4 counties, that as a precinct skewed more %republican in it's straight-party-votes, Trump received LESS votes, which defies logic. The new plot added on top of that (represented by the blue dots for Biden's performance) shows that as precincts got more %republican, they casted more votes for Biden. None of it makes any sense, considering Trumps very-high approval rating amongst republicans.
Shiva concluded that it is 99% likely caused by an algorithm giving votes to Biden.
I'm sorry, bro, but it's Shiva who is mistaken. He's reached the wrong conclusion, an implausible one, but I think he stumbled into the real fuckery.
Read it carefully. Grasp what I'm saying. Many have already pointed out Shiva's flawed analysis. I point it out too. A negative slope (left and down) is NORMAL and EXPECTED when plotting this data.
What ISN'T normal or expected is how it actually flattens out in heavy Democrat districts.
It's the heavy D districts where the actual fuckery is going on.
If you saw the data analysis from a few days ago by Dr. Shiva, MIT PhD, this plot is showing the same results as his, just with an additional scatter on top of Shiva's. If you didn't check it out, I highly recommend it.
Shiva found that, while examining Michigan's top 4 counties, that as a precinct skewed more %republican in it's straight-party-votes, Trump received LESS votes, which defies logic. The new plot added on top of that (represented by the blue dots for Biden's performance) shows that as precincts got more %republican, they casted more votes for Biden. None of it makes any sense, considering Trumps very-high approval rating amongst republicans.
Shiva concluded that it is 99% likely caused by an algorithm giving votes to Biden.
Whoa sounds suspect thanks for the explanation
I'm sorry, bro, but it's Shiva who is mistaken. He's reached the wrong conclusion, an implausible one, but I think he stumbled into the real fuckery.
Read it carefully. Grasp what I'm saying. Many have already pointed out Shiva's flawed analysis. I point it out too. A negative slope (left and down) is NORMAL and EXPECTED when plotting this data.
What ISN'T normal or expected is how it actually flattens out in heavy Democrat districts.
It's the heavy D districts where the actual fuckery is going on.